GETWAB

01 / Federal Opportunity Brief

COVER,ACCESS,AIRCRA

Status
Active
Deadline
Oct 26, 2026 4:30 PM GMT-0400
Solicitation
N0038326QQB50
Updated
Sep 26, 2026
NAICS
336413
PSC
1560

02 / Federal Buyer

Who is buying?

03 / Purchase

What is the government buying?

Requirement

COVER,ACCESS,AIRCRA
The current notice is soliciting this requirement from eligible offerors.

Scope available now

Partially confirmed: the provided evidence includes quality-control responsibilities and a requirement that items meet the Statement of Work requirements, but it does not describe the actual physical deliverable details implied by the title (COVER, ACCESS, AIRCRA) beyond payment and quality-documentation references.

Contract vehicle

Not disclosed in the provided evidence.

How work is assigned

Not disclosed in the provided evidence.

04 / Contracting Requirements

How will this procurement work?

RequirementWhat the notice saysSource status
EligibilityPartially confirmed: the notice references “NAVY USE OF ABILITYONE SUPPORT CONTRACTOR - RELEASE OF OFFEROR INFORMATION (3-18),” which suggests AbilityOne-related handling, but the actual eligibility/participation requirement is not provided in the supplied evidence.Partially Confirmed
Contract ceilingNot disclosedNot Disclosed
Minimum guaranteeNot disclosedNot Disclosed
Contract durationNot disclosedNot Disclosed
Foreign participationNot disclosedNot Disclosed
Proposal and award procedurePartially confirmed: submission-related instruction is present for submitting a variance request, but detailed proposal/evaluation factors and selection method are not provided in the supplied evidence.Partially Confirmed
Staffing and securityNot disclosed in the provided evidence.Not Disclosed
Read the original SAM.gov description

