01 / Federal Opportunity Brief
25--ACTUATOR ASSEMBLY,A, IN REPAIR/MODIFICATION OF
02 / Federal Buyer
Who is buying?
03 / Purchase
What is the government buying?
25--ACTUATOR ASSEMBLY,A, IN REPAIR/MODIFICATION OF
The current notice is soliciting this requirement from eligible offerors.
The notice includes scope-related compliance language tied to the “CAV Statement of Work” and requires accurate reporting of transactions with specific timing: “by the end of the fifth regular business day after receipt” and the Action Date entered in CAV must reflect the actual physical receipt date. The evidence does not provide the actual physical deliverables/repair tasks for the actuator beyond these compliance/reporting instructions.
The notice indicates orders may be issued as “CONTRACTS, PURCHASE ORDERS, TASK ORDERS, DELIVERY ORDERS AND MODIFICATIONS.” It also states that such documents are considered “issued” when sent by mail, fax, or other electronic commerce methods such as email. However, the evidence does not name a specific contract vehicle (e.g., IDIQ, BOA) or state the full structure.
The evidence supports that work is assigned via purchase orders, task orders, delivery orders, and modifications, which are treated as “issued” when sent by mail/fax/email. It does not explain how the government selects quantities/items or how tasking decisions are made beyond the issuance timing.
04 / Contracting Requirements
How will this procurement work?
| Requirement | What the notice says | Source status |
|---|---|---|
| Eligibility | No bidder eligibility requirements are stated in the provided evidence excerpt. | Not Disclosed |
| Contract ceiling | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Minimum guarantee | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Contract duration | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Foreign participation | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Proposal and award procedure | The evidence includes a statement that the government’s acceptance of the contractor’s proposal “constitutes bilateral agreement to ‘issue’ contractual documents as detailed herein,” and also shows a submission-like instruction about requesting a variance via the DCMC to the NAVSUP Contracting Officer. However, it does not provide detailed evaluation factors, scoring, or a complete proposal submission package/instructions in the supplied excerpt. | Partially Confirmed |
| Staffing and security | The evidence references a section titled “SECURITY PROHIBITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS (CLASS DEVIATION 2026-O0025).” However, the provided excerpt does not state any specific security clearance level, facility clearance, or staffing/security procedures. | Partially Confirmed |
Read the original SAM.gov description
CONTACT INFORMATION|4|N763.05|P5F|771-229-0468|charles.f.horan4.civ@us.navy.mil| ITEM UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AND VALUATION (JAN 2023)|19|||||||||||||||||||| HIGHER-LEVEL CONTRACT QUALITY REQUIREMENT|8|X|||||||| WIDE AREA WORKFLOW PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS (JAN 2023)|16|Invoice and receiving report combo type |N/A|TBD|N00383|TBD|TBD|See schedule |TBD|||TBD|||||| MONETARY LIMITATION REPAIR PURCHASE ORDERS|1|N/A| NAVY USE OF ABILITYONE SUPPORT CONTRACTOR - RELEASE OF OFFEROR INFORMATION (3-18))|1|| MANDATORY USE OF WORKFLOW PRO (WFP) MOD ASSIST MODULE|1|| WARRANTY OF SUPPLIES OF A NONCOMPLEX NATURE (JUN 2003)|6|12 months |60 days after discovery of defect||||| EQUAL OPPORTUITY FOR WORKERS WITH DISABILITIES (DEV 2026-O0040)(FEB 2026)|4||||| BUY AMERICAN-FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS-BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM-BASIC (FEB 2024)|11|||||||||||| SECURITY PROHIBITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS (CLASS DEVIATION 2026-O0025)(FEB 2026)|7|||||||| BUY AMERICAN-FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS-BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM CERTIFICATE-BASIC (FEB 2024))|5|||||| BUY AMERICAN--BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM CERTIFICATE-BASIC (FEB 2024)|1|| ALTERNATE A, ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (DEVIATION 2026-O0043)(FEB 2026))|13|||||||||||||| ROYALTY INFORMATION (APR 1984)|1|| NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, ANDENERGY PROGRAM USE (APR 2008))|2||x| Repair Turnaround Time (RTAT) definition: The contractual delivery requirement is measured from asset Return to the date of asset acceptance under the terms of the contract. For purposes of this section, Return is defined as physical receipt of the F-condition asset at the contractor?s facility as reflected in the Action Date entry in the Commercial Asset Visibility (CAV) system. In accordance with the CAV Statement of Work, the contractor is required to accurately report all transactions by the end of the fifth regular business day after receipt and the Action Date entered in CAV must be dated to reflect the actual date of physical receipt. The Contractor must obtain final inspection and