01 / Federal Opportunity Brief
66--ENGINE DATA UNIT, IN REPAIR/MODIFICATION OF
02 / Federal Buyer
Who is buying?
03 / Purchase
What is the government buying?
66--ENGINE DATA UNIT, IN REPAIR/MODIFICATION OF
The current notice is soliciting this requirement from eligible offerors.
The notice states that the SOW establishes criteria for repair and testing/inspection of the subject item. The supplied evidence does not include the item details, deliverable descriptions, or any schedule for modifications beyond the general criteria statement.
The notice describes how the Government issues the instrument: it is issued when deposited in the mail, transmitted by facsimile, or sent by electronic commerce (including email), and it also states that the Government’s acceptance of the contractor’s proposal constitutes a bilateral agreement to issue the contract/delivery order/purchase order/modification.
The notice references a Statement of Work (SOW) that establishes repair/testing/inspection criteria, but it does not explain whether specific work is assigned through orders under a larger vehicle or how work instructions are issued beyond the general ordering statement.
04 / Contracting Requirements
How will this procurement work?
| Requirement | What the notice says | Source status |
|---|---|---|
| Eligibility | A statement indicates that the SBA representative reviewed the requirement and that a set-aside recommendation was not applicable. The evidence also includes references to AbilityOne and mandatory workflow/WFP modules, but the notice text provided does not clearly state offeror eligibility criteria beyond the set-aside determination. | Partially Confirmed |
| Contract ceiling | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Minimum guarantee | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Contract duration | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Foreign participation | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Proposal and award procedure | Submission instructions are provided: contractors submit a quote that includes either a firm-fixed price quote, and quotes may be emailed and must be received by the closing date on page 1 of the solicitation. The evidence does not provide detailed evaluation factors, scoring, or the evaluation procedure. | Partially Confirmed |
| Staffing and security | No security clearance, personnel staffing plan, or access/security requirements are stated in the supplied evidence excerpts. | Not Disclosed |
Read the original SAM.gov description
CONTACT INFORMATION|4|N733.16|M5M|771_229_3066|michael.j.keith40.civ@us.navy.mil| ITEM UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AND VALUATION (JAN 2023)|19|||||||||||||||||||| HIGHER-LEVEL CONTRACT QUALITY REQUIREMENT|8|X|||||||| WIDE AREA WORKFLOW PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS (JAN 2023)|16|Invoice and Receiving Report Combo|Source|TBD|N00383|TBD|TBD|See Schedule|TBD|See Schedule|||||||| NAVY USE OF ABILITYONE SUPPORT CONTRACTOR - RELEASE OF OFFEROR INFORMATION (3-18))|1|| MANDATORY USE OF WORKFLOW PRO (WFP) MOD ASSIST MODULE|1|| WARRANTY OF SUPPLIES OF A NONCOMPLEX NATURE (JUN 2003)|6|365 Days | 45 Days Of The Last Delivery Under This Contract||||| EQUAL OPPORTUITY FOR WORKERS WITH DISABILITIES (DEV 2026-O0040)(FEB 2026)|4||||| BUY AMERICAN-FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS-BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM-BASIC (FEB 2024)|11|||||||||||| LIMITATIONS ON PASS-THROUGH CHARGES (DEV 2026-O0048)(MAR 2026)|1|| SECURITY PROHIBITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS (CLASS DEVIATION 2026-O0025)(FEB 2026)|7|||||||| BUY AMERICAN-FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS-BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM CERTIFICATE-BASIC (FEB 2024))|5|||||| BUY AMERICAN--BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM CERTIFICATE-BASIC (FEB 2024)|1|| ALTERNATE A, ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (DEVIATION 2026-O0043)(FEB 2026))|13|||||||||||||| ROYALTY INFORMATION (APR 1984)|1|| NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, ANDENERGY PROGRAM USE (APR 2008))|2||DO-A7| The Small Business Administration representative at NAVSUP WSS has reviewed this requirement and determined that a set-aside recommendation was not applicable for this procurement. This RFQ is for NAVY repair. Repair Turnaround Time(RTAT): the resultant contractual delivery requirement is measured from asset return to the date of asset acceptance under the terms of the contract. For purpose of this section, Return is defined as physical receipt of the F-condition asset at the contractors facility as reflected in the Action Date entry in the Commercial Asset Visibility (CAV) system. In accordance with the CAV Statement of Work, the contractor us required to accurately report all transactions by the end of the fifth regular business day after receipt and the Action Date entered in CAV must be dated to reflect the actual date of the physical receipt. The contractor must obtain final inspection and acceptance by the government for all assets within the RTATs established in this contract. This RFQ is for repair. NAVSUP WSS requests that contractors submit a quote that includes either a firm-fixed price quote. Quotes may be emailed to the below email address and must be received on or before on the closing date listed on page 1 of the solicitation. michael.j.keith40.civ@us.navy.mil. This contract/delivery order/purchase order/modification is issued by the Government when deposited in the mail, transmitted by facsimile or sent by any electronic commerce method, including email. The Government's acceptance of the contractor's proposal constitutes bilateral agreement to issue this contract/delivery order/purchase order/modification. \ 1. SCOPE 1.1 . Markings shall be in accordance with MIL-STD-130. 