GETWAB

01 / Federal Opportunity Brief

F-15EX Missile Warning System

Status
Active
Deadline
Nov 12, 2026 4:00 PM GMT-0500
Solicitation
PCOL-2026-MWS
Updated
Sep 30, 2026
NAICS
334511
PSC
5865

02 / Federal Buyer

Who is buying?

03 / Purchase

What is the government buying?

Requirement

F-15EX Missile Warning System
The current notice is soliciting this requirement from eligible offerors.

Scope available now

The system must alert F-15EX aircrew to missile threats without unreasonably distracting them with false alarms, and it must be an integrated MWS solution for F-15EX using the pre-existing sensor locations/cabling/cooling. It is intended for rapid integration into the F-15EX fleet.

Contract vehicle

The notice is a Sources Sought (market research). It is not an RFP, RFQ, or IFB, and it does not constitute a solicitation or commitment by the Government.

How work is assigned

The Government seeks an operationally qualified threat missile launch and approach warning system for rapid integration into the F-15EX. The system must use six pre-existing sensor locations, data/power cables, and cooling, and must be easily, safely, rapidly, and organically installable/removable in the field by USAF military aircraft maintenance personnel.

04 / Contracting Requirements

How will this procurement work?

RequirementWhat the notice saysSource status
EligibilityResponses must include company contact information, CAGE/UEI/DUNS, and a capabilities statement (up to six pages). Respondents should indicate their business size/type (large/small and specified small business categories).Confirmed
Contract ceilingNot disclosedNot Disclosed
Minimum guaranteeNot disclosedNot Disclosed
Contract durationNot disclosedNot Disclosed
Foreign participationNot disclosedNot Disclosed
Proposal and award procedureThe notice provides that it is not an RFP/RFQ/IFB. It does require responses to include certain information (company contact and capabilities statement), and it includes questions respondents should answer. No specific evaluation factors/scoring for award are provided (consistent with this being market research).Partially Confirmed
Staffing and securityNo staffing roles/requirements or security clearance requirements are stated in the supplied evidence.Not Disclosed
Read the original SAM.gov description