acceptance by the Government for all assets within the RTATs established in the subsequent contract. Required RTAT: 125 days after receipt of asset. Throughput Constraint: Contractor must provide a throughput Constraint for each NSN(s). Total assets to be repaired monthly after initial delivery commences X/month (contractor fill in #). A throughput of ##____ per month reflects no throughput constraint. InductionExpiration Date: 365 days after contract award date. Any asset received after this date in days is not authorized for repair without bi-lateral agreement between the Contractor and NAVSUP WSS Contracting Officer. Reconciliation: A reconciliation modification will be issued after final Inspection and acceptance of all assets inducted under the subsequent contract. The parties have agreed to a price (shown on the schedule page) for each unit at the negotiated RTAT. Such prices are based on the Contractor meeting the RTAT requirements described within the schedule page. If the Contractor does not meet the applicableRTAT requirement, consideration will be assessed and subject to negotiation. ALL CONTRACTUAL DOCUMENTS (I.E. CONTRACTS, PURCHASE ORDERS, TASK ORDERSDELIVERY ORDERS AND MODIFICATIONS) RELATED TO THE INSTANT PROCUREMENT ARE CONSIDERED TO BE "ISSUED" BY THE GOVERNMENT WHEN COPIES ARE EITHER DEPOSITED IN THE MAIL, TRANSMITTED BY FACSIMILE, OR SENT BY OTHER ELECTRONIC COMMERCE METHODS, SUCH AS EMAIL. THE GOVERNMENT'S ACCEPTANCE OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL CONSTITUTES BILATERAL AGREEMENT TO "ISSUE" CONTRACTUAL DOCUMENTS AS DETAILED HEREIN. Early and incremental deliveries accepted and preferred. \ 1. SCOPE 1.1 . Markings shall be in accordance with MIL-STD-130. 1.2 Articles to be furnished hereunder shall be repaired, tested andinspected in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in theRequirements Section of this document. 1.3 Unless expressly provided for elsewhere in this clause, equipment suchas fixtures, jigs, dies, patterns, mylars, special tooling, test equipment, orany other manufacturing aid required for the manufacture and/or testing of the subject item(s) will not be provided by the Government or any other source and is the sole responsibility of the contractor. The foregoing applies notwithstanding any reference to such equipment or the furnishing thereof that may be contained in any drawing or referenced specification. 1.4 The use of MIL-W-81381 wire in any item to be delivered under this procurement is prohibited. The foregoing prohibition applies notwithstanding any reference to MIL-W-81381 wire that may be made in any of the drawings or specifications for this procurement. SAE-AS22759 series wire shall be used in lieu of MIL-W-81381 wire, in any place where MIL-W-81381 wire is cited in this procurement. Any questions concerning this requirement should be directed to the Procuring Contracting Officer. 1.5 If MIL-STD-454 is referenced in the drawings or in the specification,the contractor is expected to show compliance with IPC/EIAJ-STD-001C Personnel performing tasks in accordance with IPC/EIAJ-STD-001C shall be trained and certified as requried by IPC/EIAJ-STD-001C paragraph 5.1.4. 2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS - NOT APPLICABLE 3. REQUIREMENTS The contractor shall maintain a quality control system which meets the requirements of Mil-I-45208A, Mil-Q 9858,ISO-9000 / 9001 / 9002 or equivalent. RESPONSIBILITY FOR INSPECTION: Unless otherwise specified, the contractor is responsible for the performance of all inspection requirements as specified herein. Except as otherwise specified, the contractor may use his own or any other facility suitable for the performance of the inspection requirements specified herein. PROCEDURES:The contractor shall prepare and maintain Quality Control Documentation, test and repair procedures, and inspection procedures which shall be made available to the Government for review and approval. The procedures shall include sequential diagrams of the test, repair, and inspection process, as well as the performance spcifications to perform the procedures. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM PLAN: The contractor shall develop, implement and maintain a Repair Quality Plan in compliance with the requirements of Mil-I-45208A, Mil-Q-9858, ISO,9000 / 9001 / 9002, or equvalent.The plan shall define the specific methods by which compliance with contractual requirements will be assured. All quality assurance data shall be provided to the Government for review and approval upon request. PURCHASED MATERIAL CONTROL: The contractor shall establish and maintain a system of control over purchased material which shall assure that the necessary requirements of this contract are included. in all sub contract agreements. A parts control system shall establish a record of performance for each purchased and internally manufactured part and shall be used to evaluate continued use of the source. The contractors control system shall be in compliance wil either Mil-I 45208A/Mil-Q-9858 or equivalent Quality Quality Assurance Standared.