1.2 Articles to be furnished hereunder shall be repaired, tested andinspected in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in theRequirements Section of this document. 1.3 Unless expressly provided for elsewhere in this clause, equipment suchas fixtures, jigs, dies, patterns, mylars, special tooling, test equipment, orany other manufacturing aid required for the manufacture and/or testing of the subject item(s) will not be provided by the Government or any other source and is the sole responsibility of the contractor. The foregoing applies notwithstanding any reference to such equipment or the furnishing thereof that may be contained in any drawing or referenced specification. 1.4 The use of MIL-W-81381 wire in any item to be delivered under this procurement is prohibited. The foregoing prohibition applies notwithstanding any reference to MIL-W-81381 wire that may be made in any of the drawings or specifications for this procurement. SAE-AS22759 series wire shall be used in lieu of MIL-W-81381 wire, in any place where MIL-W-81381 wire is cited in this procurement. Any questions concerning this requirement should be directed to the Procuring Contracting Officer. 1.5 If MIL-STD-454 is referenced in the drawings or in the specification,the contractor is expected to show compliance with IPC/EIAJ-STD-001C Personnel performing tasks in accordance with IPC/EIAJ-STD-001C shall be trained and certified as requried by IPC/EIAJ-STD-001C paragraph 5.1.4. 2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS - NOT APPLICABLE 3. REQUIREMENTS 3.1 1.0 GENERAL 3.1.1 This Statement of Work (SOW) establishes the criteria for repair and testing /inspection of the subject item. It includes inspection, component repair and replacement,reassembly and testing procedures required to return units back into a servicable condition. 3.2 2.0 DEFINITIONS. 3.2.1 CONTRACTOR: Is defined as the successful offeror awarded a contract, orderor issued a project work order. The term "contract" encompasses a contract, an order, or a project work order. 3.2.2 OVERHAUL: An overhauled part is one which has been disassembled, cleaned, inspected, repaired as necessary (by replacing or repairing all components which have been found to exceed limits established by the repair/overhaul manual) reassembled and tested in accordance with the approved repair/overhaul manual listed in this SOW and returned to a Ready for Issue (RFI) condition (Refer to contract schedule for items to be overhauled). 3.2.3 REPAIR: A repaired part is one which has been restored to a Ready for Issue(RFI) condition (by replacing or repairing those components found to be defective, broken, damaged or inoperative during the initial evaluation and troubleshooting phase) and tested in accordance with the approved repair/overhaul manual listed in this SOW (Refer to contract schedule for items to be repaired). 3.3 3.0 SCOPE 3.3.1 GENERAL. The items to be furnished hereunder shall be overhauled, upgraded,repaired, tested, inspected, and accepted in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in this contract. Unless expressly provided Government Furnished Property, including equipment such as fixtures, jigs, dies, patterns, mylars, special tooling, special test equipment, or any other manufacturing aid required for the repair, manufacture, and/or testing of the subject item(s) will not be provided by the Government and shall be the responsibility of the contractor. The foregoing applies notwithstanding any reference to such equipment or the furnishing thereof that may be contained in any drawing, manual, or specification for the contract items. 3.3.2 REPAIR UPGRADE REQUIREMENTS:The contractor shall provide the necessary facility, labor, materials, parts, and test and tooling equipment required to to return the following items to a Ready For Issue (RFI) condition: ENGINE DATA UNIT ;9B-84052-4; P/N, ;015528829; NSN, ;IAW Applicable Manuals; Tech Publications 3.3.3 RFI is defined as that condition allowing the items to perform properly and reliably in an operational environment in a manner they were intended to operate.The contractor must perform all repairs/upgrades at the facility identified within this SOW. Repairs performed by the contractor or subcontractor shall be performed in accordance with the specified drawings and repair manual(s). 