01 / Federal Opportunity Brief
C-208/PC-12 Special Missions Aircrew & Maintenance Training
- Status
- Active
- Deadline
- Oct 28, 2026 1:00 PM GMT-0500
- Solicitation
- FA3002-FMS-C-208_PC-12
- Updated
- Sep 29, 2026
- NAICS
- 611512
02 / Federal Buyer
Who is buying?
03 / Purchase
What is the government buying?
C-208/PC-12 Special Missions Aircrew & Maintenance Training
The current notice is soliciting this requirement from eligible offerors.
The provided evidence describes potential training support for pilot, Mission Systems Operator (MSO), and Loadmaster (LM) training, and includes deliverables such as aircraft for training, maintenance documentation/technical data/parts support/maintenance-record training, and student documentation for end-of-training pilot certification.
The notice is an RFI for market research. It does not describe a specific contract vehicle, ordering mechanism, or acquisition structure beyond planning for a potential requirement.
The contractor is expected to support aircraft training and related training support services, including providing or supporting aircraft used for training, instructors, student documentation for certification, and maintenance/related support (including CLS when aircraft are outside CONUS).
04 / Contracting Requirements
How will this procurement work?
| Requirement | What the notice says | Source status |
|---|---|---|
| Eligibility | The notice identifies the NAICS and SBA size standard amount. It asks industry respondents to indicate what aircraft/configurations they currently support, but it does not state formal bid eligibility requirements or go/no-go capability thresholds. | Partially Confirmed |
| Contract ceiling | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Minimum guarantee | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Contract duration | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Foreign participation | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Proposal and award procedure | The government is not requesting a formal quote or binding pricing under this RFI. The notice also requests specific questions for industry respondents, but the provided evidence does not describe evaluation/scoring factors or detailed submission instructions beyond the question topics. | Partially Confirmed |
| Staffing and security | The notice requests information about instructor staffing levels and surge capacity, and it references instructors, but it does not provide specific instructor qualification requirements or any security/clearance requirements in the provided evidence. | Partially Confirmed |
Read the original SAM.gov description
1. Title: Request for Information (RFI): Foreign Military Sales – C208/PC12 Aircraft Training Services and Related Training Support Services 2. Purpose: The Air Force Installation Contracting Center (AFICC) 338th Enterprise Sourcing Squadron (ESS) is conducting market research for the Air Education and Training Command (AETC) Air Force Security Assistance Training (AFSAT) Squadron to identify capable commercial sources that may be able to provide aircraft training and support services for the Cessna 208B Caravan EX (C208) aircraft with Garmin 1000 avionics and Pilatus PC-12 NG aircraft with Honeywell Primus Apex. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code is 611512 – Flight Training, Small Business Administration (SBA) Small Business Size Standard is $34M. AFSAT seeks information to identify potential sources and gather information regarding industry capability, capacity, experience, training methods, facilities, simulators or training devices, instructor qualifications, maintenance-training capabilities, and other related services supporting aircrew and maintenance personnel for the C-208/PC-12 platforms. The information requested by this RFI is for market research only and will be used by the Air Force Multi-Functional Team (MFT) to assist in acquisition planning for potential future requirements. Responses to this RFI will be used for planning and market-research purposes only. 3. Background: AFSAT has a potential requirement for contractor-provided training support associated with C-208 and PC-12 aircraft operations and sustainment. The anticipated support may include initial, recurrent, mission-specific, maintenance, and other aircraft-related training for Government personnel and International Military Students (IMS). The Department of War (DOW) training venues do not have existing capacity to support the additional requirement of Cessna 208 Mission Pilot, Mission Systems Operator (MSO) and Load Master (LM) training, in the Airland/Airdrop/ISR/ Night Vision Goggle (NVG) mission sets and Pilatus PC-12 Mission Pilot, MSO and LM training, in the Airland/Airdrop/ISR/NVG mission sets. The Government is interested in identifying sources capable of supporting training at contractor facilities, Government facilities, or other mutually agreed locations internationally, as applicable. 