The Department of the Air Force, Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC), Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC), Fighters & Advanced Aircraft Directorate (AFLCMC/WA), F?15 System Program Office (AFLCMC/WAQ), Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (WPAFB) is seeking sources for the procurement of an operationally qualified threat missile launch and approach warning system for rapid integration into the United States Air Force (USAF) F-15EX Eagle II fighter aircraft. INTRODUCTION: This is a SOURCES SOUGHT ANNOUNCEMENT to acquire a missile warning system (MWS) to be integrated into the F-15EX fleet. The system must alert the F-15EX aircrew to missile threats without unreasonably distracting the aircrew with false alarms. The MWS must use the six pre-existing sensor locations, data cables, power cables, and cooling. The MWS must be easily, safely, rapidly, and organically installable and removable in the field by USAF military aircraft maintenance personnel. In accordance with Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulation Overhaul (RFO) Part 10, Market Research, AFLCMC/WAQ is seeking information for potential sources for an integrated MWS solution for the F-15EX. This publication is intended to elicit responses from sources with knowledge, skills, data, equipment, access to appropriate facilities, and the capacity to meet the Air Force’s requirements. The dollar value and period of performance (PoP) for the contract will be commensurate with the requirement. This contract effort is subject to RFO 52.232-18, Availability of Funds. 1.1 SOURCES SOUGHT INFORMATION 1.2 DISCLAIMER: THIS?SOURCES SOUGHT?IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.? THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP), REQUEST FOR QUOTE (RFQ) OR AN INVITATION FOR BID (IFB).?IN ACCORDANCE WITH?RFO 15.101(c),?THIS NOTICE?DOES NOT CONSTITUTE SOLICITATION AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS A COMMITMENT BY THE GOVERNMENT. RESPONSES IN ANY FORM ARE NOT OFFERS AND THE GOVERNMENT IS UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO AWARD A CONTRACT AS A RESULT OF THIS ANNOUNCEMENT. NO FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE TO PAY FOR PREPARATION OF RESPONSES TO THIS ANNOUNCEMENT. ANY INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY RESPONDENTS TO THIS TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION IS STRICTLY VOLUNTARY. THE GOVERNMENT MAY USE THE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM RESPONSES TO THIS NOTICE IN DETERMINING ITS ACQUISITION APPROACH.? THE ISSUANCE OF THIS NOTICE DOES NOT RESTRICT THE GOVERNMENT ACQUISTION APPROACH.? 1.3 REQUIRED CAPABILITIES Interested firms should submit information as to the capabilities, capacity, and experience to provide an MWS as set forth below: The MWS must alert the F-15EX aircrew to the presence of missiles that may threaten the aircraft without unreasonably distracting the aircrew with false alarms. The MWS must use the six (6) pre-existing F-15EX sensor locations, data cables, power cables, and cooling. It must be easily, safely, rapidly, and organically installable and removable in the field by USAF military aircraft maintenance personnel without requiring any change to aircraft configuration beyond installation of MWS line replaceable units (LRUs) in the six (6) pre-existing locations in the aircraft dedicated for missile warning. To avoid compromise of classified information, this notice does not ask for threat missile launch and approach detection performance for various use cases nor for an MWS concept of operations. AFLCMC/WAQ may contact you to ask for detection performance information if your response to this Sources Sought notice indicates your MWS is integrable in an F-15EX aircraft. Questions: What is the name of the MWS you describe in your response to this Sources Sought notice? Please include titles, abbreviations, and nomenclature as available. Please only identify and describe a single MWS in your response. On what Department of War (DoW) aircraft model(s) is your MWS approved for operational use today? Approval for operational use requires both 1) determination of airworthiness of the aircraft with your MWS integrated and 2) sustainment of the aircraft’s cybersecurity Authorization to Operate. Who are the best references (name, position, organization, commercial telephone number, and US Government email address) for DoW acquirers responsible for procuring your MWS for operational use on DoW aircraft named in question 2? Is your MWS in active production today? How many months from contract award could your MWS be delivered? Does your MWS consist only of sensor LRUs or does your MWS consist of sensor LRUs connected to a central processing LRU? If MWS sensors are connected to a central processor, how are they connected? What are the dimensions of each LRU in your MWS? You are alternately welcome to include in your response figures from engineering drawings that identify dimensions, rather than listing dimensions. How much does each LRU in your MWS weigh? How are your MWS’s LRUs physically fastened to an aircraft? What are your MWS’s electrical power requirements? Through what cable connection(s) is your MWS powered by the aircraft? What