3.4 Changes to such manuals used for repairs under this contract, or changes to drawings or specifications used in the manufacture of parts utilized in these repairs, require Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) approval in accordance with the Configuration Management provisions of this Statement of Work or contract. Under no circumstances should the repair, test, and inspection extend beyond the requirements of this paragraph unless authorized by the Government QAR.In addition, requests for approval of changes to a repair source or repair facility shall be submitted in writing to the PCO prior to making any such change. 3.4.1 Any repairs performed using unapproved changes to such manuals, drawings, specifications, or changes to repair source or facility are done at the contractor's own risk. If the Government disapproves the requested change, the contractor shall replace any delivered items repaired using such unapproved manuals,drawing, specification, repair source or repair facility change. The contractor is not entitled to any equitable adjustment to the contract price or terms based on the Government's disapproval of a requested change to manuals, drawings, specifications, or to a repair source or facility. 3.4.2 References on Drawings and Specifications:For repair and overhaul purposes only. All references to the "prime contractor" or the "actual manufacturer" appearing on the drawings and / or specifications or technical data furnished by the Government shall be read as the "Government Designated Agency" 3.4.3 Process Control Documentation: The contractor shall prepare and maintain repair procedures, and test / inspection information / procedures which shall be made available to the Government for review and approval. The procedures shall include sequential diagrams of processes, as well as the performance specifications to perform the testing / inspection procedures. Those processes shall be frozen after approval of the inspection / Test. 3.4.4 Beyond Economical Repair (BER). An item is BER if the cost of the repair exceeds 75% of the production quantity price to replace the item, current at time of award. This replacement price is for the purposes of BER determinations only, and may not be used or relied on by the offeror in the pricing of the repairs required by this contract. Items determined BER are not included in the contract price. The contractor shall obtain written concurrence from DCMA for all units determined by the contractor to be BER. All such determinations, including the basis for the determination, the repair required, the proposed price to repair and the DCMA written concurrence shall be provided by the contractor to the PCO, with a copy to the inventory manager. After receipt of the required documentation, the PCO shall provide the contractor disposition instructions or contractual authority for repair of the item. The contractor is not authorized to proceed with the repair until notification to proceed is received from the PCO. Any disposal ordered shall be performed by the contractor in accordance with all applicable regulations and in accordance with all DCMA disposal procedures and requirements. 3.4.5 Missing on Induction (MOI). A Weapons Repairable Assembly (WRA) is subject to this MOI provision if the item received by the contractor for repair is missing one or more Shop Replaceable Assemblies (SRAs). Contractor replacement of MOI SRAs is not included in the contract price. The contractor shall immediately notify DCMA when an item is received with MOI SRA(s) and shall obtain written verification from DCMA for all WRAs determined to have MOI SRA(s). The contractor shall provide all such determinations, including identification of the missing SRA(s), and the DCMA written verification, to the Inventory Manager with a copy to the PCO and ACO prior to induction and/or repair of the WRA. The contractor shall not induct and/or repair WRAs with MOI SRAs until instructions on how to proceed are provided to the contractor by the Inventory Manager (where no adjustment price to the contract is required) or by the PCO. Items received by the contractor missing consumable parts are not MOI items. Rather, repair of such items and replacement of the missing consumable parts are included in the contract price and the item shall be inducted and repaired by the contractor under this contract. 3.4.6 Replacing Failed or Missing Shop Replaceable Assembly (SRA) when repairinga Weapons Replaceable Assembly (WRA). 3.4.7 A. When the contractor believes one or more SRA(s) wi
05 / Historical Spending Trend
How has spending on the selected comparable contracts changed?
The same closed fiscal-year window and the same complete comparable-contract set are used throughout this Brief. Net obligations total $266.0K across 4 fiscal years.

| Fiscal year | Comparable obligations | Actions | Vendors |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2020 | $42.9K | 1 | 1 |
| FY 2021 | $65.2K | 3 | 1 |
| FY 2023 | $75.2K | 1 | 1 |
| FY 2024 | $82.7K | 1 | 1 |
06 / Related Historical Awards
Which contracts support the comparison?
No direct contract reference was found. 6 broad matches are shown as supporting context.