3. Potential Scope of Training Support AETC/A3F and AFSAT are tasked with providing pilot, Mission Systems Operator (MSO) and Loadmaster (LM) training services for its government personnel and international partners. Due to the nature and extent of personnel that require training throughout the USA and internationally, the required Contractor support services include flying training to meet the needs of the Air Force (AF) mission and the flying training requirements of our international partners. The Contractor shall obtain aircraft for use in training, maintenance of the aircraft and/or related equipment while in CONUS (OCONUS will require Contracted Logistics Support (CLS)), aircrew instructors, and student documentation for certification of pilots at the end of the training. None of the training includes combat missions or services that are intended to determine pilot requirements for readiness by the AF and AFSAT. The AF and AFSAT will utilize the Cessna 208B EX Garmin 1000 aircraft and Pilatus PC-12 Honeywell Primus APEX. The AF mission will extend over to aircrew international military operations where support for foreign language assistance is needed (interpreters as required). Currency training is also an on-going need as students are at various levels or phases of pilot experience. This educational element will require continuous learning certification to maintain aircrew flying currency and proficiency for USG and international personnel respectively. Interested vendors shall describe their ability to provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, non-personal services, and other items necessary to perform aircrew, maintenance, and training services for Cessna 208/Pilatus PC-12 platforms. Training includes: Mission Pilot, MSO and LM in the Airland/Airdrop/ISR/NVG mission sets and could include some or all of the following services: 3.1 Aircrew Training Support Services Potential aircrew training may include: Initial and recurrent pilot training. Ground school instruction. Aircraft systems training. Normal, abnormal, emergency, and emergency-procedure training. Flight training and proficiency events. Instrument Flight rules (IFR) training, as applicable. Crew Resource Management (CRM) or equivalent crew-coordination training. Mission-oriented training tailored to Government operational requirements, if applicable. Instructor pilot and standardization support. Check airman or evaluation support, if applicable and authorized. Training records administration and student performance tracking. Computer-based training, distributed learning, and instructor-led classroom instruction. 3.2 Aircraft Maintenance Training Support Services Potential maintenance training may include: Initial and recurrent maintenance technician training. Airframe, powerplant, avionics, electrical, and aircraft systems training. Troubleshooting, fault isolation, inspection, servicing, repair, and replacement procedures. Engine maintenance training, including applicable manufacturer-supported maintenance practices. Propeller, landing gear, environmental, fuel, hydraulic, electrical, and avionics-system instruction, as applicable. Maintenance documentation, technical data, parts support, and maintenance-record training. Maintenance human factors and safety training. Train-the-trainer or instructor development programs. Specialized training for field-level, intermediate-level, or organizational-level maintenance personnel, as applicable. 3.3 Additional Training and Support Services Interested vendors should also identify their capability to provide: Flight training devices (FTDs), full-flight simulators, fixed-base simulators, or other training devices. Simulator-based emergency-procedure and instrument training. Aircraft-specific courseware development, revision, and sustainment. Training needs analysis and curriculum development. Mobile training teams (MTTs). On-site or deployed training support. Training program management and scheduling. Student training records, certificates, and completion documentation. Training program quality assurance and continuous-improvement processes. Training facility support, classrooms, briefing rooms, and equipment. Training materials, technical publications, and student handouts. Training support for avionics upgrades, aircraft modifications, or mission equipment, if applicable. Ability to provide housing and ground transportation for international students Other related training services not listed above. 4. Requested Vendor Information Interested sources are requested to provide the following information: 4.1 Company Information Company name. Unique Entity Identifier (UEI), if applicable. Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code, if applicable. Business address. Primary point of contact, including name, title, telephone number, and email address. Company website. Business size and socioeconomic status, if applicable. Relevant certifications, approvals, licenses, and authorizations. 4.2 Relevant Experience Provide a summary of experience delivering training for: Cessna 208-series aircraft, including the 208B Caravan EX, if applicable. Pilatus PC-12 aircraft, including applicable variants. Comparable single-engine turboprop aircraft, if direct C-208 or PC-12 experience is limited. Government, military, law-enforcement, commercial, or international customers, as appropriate. For each relevant effort, provide: Customer type or organization, if releasable. Period of performance. Aircraft platform supported. Nature and approximate scale of training provided. Types of personnel trained. Training locations. Use of simulators, training devices, aircraft, or mobile training teams. Lessons learned or notable capabilities relevant to this requirement. 4.3 Training Capability Describe the vendor’s capability to provide: Initial and recurrent aircrew training. Maintenance training. Aircraft systems and emergency-procedure training. Instructor-led, simulator-based, computer-based, and blended-learning options. Training at contractor facilities, Government locations, and austere or deployed locations. Concurrent training for multiple student cohorts. Training during standard and nonstandard duty hours, if required. Training records management and reporting. 4.4 Facilities, Aircraft, and Training Devices Identify available training resources, including: Training locations and facility capacities. C-208 and/or PC-12 aircraft available for training. Type, location, configuration, and availability of simulators or training devices. Whether training devices are approved, certified, or otherwise recognized by applicable aviation authorities. Classroom, maintenance-training, and hands-on practical-training capabilities. Availability of mobile or deployable training equipment. 