(ISO/AS:9000, 9001, 9002). RECEIVING INSPECTION OF PURCHASED MATERIAL: Purchased items shall be inspected upon receipt at the contractors facility to assure conformance with all requirements of the Technical Data Package (TDP). Evidence of such inspections shall be maintained for Government review at least twelve (12) months following acceptance of the end item. Inspection reports shall be maintained by the contractor. The inspection report shall, at a minimum, include a record of all dimensional data (coordinate/positional), material, finish, and process with appropriate pass/fail criteria, such ascertifications, and actual dimensional readings. FAILURE ANALYSIS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION:All failure analysis and corrective action reports/plans shall be submitted to the Government. NONCONFORMING MATERIAL:The contractor shall establish an effective system for controlling nonconforming material including procedures for identification, segregation, and disposition. CONTRACTOR INTERNAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB):IRB authority is delegated to the contractor for this contract only. The IRB may be used only for disposition of materials exhibiting minor non-conformances, scrap or rework to return a part to conformance with drawings or specifications as authorized by the approved repair procedures.IRB shall not use "AS-IS" disposition. A complete file of IRB actions shall be maintained for review by the Government for concurrance of classification. MATERIAL REVIEW BOARD (MRB):Formal MRB authority for disposition of "AS-IS"and for minor non-conformances is retained by the Government. The contractor shall submit the appropriate request for Variance via the DCMC to the NAVSUP Contracting Officer. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COMPLIANCE: All items must meet all requirements of this Statement of Work. The inspection requirements set forth in this SOW shall become part of the contractors overall inspection system or quality program. The absence of any inspection requirements in the SOW shall not relieve the contractor of the responsibility of assuring that all Government equipment submitted for acceptance comply with all requirements. Sampling in quality conformance does not authorize submission of known defective items, either indicated or actual, nor does it commit the procuring activity to acceptance of any defective items. REPAIR ASSESSMENT TESTING: The Government may select samples of the Contract Line Items (CLINS) which have completed repair and have been accepted by the Government representative for the purpose of conducting performance testing, environmental testing, and quality conformance examination in a repair assessment test program. A quantity of CLIN's may be randomly selected from each quaterly repair production completion for shipment to the CFA or other Government designated location to conduct this testing. RECORDS OF DATA COLLECTION: The contractor shall maintain a historical record file to contain copies of applicable data and documents for individual CLIN's and assemblies by CLIN serial number. The historical record file shall include,but not be limited to the following types of historical records: Receipt inspection documentation. Repair shop travelers or repair cards. Parts replacement records. Parts inspection data before and after repair as applicable. Acceptance test data. QA personnel shall maintain a complete receipt inspection,test, repair re-test, history card for each item processed. This information shall be made available to the Government upon request. 3.1 1.0 GENERAL 3.1.1 This Statement of Work (SOW) establishes the criteria for repair and testing /inspection of the subject item. It includes inspection, component repair and replacement,reassembly and testing procedures required to return units back into a servicable condition. 3.2 2.0 DEFINITIONS. 3.2.1 CONTRACTOR: Is defined as the successful offeror awarded a contract, orderor issued a project work order. The term "contract" encompasses a contract, an order, or a project work order. 3.2.2 OVERHAUL: An overhauled part is one which has been disassembled, cleaned, inspected, repaired as necessary (by replacing or repairing all components which have been found to exceed limits established by the repair/overhaul manual) reassembled and tested in accordance with the approved repair/overhaul manual listed in this SOW and returned to a Ready for Issue (RFI) condition (Refer to contract schedule for items to be overhauled). 3.2.3 REPAIR: A repaired part is one which has been restored to a Ready for Issue(RFI) condition (by replacing or repairing those components found to be defective, broken, damaged or inoperative during the initial evaluation and troubleshooting phase) and tested in accordance with the approved repair/overhaul manual listed in this SOW (Refer to contract schedule for items to be repaired). 3.3 3.0 SCOPE 3.3.1 GENERAL. The items to be furnished hereunder s
05 / Historical Spending Trend
How has spending on the selected comparable contracts changed?