| Contract | Vendor | Latest activity | Office | NAICS / PSC | Match | Obligations | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N0038321PD071 | INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS AND SUPPORT, INC. | May 20, 2021 | NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 334514 / 6620 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $7.2K | 1 |
| N0038320PD042 | INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS AND SUPPORT, INC. | Jan 30, 2020 | NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 334514 / 6620 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $42.9K | 1 |
| N0038324PA016 | INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC | Jun 12, 2024 | NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 334511 / 6620 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $82.7K | 1 |
| N0038323PD022 | INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS AND SUPPORT, INC. | Apr 26, 2023 | NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 336413 / 6620 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $75.2K | 1 |
| N0038322PD011 | INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS AND SUPPORT, INC. | Nov 30, 2021 | NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 335312 / 6620 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $43.5K | 1 |
| N0038321PD069 | INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS AND SUPPORT, INC. | May 17, 2021 | NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 336413 / 6620 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $14.5K | 1 |
07 / Contractor Evidence
Which contractors have performed related work?
Historical contractors are ranked by direct procurement-family evidence and comparable contract activity. The table distinguishes connected holders from broader performers without identifying unverified bidders.
No directly connected predecessor was identified. The companies below are historical performers selected from the comparable contract set; none is identified as a bidder.

| Company | Evidence | Fit | Why included | Contracts | Actions | Obligations | Latest activity | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS AND SUPPORT, INC. UEI RS9LP9JYHGN6 · CAGE 0EUW0 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 6 | 6 | $266.0K | Jun 12, 2024 | GETWAB profile Verified via SAM Entities Official website |
08 / Competitive Landscape
How was comparable work competed?
Competition treatment is calculated from exactly the same closed-period contract set used in Sections 5–7. It describes historical actions, not the outcome of this solicitation.

| FPDS treatment | Code | Actions | Obligations | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not competed under simplified acquisition procedures | G | 5 | $190.8K | 71.7% |
| Not competed | C | 1 | $75.2K | 28.3% |
09 / Procurement History
How was this opportunity published and updated?
2 SAM.gov notice records were resolved into this procurement family. The chronology shows how the requirement was published and updated.
| Notice | Type | Posted | Response deadline | Status | Official source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N0038326QBB16 66--ENGINE DATA UNIT, IN REPAIR/MODIFICATION OF | Presolicitation | Sep 10, 2026 | Oct 26, 2026 12:00 AM GMT-0400 | Active | View on SAM.gov |
| N0038326QBB16 Current Brief record 66--ENGINE DATA UNIT, IN REPAIR/MODIFICATION OF | Solicitation | Sep 25, 2026 | Oct 26, 2026 4:30 PM GMT-0400 | Active | View on SAM.gov |
10 / NAICS and PSC Market Context
How large is the selected comparable market?
Classification codes organize the evidence; they do not prove that every contract in the broader NAICS or PSC market matches this requirement.
11 / Capture Signals and Risks
What should be validated before committing capture resources?
Capture signals separate verified procurement-family evidence from unresolved requirements and market-only indicators.
Direct procurement-family evidence
No direct award record found
Buyer proximity
6 comparable record(s) share the contracting office
Eligibility
Not disclosed in the indexed notice
Unresolved requirement fields
7
12 / Who Should Pursue
When does this opportunity fit?
- Your team can demonstrate recent, relevant delivery in 66--ENGINE DATA UNIT, IN REPAIR/MODIFICATION OF.
- Your company can document the stated eligibility conditions: A statement indicates that the SBA representative reviewed the requirement and that a set-aside recommendation was not applicable. The evidence also includes references to AbilityOne and mandatory workflow/WFP modules, but the notice text provided does not clearly state offeror eligibility criteria beyond the set-aside determination.
- You can perform under the stated acquisition model: The notice describes how the Government issues the instrument: it is issued when deposited in the mail, transmitted by facsimile, or sent by electronic commerce (including email), and it also states that the Government’s acceptance of the c
- You can show credible past performance for NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT or a closely related federal customer.
- Your technical scope fits, but you lack demonstrated history with NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT.
- You need a specialist teammate to close unresolved staffing, security, or detailed-scope requirements before committing.
- You cannot satisfy or verify the stated eligibility conditions: A statement indicates that the SBA representative reviewed the requirement and that a set-aside recommendation was not applicable. The evidence also includes references to AbilityOne and mandatory workflow/WFP modules, but the notice text provided does not clearly state offeror eligibility criteria beyond the set-aside determination.
- Your delivery model cannot support the stated contract vehicle or order-based work structure.
- The unresolved requirements shown above cannot be validated before committing proposal resources.