4.5 Instructor and Staff Qualifications Describe instructor and support-staff qualifications, including: Pilot instructor qualifications and flight experience. Maintenance instructor qualifications and relevant aircraft experience. Evaluator, check airman, standardization, or quality-assurance experience, if applicable. Instructor staffing levels and surge capacity. Background-screening or credentialing capabilities, if required. Experience supporting Government or military aviation training programs. 4.6 Courseware and Curriculum Describe available courseware and curriculum for C-208 and/or PC-12 training, including: Existing courses and course durations. Training objectives and instructional methods. Ability to tailor curriculum to Government requirements. Ability to develop new courseware or update existing material. Availability of electronic courseware, learning management systems, and training records. Process for maintaining currency with aircraft configuration changes, technical publications, and manufacturer updates. 4.7 Quality, Safety, and Compliance Describe: Training quality-management processes. Aviation safety-management practices. Instructor standardization and quality-control processes. Student evaluation, remediation, and failure-management procedures. Relevant Federal Aviation Administration, foreign aviation authority, manufacturer, or industry approvals. Any applicable quality certifications or accreditations. Compliance with relevant international regulations and standards (e.g., ICAO, ITAR, EAR). Experience in addressing cultural considerations and the specific operation requirements of partner nations under the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) program. Experience with international students using interpreters and translated courseware. 4.8 Pricing and Contracting Information For planning purposes only, provide pricing strategy, structure or methodology for: Contract Type Pricing methodology: Aircrew training rate per-student or instructor hours. Maintenance training rate per-student or instructor hours. Same or different methodology for initial and/or recurrent training. Daily or weekly mobile training team. Simulator or training-device usage. Courseware development or modification costs. Travel, lodging, aircraft, equipment, and other potential cost drivers. Minimum class sizes, lead times, cancellation terms, and scheduling constraints. The Government is not requesting a formal quote or binding pricing under this RFI. 5. Specific Questions for Industry Respondents are requested to address the following questions, as applicable: Which C-208 and/or PC-12 aircraft models, variants, avionics suites, and configurations does your organization currently support for training? What aircrew initial and recurrent training courses are currently
05 / Historical Spending Trend
How has spending on the selected comparable contracts changed?
The same closed fiscal-year window and the same complete comparable-contract set are used throughout this Brief. Net obligations total $36.23M across 7 fiscal years.

| Fiscal year | Comparable obligations | Actions | Vendors |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2019 | $7.27M | 7 | 5 |
| FY 2020 | $3.22M | 9 | 5 |
| FY 2021 | $6.13M | 8 | 4 |
| FY 2022 | $1.15M | 5 | 3 |
| FY 2023 | $6.46M | 6 | 3 |
| FY 2024 | $7.56M | 7 | 4 |
| FY 2025 | $4.44M | 3 | 2 |
06 / Related Historical Awards
Which contracts support the comparison?
No direct contract reference was found. 10 broad matches are shown as supporting context.

| Contract | Vendor | Latest activity | Office | NAICS / PSC | Match | Obligations | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA300219FA069 | SIERRA NEVADA CORPORATION | Jul 31, 2019 | FA3002 338 ESS CC | 611512 / U006 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $0 | 1 |
| FA300224F0143 | DISCOVERY MACHINE, INC. | Sep 25, 2024 | FA3002 338 ESS CC | 511210 / R408 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $2.57M | 1 |
| FA300217F0167 | TUKUH TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | May 26, 2023 | FA3002 338 ESS CC | 541611 / R408 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | -$14.4K | 1 |
| FA300219FA193 | SMS DATA PRODUCTS GROUP, INC. | Sep 14, 2021 | FA3002 338 ESS CC | 517110 / D316 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $976.7K | 2 |
| FA300225F0041 | GSD&M LLC | Jan 29, 2025 | FA3002 338 ESS CC | 541810 / R701 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $2.48M | 1 |
| FA300221F0020 | 1CYBERFORCE LLC | Feb 9, 2023 | FA3002 338 ESS CC | 541511 / DE01 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $669.7K | 1 |
| FA300220F0145 | MVATION WORLDWIDE INC. | Sep 16, 2021 | FA3002 338 ESS CC | 334111 / 7030 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $1.88M | 2 |
| FA300220F0095 | GSD&M LLC | Jun 25, 2020 | FA3002 338 ESS CC | 541810 / R701 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $485.5K | 1 |
| FA300219FA107 | GSD&M LLC | May 4, 2020 | FA3002 338 ESS CC | 541810 / R701 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $577.6K | 2 |
| FA300218C0002 | WORLDVIEW SOLUTIONS, INC | Oct 2, 2019 | FA3002 338 ESS CC | 541511 / D308 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $71.2K | 2 |
07 / Contractor Evidence
Which contractors have performed related work?
Historical contractors are ranked by direct procurement-family evidence and comparable contract activity. The table distinguishes connected holders from broader performers without identifying unverified bidders.