are your MWS’s cooling requirements? Through what interface(s) is your MWS cooled by the aircraft? Can your MWS be connected to an aircraft’s MIL-STD-1553 avionics bus? What are the terms by which your firm will share the MIL-STD-1553 avionics bus interface specification for your MWS with The Boeing Company so data can be exchanged between your MWS and the F-15EX’s onboard mission computer? Does your MWS require the aircrew or maintenance personnel to provide information to your MWS during aircraft preflight or midflight for it to correctly detect missiles that may threaten the aircraft? If so, how is this information provided to your MWS? Does the installation on, operation of, or removal of your MWS from an aircraft expose personnel to a known health or safety hazard? Are there any known limitations on your MWS’s use in the F-15EX aircraft’s operational environment as verified in accordance with MIL-STD-810H? Does a field-executable procedure exist today for verifying the correct operation of your MWS during aircraft preflight or periodic inspection? If so, please briefly summarize the procedure. Does installation or removal of your MWS require any specific tools that are not commercially available? If yes, please identify the tools and tool vendors. Are there any known limitations on your MWS’ storage environment when MWS LRUs are not installed on an aircraft? What are your plans (if any) for adapting your MWS to meet the architecture and interface requirements of the Agile Mission Suite Government Reference Architecture (https://open-arsenal.gitlab.io/platforms/)? 1.4 NORTH?AMERICAN INDUSTRY?CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM?CODE?(NAICS):? The anticipated NAICS Code is?334511; the corresponding Small Business size?standard in?1350 employes. If the NAICS Code or Small Business size standard appears to be?incorrect,?please suggest an alternative NAICS Code and Small Business size?for consideration.? 1.5? SUBMISSION DETAILS:?? Vendors interested in responding to this announcement should submit an UNCLASSIFIED technical capabilities statement paper via DoD SAFE NO LATER THAN 12 NOVEMBER 2026, 1600, Eastern Time. To request a DoD SAFE link be sent to your email address to upload your technical capabilities statement paper, please email both Contracting Officer Stephannie Siembab at stephannie.siembab@us.af.mil and Morgan Grudich at morgan.grudich@us.af.mil. NO PHONE CALLS WILL BE ACCEPTED. CLASSIFIED information will NOT be accepted. The Government will not reimburse the contractor for any costs associated with preparing or submitting a response to this notice. Responses shall be limited to six (6), 8.5 x 11-inch pages with no smaller than 12-point font. Proprietary information, if any, should be minimized and MUST BE CLEARLY MARKED. To aid the Government, please segregate proprietary information. Please be advised that all submissions become Government property and will not be returned. It is the submitter’s sole responsibility to verify the e-file was received and can be viewed. All information received that is marked Proprietary will be handled accordingly.?Please be advised that all submissions become Government property and will not be returned. All Government and contractor personnel reviewing sources sought responses will have signed non- disclosure agreement and understand their responsibility for proper use and protection from unauthorized disclosure of proprietary information as described in 41 USC 423. The Government shall not be held liable for any damages incurred if proprietary information is not property identified.? 1.6 RESPONSES SHALL INCLUDE: Name of Company, Address, and Point of Contact (Name, Title, Phone, Email) Contractor and Government Entity (CAGE) code Unique Entity ID (UEI) DUNS Number Capabilities statement paper (no more than six (6), 8.5 x 11-inch pages with no smaller than 12-point font) demonstrating ability to perform in accordance with paragraph 1.3 above Firms responding to this announcement should indicate whether they are a large business, small business, small disadvantaged business (SDB), woman-owned small business (WOSB), economically disadvantaged women-owned small business (EDWOSB), 8(a)-certified business, service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB), veteran-owned small business (VOSB), or Historically Underutilized Business Zone small business (HUBZone). 1.7 QUESTIONS: Questions regarding this announcement shall be submitted in writing by email to the Contracting Officer, Stephannie Siembab at stephannie.siembab@us.af.mil. Verbal and phone questions will NOT be accepted. Answers to questions will be posted on SAM.gov website. Questions shall NOT contain proprietary or classified information. 1.8 SUMMARY: THIS IS A SOURCES SOUGHT to identify potential sources that can provide the MWS. The information provided in this announcement is subject to change and is not binding on the Government. The Department of the Air Force has not made a commitment to procure any of the supplies/services discussed and release of this Sources Sought should not be construed as such a commitment or as an authorization to incur cost for which reimbursement would be required or sought. All submissions become Government property and will not be returned.

