01 / Vendor Profile
MID DAKOTA VEGETATION MANAGEMENT Federal Contracts and Awards
UEI YKSXPXMHSJX3 · CAGE 1PR45
Federal contract activity attributed to this vendor identity across FY 2019–FY 2025. Obligations are FPDS accounting transactions, not company revenue.
02 / Federal Business Size
Federal contract market at a glance
Measured consistently across FY 2019–FY 2025.
Across FY 2019–FY 2025, FPDS records attribute $6.27M in net contract obligations to MID DAKOTA VEGETATION MANAGEMENT across 72 contract actions. Net obligations include positive obligations and later deobligations recorded during the same period.
03 / Spending Trend
MID DAKOTA VEGETATION MANAGEMENT contract spending by year
Annual net obligations show whether recorded federal business expanded or contracted, while actions and customer counts show the breadth of that activity.
Total obligations$276.8K
FY 2025ObligationsHistorical spending range
| Fiscal year | Obligations | Actions | Federal customers | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2019 | $941.7K | 14 | 4 | — |
| FY 2020 | $867.0K | 10 | 5 | −7.9% |
| FY 2021 | $934.7K | 10 | 4 | +7.8% |
| FY 2022 | $807.9K | 8 | 4 | −13.6% |
| FY 2023 | $1.31M | 11 | 4 | +62.2% |
| FY 2024 | $1.14M | 9 | 4 | −13.3% |
| FY 2025 | $276.8K | 10 | 3 | −75.6% |
04 / Federal Customers
Which federal agencies buy from MID DAKOTA VEGETATION MANAGEMENT?
Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.
| Agency | Code | Obligations | Actions | Vendor share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12C2 | $4.00M | 23 | 63.8% | |
| 8900 | $1.23M | 13 | 19.6% | |
| 2100 | $502.6K | 19 | 8.0% | |
| 1450 | $388.6K | 2 | 6.2% | |
| 1422 | $152.0K | 15 | 2.4% |
05 / Contracting Offices
Which contracting offices buy from MID DAKOTA VEGETATION MANAGEMENT?
Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.
| Office | Code | Agency | Obligations | Actions | Vendor share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1240LP | FOREST SERVICE | $2.95M | 11 | 47.0% | |
| 895034 | ENERGY, DEPARTMENT OF | $1.23M | 13 | 19.6% | |
| 1267T0 | FOREST SERVICE | $1.05M | 12 | 16.8% | |
| W9128F | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $502.6K | 19 | 8.0% | |
| 140A16 | BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS | $388.6K | 2 | 6.2% | |
| 140L34 | BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT | $117.1K | 9 | 1.9% | |
| 140L36 | BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT | $34.9K | 6 | 0.6% |
06 / Top NAICS Industries
Which industries define this vendor’s federal work?
07 / Top Product and Service Codes
What products and services does the government buy from this vendor?
| PSC | Description | Obligations | Actions | Customers | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F099 | NATURAL RESOURCES/CONSERVATION- OTHER | $2.96M | 24 | 2 | 47.1% |
| R499 | SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: OTHER | $1.81M | 5 | 1 | 28.8% |
| F006 | NATURAL RESOURCES/CONSERVATION- LAND TREATMENT PRACTICES | $695.0K | 5 | 2 | 11.1% |
| F105 | ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION- PESTICIDES SUPPORT | $334.3K | 9 | 1 | 5.3% |
| F018 | NATURAL RESOURCES/CONSERVATION- OTHER FOREST/RANGE IMPROVEMENTS (NON-CONSTRUCTION) | $174.3K | 17 | 2 | 2.8% |
| S208 | HOUSEKEEPING- LANDSCAPING/GROUNDSKEEPING | $168.3K | 10 | 1 | 2.7% |
| 6840 | PEST CONTROL AGENTS AND DISINFECTANTS | $127.9K | 1 | 1 | 2.0% |
| F001 | NATURAL RESOURCES/CONSERVATION- AERIAL FERTILIZATION/SPRAYING | $9.5K | 1 | 1 | 0.2% |
08 / Competition Pattern
How was MID DAKOTA VEGETATION MANAGEMENT’s federal work competed?
Competition categories describe the procurement path recorded on the underlying contract actions.
09 / Recent Contract Awards
What contract actions were recorded most recently for MID DAKOTA VEGETATION MANAGEMENT?
The latest recorded PIIDs connect this profile to the underlying federal award search.
| Award / PIID | Signed | Obligation | Agency / office | NAICS | PSC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W9128F23P0034 | Aug 4, 2025 | $0 | DEPT OF THE ARMY W071 ENDIST OMAHA | 561730 | S208 |
10 / Interpreting the Profile
How should you evaluate MID DAKOTA VEGETATION MANAGEMENT as a federal contractor?
Read obligations, customers, markets, competition, and individual awards together. A large historical total indicates federal scale, but it does not by itself describe current backlog, commercial revenue, profitability, or future opportunity.
Separate obligations from revenue
FPDS obligations are government accounting actions and may include later deobligations.
Follow customer concentration
Agency and office concentration reveals where the vendor’s federal relationships are strongest.
Test market overlap
NAICS and PSC shares show whether the vendor competes in the same markets as your company.
Inspect the awards
Open the PIIDs to verify dates, offices, classifications, and transaction history.