CONTACT INFORMATION|4|N793.12|N00383|771-229-0455|jessica.l.harpel2.civ@us.navy.mil| ITEM UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AND VALUATION (JAN 2023)|19|||||||||||||||||||| HIGHER-LEVEL CONTRACT QUALITY REQUIREMENT|8|X|||||||| INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SUPPLIES|26||||||||||||||||||||||||||| WIDE AREA WORKFLOW PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS (JAN 2023)|16|Invoice and receiving reports (combo)||N/A|N00383|N/A|N/A|N/A|N/A||||||||| NAVY USE OF ABILITYONE SUPPORT CONTRACTOR - RELEASE OF OFFEROR INFORMATION (3-18))|1|WSS| MANDATORY USE OF WORKFLOW PRO (WFP) MOD ASSIST MODULE|1|Jessica Harpel| WARRANTY OF SUPPLIES OF A NONCOMPLEX NATURE (JUN 2003)|6|1 year after date of delivery |45 days after discovery of defect||||| EQUAL OPPORTUITY FOR WORKERS WITH DISABILITIES (DEV 2026-O0040)(FEB 2026)|4||||| BUY AMERICAN-FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS-BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM-BASIC (FEB 2024)|11|||||||||||| LIMITATIONS ON PASS-THROUGH CHARGES (DEV 2026-O0048)(MAR 2026)|1|| SECURITY PROHIBITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS (CLASS DEVIATION 2026-O0025)(FEB 2026)|7|||||||| BUY AMERICAN-FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS-BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM CERTIFICATE-BASIC (FEB 2024))|5|||||| BUY AMERICAN--BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM CERTIFICATE-BASIC (FEB 2024)|1|| ALTERNATE A, ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (DEVIATION 2026-O0043)(FEB 2026))|13|||||||||||||| ROYALTY INFORMATION (APR 1984)|1|| NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, ANDENERGY PROGRAM USE (APR 2008))|2||X| 1. SCOPE 1.1 . Markings shall be in accordance with MIL-STD-130. 2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS - NOT APPLICABLE 3. REQUIREMENTS The contractor shall maintain a quality control system which meets the requirements of Mil-I-45208A, Mil-Q 9858,ISO-9000 / 9001 / 9002 or equivalent. RESPONSIBILITY FOR INSPECTION: Unless otherwise specified, the contractor is responsible for the performance of all inspection requirements as specified herein. Except as otherwise specified, the contractor may use his own or any other facility suitable for the performance of the inspection requirements specified herein. PROCEDURES:The contractor shall prepare and maintain Quality Control Documentation, test and repair procedures, and inspection procedures which shall be made available to the Government for review and approval. The procedures shall include sequential diagrams of the test, repair, and inspection process, as well as the performance spcifications to perform the procedures. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM PLAN: The contractor shall develop, implement and maintain a Repair Quality Plan in compliance with the requirements of Mil-I-45208A, Mil-Q-9858, ISO,9000 / 9001 / 9002, or equvalent.The plan shall define the specific methods by which compliance with contractual requirements will be assured. All quality assurance data shall be provided to the Government for review and approval upon request. PURCHASED MATERIAL CONTROL: The contractor shall establish and maintain a system of control over purchased material which shall assure that the necessary requirements of this contract are included. in all sub contract agreements. A parts control system shall establish a record of performance for each purchased and internally manufactured part and shall be used to evaluate continued use of the source. The contractors control system shall be in compliance wil either Mil-I 45208A/Mil-Q-9858 or equivalent Quality Quality Assurance Standared.(ISO/AS:9000, 9001, 9002). RECEIVING INSPECTION OF PURCHASED MATERIAL: Purchased items shall be inspected upon receipt at the contractors facility to assure conformance with all requirements of the Technical Data Package (TDP). Evidence of such inspections shall be maintained for Government review at least twelve (12) months following acceptance of the end item. Inspection reports shall be maintained by the contractor. The inspection report shall, at a minimum, include a record of all dimensional data (coordinate/positional), material, finish, and process with appropriate pass/fail criteria, such ascertifications, and actual dimensional readings. FAILURE ANALYSIS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION:All failure analysis and corrective action reports/plans shall be submitted to the Government. NONCONFORMING MATERIAL:The contractor shall establish an effective system for controlling nonconforming material including procedures for identification, segregation, and disposition. CONTRACTOR INTERNAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB):IRB authority is delegated to the contractor for this contract only. The IRB may be used only for disposition of materials exhibiting minor non-conformances, scrap or rework to return a part to conformance with drawings or specifications as authorized by the approved repair procedures.IRB shall not use "AS-IS" disposition. A complete file of IRB actions shall be maintained for review by the Government for concurrance of classification. MATERIAL REVIEW BOARD (MRB):Formal MRB authority for disposition of "AS-IS"and for minor non-conformances is retained by the Government. The contractor shall submit the appropriate request for Variance via the DCMC to the NAVSUP Contracting Officer. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COMPLIANCE: All items must meet all requirements of this Statement of Work. The inspection requirements set forth in this SOW shall become part of the contractors overall inspection system or quality program. The absence of any inspection requirements in the SOW shall not relieve the contractor of the responsibility of assuring that all Government equipment submitted for acceptance comply with all requirements. Sampling in quality conformance does not authorize submission of known defective items, either indicated or actual, nor does it commit the procuring activity to acceptance of any defective items. REPAIR ASSESSMENT TESTING: The Government may select samples of the Contract Line Items (CLINS) which have completed repair and have been accepted by the Government representative for the purpose of conducting performance testing, environmental testing, and quality conformance examination in a repair assessment test program. A quantity of CLIN's may be randomly selected from each quaterly repair production completion for shipment to the CFA or other Government designated location to conduct this testing. RECORDS OF DATA COLLECTION: The contractor shall maintain a historical record file to contain copies of applicable data and documents for individual CLIN's and assemblies by CLIN serial number. The historical record file shall include,but not be limited to the following types of historical records: Receipt inspection documentation. Repair shop travelers or repair cards. Parts replacement records. Parts inspection data before and after repair as applicable. Acceptance test data. QA personnel shall maintain a complete receipt inspection,test, repair re-test, history card for each item processed. This information shall be made available to the Government upon request. 4. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS - NOT APPLICABLE. 5. PACKAGING- MIL-STD 2073 PACKAGING APPLIES AS FOUND ELSEWHERE IN THE SCHEDULE 6. NOTES - NOT APPLICABLE

05 / Historical Spending Trend

How has spending on the selected comparable contracts changed?

The same closed fiscal-year window and the same complete comparable-contract set are used throughout this Brief. Net obligations total $165.9K across 5 fiscal years.

Annual net obligations for the selected comparable contract set for this opportunity, classified under NAICS 336413 and PSC 1560.
Annual FPDS net obligations for the selected comparable contract set; direct and broad matches are identified separately in the table, and this is not total NAICS or PSC market spending.
Fiscal yearComparable obligationsActionsVendors
FY 2019$12.3K21
FY 2020$33.7K71
FY 2021$132.1K61
FY 2022-$12.3K92
FY 2023$051

06 / Related Historical Awards

Which contracts support the comparison?

No direct contract reference was found. 11 broad matches are shown as supporting context.

