01 / Contract Profile
NNG09HR00C Federal Contract Award
Agency code 8000
ADMIN ACTION/ AWF
02 / Contract Size and Status
What is the recorded size and timing of this contract?
03 / Spending Trend
NNG09HR00C contract spending by fiscal year
Annual net obligations across the complete period available for this agency and PIID, from the first recorded fiscal year through the latest contract action.
Latest fiscal year obligations$3.74M
FY 2026Net obligationsComplete recorded range
| Fiscal year | Net obligations | Actions | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2008 | $9.50M | 1 | — |
| FY 2009 | $10.00M | 2 | +5.3% |
| FY 2010 | $118.00M | 23 | +1,080.0% |
| FY 2011 | $224.51M | 38 | +90.3% |
| FY 2012 | $239.34M | 32 | +6.6% |
| FY 2013 | $254.40M | 22 | +6.3% |
| FY 2014 | $234.00M | 22 | −8.0% |
| FY 2015 | $245.60M | 17 | +5.0% |
| FY 2016 | $340.50M | 33 | +38.6% |
| FY 2017 | $170.00M | 20 | −50.1% |
| FY 2018 | $54.50M | 17 | −67.9% |
| FY 2019 | $32.24M | 8 | −40.9% |
| FY 2020 | $28.45M | 14 | −11.8% |
| FY 2021 | $24.65M | 15 | −13.4% |
| FY 2022 | $35.03M | 12 | +42.1% |
| FY 2023 | $22.61M | 11 | −35.4% |
| FY 2024 | $20.40M | 9 | −9.8% |
| FY 2025 | $4.95M | 7 | −75.7% |
| FY 2026 | $3.74M | 6 | −24.4% |
04 / Federal Buyer
Which organization manages this contract?
| Department | Contracting agency | Contracting office |
|---|---|---|
| NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION | NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION | NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER |
05 / Contractor
Who holds this federal contract?
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI FYHNA5WC8XD7 · CAGE 04236
06 / NAICS Industries
Which industries classify this contract?
| Code | Description | Obligations | Actions | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 336414 | GUIDED MISSILE AND SPACE VEHICLE MANUFACTURING | $2.07B | 309 | 100.0% |
07 / Products and Services
What products or services were purchased?
| Code | Description | Obligations | Actions | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR35 | R&D- SPACE: FLIGHT (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT) | $2.07B | 309 | 100.0% |
08 / Place of Performance
Where is the work recorded?
LITTLETON, DOUGLAS, COLORADO, UNITED STATES
ZIP 801258500
09 / Contract Actions
What modifications and obligations were recorded?
10 / Reading the Contract
How should this award record be interpreted?
Read the PIID as a transaction history, not as a single purchase price. Net obligations combine the base action with later increases, reductions, corrections, and deobligations recorded under the same contract.
Verify the buyer
Agency and office identify who manages the procurement relationship.
Follow modifications
Each action can change funding, scope, dates, or administrative terms.
Compare the market
Use NAICS, PSC, and the contractor profile to identify related buyers and competitors.