The same closed fiscal-year window and the same complete comparable-contract set are used throughout this Brief. Net obligations total $40.61M across 7 fiscal years.

| Fiscal year | Comparable obligations | Actions | Vendors |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2019 | $5.09M | 68 | 42 |
| FY 2020 | $7.33M | 41 | 24 |
| FY 2021 | $8.40M | 41 | 23 |
| FY 2022 | $470.5K | 21 | 14 |
| FY 2023 | -$10.1K | 4 | 4 |
| FY 2024 | $17.31M | 10 | 6 |
| FY 2025 | $2.02M | 5 | 4 |
06 / Related Historical Awards
Which contracts support the comparison?
No direct contract reference was found. 15 broad matches are shown as supporting context.

| Contract | Vendor | Latest activity | Office | NAICS / PSC | Match | Obligations | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N0038318FP300 | MPC PRODUCTS CORPORATION | Feb 15, 2023 | NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 336413 / 1680 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | -$102.4K | 3 |
| N0038321FX80J | BELL TEXTRON INC. | Oct 28, 2021 | NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 336413 / 2925 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | -$82.1K | 1 |
| N0038320PN045 | SAFRAN DATA SYSTEMS INC. | Apr 22, 2021 | NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 332710 / 5836 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | -$23.5K | 1 |
| N0038321FX803 | BELL TEXTRON INC. | Jan 20, 2021 | NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 336413 / 1680 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $141.7K | 1 |
| N0038319FP300 | MPC PRODUCTS CORPORATION | Dec 22, 2020 | NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 336413 / 1680 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | -$224.7K | 4 |
| N0038317PH039 | MPC PRODUCTS CORPORATION | Nov 4, 2020 | NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 336413 / 6105 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | -$148.0K | 3 |
| N0038318P022H | AERO TURBINE, INC | Mar 25, 2020 | NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 336412 / 2915 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | -$47.5K | 1 |
| 0025 | ROCKWELL COLLINS-ESA VISION SYSTEMS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY | Apr 18, 2019 | NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 336413 / 1680 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | -$8.3K | 1 |
| N0038318F0A32 | BOEING COMPANY, THE | Mar 14, 2019 | NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 336413 / 5998 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $0 | 1 |
| N0038325FEA03 | THE BOEING COMPANY | Dec 11, 2025 | NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 336413 / 1680 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $665.5K | 2 |
| N0038325FAV07 | TRIUMPH ACTUATION SYSTEMS - YAKIMA, LLC | Aug 28, 2025 | NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 336413 / 1680 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $1.35M | 1 |
| N0038325FX90P | SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION | Jan 29, 2025 | NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 336413 / 1680 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $16.9K | 2 |
| N0038324FX93L | SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION | Sep 26, 2024 | NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 336413 / 5340 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $17.27M | 1 |
| 7014 | NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION | Mar 20, 2024 | NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 336413 / 1710 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | -$30.9K | 11 |
| N0038318FHV03 | NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION | Mar 20, 2024 | NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 336413 / 1710 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | -$354.6K | 5 |
07 / Contractor Evidence
Which contractors have performed related work?
Historical contractors are ranked by direct procurement-family evidence and comparable contract activity. The table distinguishes connected holders from broader performers without identifying unverified bidders.
No directly connected predecessor was identified. The companies below are historical performers selected from the comparable contract set; none is identified as a bidder.