No directly connected predecessor was identified. The companies below are historical performers selected from the comparable contract set; none is identified as a bidder.

| Company | Evidence | Fit | Why included | Contracts | Actions | Obligations | Latest activity | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSD&M LLC UEI XYJXY3CL7K87 · CAGE 1PWR1 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 3 | 4 | $3.54M | Jan 29, 2025 | GETWAB profile Verified via SAM Entities Official website |
| DISCOVERY MACHINE, INC. UEI JJ9BBEJC9K18 · CAGE 1PL43 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 1 | $2.57M | Sep 25, 2024 | GETWAB profile Verified via SAM Entities Official website |
| MVATION WORLDWIDE INC. UEI HNFLF1JCTF37 · CAGE 80Q48 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 2 | $1.88M | Sep 16, 2021 | GETWAB profile Verified via SAM Entities Official website |
| SMS DATA PRODUCTS GROUP, INC. UEI JLAZY7RHKPJ3 · CAGE 2S373 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 2 | $976.7K | Sep 14, 2021 | GETWAB profile Verified via SAM Entities Official website |
| 1CYBERFORCE LLC UEI FKW1ZBZ2PAC2 · CAGE 7VSJ2 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 1 | $669.7K | Feb 9, 2023 | GETWAB profile Verified via SAM Entities Official website |
| WORLDVIEW SOLUTIONS, INC UEI UYGJZA1LFHF9 · CAGE 4JWR4 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 2 | $71.2K | Oct 2, 2019 | GETWAB profile Verified via SAM Entities Official website |
| TUKUH TECHNOLOGIES, LLC UEI D1M5NDD3LLL7 · CAGE 7ETB7 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 1 | -$14.4K | May 26, 2023 | GETWAB profile Verified via GSA eLibrary Official website |
| SIERRA NEVADA CORPORATION UEI DD2QET4D27T3 · CAGE 8X691 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 1 | $0 | Jul 31, 2019 | GETWAB profile Verified via SAM Entities Official website |
08 / Competitive Landscape
How was comparable work competed?
Competition treatment is calculated from exactly the same closed-period contract set used in Sections 5–7. It describes historical actions, not the outcome of this solicitation.

| FPDS treatment | Code | Actions | Obligations | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full and open after exclusion of sources | D | 26 | $26.29M | 72.5% |
| Full and open competition | A | 8 | $5.42M | 14.9% |
| Not competed | C | 10 | $4.54M | 12.5% |
| Not available for competition | B | 1 | -$14.4K | 0.0% |
09 / Procurement History
How was this opportunity published and updated?
One SAM.gov notice record was resolved for this procurement family.
| Notice | Type | Posted | Response deadline | Status | Official source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA3002-FMS-C-208_PC-12 Current Brief record C-208/PC-12 Special Missions Aircrew & Maintenance Training | Sources Sought | Sep 28, 2026 | Oct 28, 2026 1:00 PM GMT-0500 | Active | View on SAM.gov |
10 / NAICS and PSC Market Context
How large is the selected comparable market?
Classification codes organize the evidence; they do not prove that every contract in the broader NAICS or PSC market matches this requirement.
11 / Capture Signals and Risks
What should be validated before committing capture resources?
Capture signals separate verified procurement-family evidence from unresolved requirements and market-only indicators.
Direct procurement-family evidence
No direct award record found
Buyer proximity
10 comparable record(s) share the contracting office
Eligibility
Not disclosed in the indexed notice
Unresolved requirement fields
7
12 / Who Should Pursue
When does this opportunity fit?
- Your team can demonstrate recent, relevant delivery in C-208/PC-12 Special Missions Aircrew & Maintenance Training.
- Your company can document the stated eligibility conditions: The notice identifies the NAICS and SBA size standard amount. It asks industry respondents to indicate what aircraft/configurations they currently support, but it does not state formal bid eligibility requirements or go/no-go capability thresholds.
- You can perform under the stated acquisition model: The notice is an RFI for market research. It does not describe a specific contract vehicle, ordering mechanism, or acquisition structure beyond planning for a potential requirement.
- You can show credible past performance for FA3002 338 ESS CC or a closely related federal customer.
- Your technical scope fits, but you lack demonstrated history with FA3002 338 ESS CC.
- You need a specialist teammate to close unresolved staffing, security, or detailed-scope requirements before committing.
- You cannot satisfy or verify the stated eligibility conditions: The notice identifies the NAICS and SBA size standard amount. It asks industry respondents to indicate what aircraft/configurations they currently support, but it does not state formal bid eligibility requirements or go/no-go capability thresholds.
- Your delivery model cannot support the stated contract vehicle or order-based work structure.
- The unresolved requirements shown above cannot be validated before committing proposal resources.



