01 / Vendor Profile
TCOM, L.P. Federal Contracts and Awards
UEI HEZDP5MN11A3 · CAGE 0J6J5
Federal contract activity attributed to this vendor identity across FY 2019–FY 2025. Obligations are FPDS accounting transactions, not company revenue.
02 / Federal Business Size
Federal contract market at a glance
Measured consistently across FY 2019–FY 2025.
Across FY 2019–FY 2025, FPDS records attribute $1.85B in net contract obligations to TCOM, L.P. across 275 contract actions. Net obligations include positive obligations and later deobligations recorded during the same period.
03 / Spending Trend
TCOM, L.P. contract spending by year
Annual net obligations show whether recorded federal business expanded or contracted, while actions and customer counts show the breadth of that activity.
Total obligations$700.65M
FY 2025ObligationsHistorical spending range
| Fiscal year | Obligations | Actions | Federal customers | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2019 | $48.83M | 38 | 3 | — |
| FY 2020 | $176.21M | 27 | 2 | +260.9% |
| FY 2021 | $348.05M | 38 | 3 | +97.5% |
| FY 2022 | $344.33M | 39 | 2 | −1.1% |
| FY 2023 | $132.62M | 49 | 2 | −61.5% |
| FY 2024 | $95.96M | 43 | 2 | −27.6% |
| FY 2025 | $700.65M | 41 | 3 | +630.2% |
04 / Federal Customers
Which federal agencies buy from TCOM, L.P.?
Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.
| Agency | Code | Obligations | Actions | Vendor share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2100 | $1.80B | 189 | 97.4% | |
| 1700 | $54.52M | 83 | 3.0% | |
| 6920 | $223.2K | 1 | 0.0% | |
| 9763 | -$6.19M | 2 | -0.3% |
05 / Contracting Offices
Which contracting offices buy from TCOM, L.P.?
Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.
| Office | Code | Agency | Obligations | Actions | Vendor share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W56KGY | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $1.80B | 189 | 97.4% | |
| M67854 | DEPT OF THE NAVY | $54.52M | 80 | 3.0% | |
| 6973GH | FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION | $223.2K | 1 | 0.0% | |
| N68335 | DEPT OF THE NAVY | $0 | 3 | 0.0% | |
| S2101A | DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DCMA) | -$17.7K | 1 | 0.0% | |
| S2404A | DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DCMA) | -$6.18M | 1 | -0.3% |
06 / Top NAICS Industries
Which industries define this vendor’s federal work?
07 / Top Product and Service Codes
What products and services does the government buy from this vendor?
| PSC | Description | Obligations | Actions | Customers | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J010 | MAINT/REPAIR/REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT- WEAPONS | $753.33M | 29 | 1 | 40.8% |
| 5841 | RADAR EQUIPMENT, AIRBORNE | $563.97M | 136 | 2 | 30.5% |
| J058 | MAINT/REPAIR/REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT- COMMUNICATION, DETECTION, AND COHERENT RADIATION EQUIPMENT | $518.13M | 90 | 2 | 28.1% |
| 5840 | RADAR EQUIPMENT, EXCEPT AIRBORNE | $5.30M | 7 | 1 | 0.3% |
| 1560 | AIRFRAME STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS | $4.00M | 7 | 3 | 0.2% |
| 6830 | GASES: COMPRESSED AND LIQUEFIED | $1.69M | 4 | 1 | 0.1% |
| 5998 | ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ASSEMBLIES, BOARDS, CARDS, AND ASSOCIATED HARDWARE | $223.2K | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| AC12 | R&D- DEFENSE SYSTEM: AIRCRAFT (APPLIED RESEARCH/EXPLORATORY DEVELOPMENT) | $0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
08 / Competition Pattern
How was TCOM, L.P.’s federal work competed?
Competition categories describe the procurement path recorded on the underlying contract actions.
09 / Recent Contract Awards
What contract actions were recorded most recently for TCOM, L.P.?
The latest recorded PIIDs connect this profile to the underlying federal award search.
| Award / PIID | Signed | Obligation | Agency / office | NAICS | PSC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W56KGY25F0139 | Sep 19, 2025 | $624.14M | DEPT OF THE ARMY W6QK ACC-APG | 541330 | J010 |
10 / Interpreting the Profile
How should you evaluate TCOM, L.P. as a federal contractor?
Read obligations, customers, markets, competition, and individual awards together. A large historical total indicates federal scale, but it does not by itself describe current backlog, commercial revenue, profitability, or future opportunity.
Separate obligations from revenue
FPDS obligations are government accounting actions and may include later deobligations.
Follow customer concentration
Agency and office concentration reveals where the vendor’s federal relationships are strongest.
Test market overlap
NAICS and PSC shares show whether the vendor competes in the same markets as your company.
Inspect the awards
Open the PIIDs to verify dates, offices, classifications, and transaction history.