| Company | Evidence | Fit | Why included | Contracts | Actions | Obligations | Latest activity | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION UEI UTJWTSLMFNG4 · CAGE 78286 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 2 | 3 | $17.29M | Jan 29, 2025 | GETWAB profile |
| TRIUMPH ACTUATION SYSTEMS - YAKIMA, LLC UEI FX2XH55L2458 · CAGE 97415 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 1 | $1.35M | Aug 28, 2025 | GETWAB profile |
| THE BOEING COMPANY UEI WZWRLY4G3PL8 · CAGE 81205 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 2 | $665.5K | Dec 11, 2025 | GETWAB profile Verified via SAM Entities Official website |
| MPC PRODUCTS CORPORATION UEI N77BPJK25ZM4 · CAGE 19710 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 3 | 10 | -$475.0K | Feb 15, 2023 | GETWAB profile |
| NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION UEI HUDHMPV9B6M9 · CAGE 04804 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 2 | 16 | -$385.5K | Mar 20, 2024 | GETWAB profile |
| BELL TEXTRON INC. UEI N5QUZAYGPKM3 · CAGE 97499 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 2 | 2 | $59.7K | Oct 28, 2021 | GETWAB profile |
| AERO TURBINE, INC UEI LUMJB673C9K9 · CAGE 0T790 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 1 | -$47.5K | Mar 25, 2020 | GETWAB profile Verified via SAM Entities Official website |
| SAFRAN DATA SYSTEMS INC. UEI DVYZAD8GXL45 · CAGE 1UAE7 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 1 | -$23.5K | Apr 22, 2021 | GETWAB profile Verified via SAM Entities Official website |
| ROCKWELL COLLINS-ESA VISION SYSTEMS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY UEI Y3MNMYARMEK8 · CAGE 6VSE4 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 1 | -$8.3K | Apr 18, 2019 | GETWAB profile |
| BOEING COMPANY, THE UEI MF2LE5RK6L84 · CAGE 0PXV4 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 1 | $0 | Mar 14, 2019 | GETWAB profile Verified via SAM Entities Official website |
08 / Competitive Landscape
How was comparable work competed?
Competition treatment is calculated from exactly the same closed-period contract set used in Sections 5–7. It describes historical actions, not the outcome of this solicitation.

| FPDS treatment | Code | Actions | Obligations | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not competed | C | 101 | $34.91M | 82.6% |
| Full and open competition | A | 38 | $6.53M | 15.5% |
| Full and open after exclusion of sources | D | 27 | -$403.3K | 1.0% |
| Not competed under simplified acquisition procedures | G | 11 | -$393.8K | 0.9% |
| Competed under simplified acquisition procedures | F | 12 | -$34.4K | 0.1% |
| Not available for competition | B | 1 | -$700 | 0.0% |
09 / Procurement History
How was this opportunity published and updated?
2 SAM.gov notice records were resolved into this procurement family. The chronology shows how the requirement was published and updated.
| Notice | Type | Posted | Response deadline | Status | Official source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N0038327QSA02 25--ACTUATOR ASSEMBLY,A, IN REPAIR/MODIFICATION OF | Presolicitation | Oct 7, 2026 | Nov 23, 2026 12:00 AM GMT-0400 | Active | View on SAM.gov |
| N0038327QSA02 Current Brief record 25--ACTUATOR ASSEMBLY,A, IN REPAIR/MODIFICATION OF | Solicitation | Oct 23, 2026 | Nov 23, 2026 4:30 PM GMT-0400 | Active | View on SAM.gov |
10 / NAICS and PSC Market Context
How large is the selected comparable market?
Classification codes organize the evidence; they do not prove that every contract in the broader NAICS or PSC market matches this requirement.
11 / Capture Signals and Risks
What should be validated before committing capture resources?
Capture signals separate verified procurement-family evidence from unresolved requirements and market-only indicators.
Direct procurement-family evidence
No direct award record found
Buyer proximity
15 comparable record(s) share the contracting office
Eligibility
Not disclosed in the indexed notice
Unresolved requirement fields
7
12 / Who Should Pursue
When does this opportunity fit?
- Your team can demonstrate recent, relevant delivery in 25--ACTUATOR ASSEMBLY,A, IN REPAIR/MODIFICATION OF.
- You can perform under the stated acquisition model: The notice indicates orders may be issued as “CONTRACTS, PURCHASE ORDERS, TASK ORDERS, DELIVERY ORDERS AND MODIFICATIONS.” It also states that such documents are considered “issued” when sent by mail, fax, or other electronic commerce metho
- You can show credible past performance for NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT or a closely related federal customer.
- Your technical scope fits, but you lack demonstrated history with NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT.
- You need a specialist teammate to close unresolved staffing, security, or detailed-scope requirements before committing.
- Your delivery model cannot support the stated contract vehicle or order-based work structure.
- The unresolved requirements shown above cannot be validated before committing proposal resources.