Selected historical contracts comparable to this opportunity, ranked by absolute net obligations.
Comparable contracts selected using buyer, office, classification and requirement-language evidence; they are not asserted as predecessors.
ContractVendorLatest activityOfficeNAICS / PSCMatchObligationsActions
N0038321FA32RBOEING COMPANY, THEMay 31, 2023NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336413 / 1560Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$9.8K3
N0038321FA348BOEING COMPANY, THEJun 2, 2021NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336413 / 1560Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$5.1K1
N0038321FA300BOEING COMPANY, THEFeb 8, 2023NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336413 / 1680Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$02
N0038321FA304BOEING COMPANY, THEJan 24, 2023NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336413 / 1680Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$10.1K4
N0038321FA32EBOEING COMPANY, THEJan 4, 2023NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336413 / 1680Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$01
N0038321FA31MBOEING COMPANY, THEOct 24, 2022NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336413 / 1615Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$7.3K2
N0038321FA30VBOEING COMPANY, THEAug 31, 2022NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336413 / 1680Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$5.5K2
N0038321FA336BOEING COMPANY, THEMay 5, 2022NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336413 / 1680Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$4.9K2
N0038321FA30FBOEING COMPANY, THEJan 27, 2022NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336413 / 1680Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$02
N0038321FA30HBOEING COMPANY, THEJun 16, 2021NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336413 / 1680Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$01
N0038319F0BB0NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONMay 13, 2022NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336413 / 1560Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$05

07 / Contractor Evidence

Which contractors have performed related work?

Historical contractors are ranked by direct procurement-family evidence and comparable contract activity. The table distinguishes connected holders from broader performers without identifying unverified bidders.

No directly connected predecessor was identified. The companies below are historical performers selected from the comparable contract set; none is identified as a bidder.

Suppliers ranked by net obligations within the selected comparable contract set for this opportunity.
Supplier concentration within the comparable contract set only; ranking does not establish incumbency or intent to bid.
CompanyEvidenceFitWhy includedContractsActionsObligationsLatest activityLinks
BOEING COMPANY, THE
UEI MF2LE5RK6L84 · CAGE 0PXV4
Broad historical performer
Historical performer
ModerateComparable buyer and requirement history1020$42.7KMay 31, 2023GETWAB profile
Verified via SAM Entities
Official website
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION
UEI T9XKQSKMW4J1 · CAGE 76823
Broad historical performer
Historical performer
ModerateComparable buyer and requirement history15$0May 13, 2022GETWAB profile

08 / Competitive Landscape

How was comparable work competed?

Competition treatment is calculated from exactly the same closed-period contract set used in Sections 5–7. It describes historical actions, not the outcome of this solicitation.

FPDS extent-of-competition categories recorded on the selected comparable contracts.
Competition treatment recorded only on the comparable contract set; it does not predict the outcome of this solicitation.
FPDS treatmentCodeActionsObligationsShare
Not competed under simplified acquisition proceduresG28$160.8K96.9%
Not competedC1$5.1K3.1%

09 / Procurement History

How was this opportunity published and updated?

One SAM.gov notice record was resolved for this procurement family.

NoticeTypePostedResponse deadlineStatusOfficial source
N0038326QQB50
Current Brief record
COVER,ACCESS,AIRCRA
SolicitationSep 25, 2026Oct 26, 2026 4:30 PM GMT-0400ActiveView on SAM.gov

10 / NAICS and PSC Market Context

How large is the selected comparable market?

Classification codes organize the evidence; they do not prove that every contract in the broader NAICS or PSC market matches this requirement.

Comparable obligations$165.9K
Comparable contracts11
Historical suppliers2
CoverageFY 2019–FY 2023

11 / Capture Signals and Risks

What should be validated before committing capture resources?

Capture signals separate verified procurement-family evidence from unresolved requirements and market-only indicators.

Watch

Direct procurement-family evidence

No direct award record found

Strong

Buyer proximity

11 comparable record(s) share the contracting office

Watch

Eligibility

Not disclosed in the indexed notice

Watch

Unresolved requirement fields

7

12 / Who Should Pursue

When does this opportunity fit?

Pursue if
  • Your team can demonstrate recent, relevant delivery in COVER,ACCESS,AIRCRA.
  • Your company can document the stated eligibility conditions: Partially confirmed: the notice references “NAVY USE OF ABILITYONE SUPPORT CONTRACTOR - RELEASE OF OFFEROR INFORMATION (3-18),” which suggests AbilityOne-related handling, but the actual eligibility/participation requirement is not provided in the supplied evidence.
  • You can show credible past performance for NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT or a closely related federal customer.
Partner if
  • Your technical scope fits, but you lack demonstrated history with NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT.
  • You need a specialist teammate to close unresolved staffing, security, or detailed-scope requirements before committing.
Pass or investigate further if
  • You cannot satisfy or verify the stated eligibility conditions: Partially confirmed: the notice references “NAVY USE OF ABILITYONE SUPPORT CONTRACTOR - RELEASE OF OFFEROR INFORMATION (3-18),” which suggests AbilityOne-related handling, but the actual eligibility/participation requirement is not provided in the supplied evidence.
  • The unresolved requirements shown above cannot be validated before committing proposal resources.