05 / Historical Spending Trend

How has spending on the selected comparable contracts changed?

The same closed fiscal-year window and the same complete comparable-contract set are used throughout this Brief. Net obligations total $1.01B across 7 fiscal years.

Annual net obligations for the selected comparable contract set for this opportunity, classified under NAICS 334511 and PSC 5865.
Annual FPDS net obligations for the selected comparable contract set; direct and broad matches are identified separately in the table, and this is not total NAICS or PSC market spending.
Fiscal yearComparable obligationsActionsVendors
FY 2019$945.4K11
FY 2020$150.49M43
FY 2021$147.98M144
FY 2022$292.89M335
FY 2023$246.43M284
FY 2024$122.54M344
FY 2025$51.56M616

06 / Related Historical Awards

Which contracts support the comparison?

No direct contract reference was found. 15 broad matches are shown as supporting context.

Selected historical contracts comparable to this opportunity, ranked by absolute net obligations.
Comparable contracts selected using buyer, office, classification and requirement-language evidence; they are not asserted as predecessors.
ContractVendorLatest activityOfficeNAICS / PSCMatchObligationsActions
FA852220F0019L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CINCINNATI ELECTRONICS CORPORATIONNov 13, 2025FA8522 AFSC PZABB334511 / 5865Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$1.05M4
FA852221F0030L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CINCINNATI ELECTRONICS CORPORATIONOct 22, 2025FA8538 AFSC PZAAB334511 / 5865Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$782.7K4
FA852222F0039L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CINCINNATI ELECTRONICS CORPORATIONNov 20, 2025FA8522 AFSC PZABB334511 / J059Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$820.2K3
FA823220F0068EFW INC.May 12, 2025FA8232 AFLCMC WWMK334511 / 1680Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$14.47M9
FA823221F0099EFW INC.May 7, 2025FA8232 AFLCMC WWMK334511 / R425Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$410.6K2
FA852219F0049L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CINCINNATI ELECTRONICS CORPORATIONNov 29, 2023FA8522 AFSC PZABB334511 / J058Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$945.4K3
FA852218F0050L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CINCINNATI ELECTRONICS CORPORATIONJul 21, 2023FA8522 AFSC PZABB334511 / J058Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$02
FA863421C2702BOEING COMPANY, THEDec 22, 2025FA8634 AFLCMC WAQK F15336411 / 5865Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$01
FA863822F0014NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONMay 8, 2023FA8638 AFLCMC HBKD334419 / 5865Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$31.03M4
FA850425CB003HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.Dec 16, 2025FA8504 AFLCMC WLNKA334511 / DH10Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$190.4K2
FA821724F0306LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONSep 23, 2025FA8217 AFLCMC HBDK334511 / R408Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$3.17M5
FA821722F0325LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONJul 16, 2025FA8217 AFLCMC HBDK334511 / R408Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$1.14M6
FA821721F0245LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONJun 18, 2025FA8217 AFLCMC HBDK334511 / R408Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$3.07M5
FA821722F0223LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONMay 8, 2025FA8217 AFLCMC HBDK334511 / R408Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$1.57M5
FA821722F0329LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONMay 8, 2025FA8217 AFLCMC HBDK334511 / R408Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$860.6K6

07 / Contractor Evidence

Which contractors have performed related work?

Historical contractors are ranked by direct procurement-family evidence and comparable contract activity. The table distinguishes connected holders from broader performers without identifying unverified bidders.

No directly connected predecessor was identified. The companies below are historical performers selected from the comparable contract set; none is identified as a bidder.

Suppliers ranked by net obligations within the selected comparable contract set for this opportunity.
Supplier concentration within the comparable contract set only; ranking does not establish incumbency or intent to bid.
CompanyEvidenceFitWhy includedContractsActionsObligationsLatest activityLinks
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION
UEI E4X3BLZPPPX3 · CAGE 26916
Broad historical performer
Historical performer
ModerateComparable buyer and requirement history14$31.03MMay 8, 2023GETWAB profile
Verified via SAM Entities
Official website
EFW INC.
UEI TBLKC12FCDH8 · CAGE 0WEC9
Broad historical performer
Historical performer
ModerateComparable buyer and requirement history211$14.88MMay 12, 2025GETWAB profile
Verified via GSA eLibrary
Official website
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI H11HD5VHGHN3 · CAGE 03538
Broad historical performer
Historical performer
ModerateComparable buyer and requirement history527$9.80MSep 23, 2025GETWAB profile
Verified via SAM Entities
Official website
L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CINCINNATI ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
UEI PBCNEVB6QG19 · CAGE 80045
Broad historical performer
Historical performer
ModerateComparable buyer and requirement history516$3.60MNov 20, 2025GETWAB profile
Verified via SAM Entities
Official website
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
UEI JCCHJ122AVW9 · CAGE 58960
Broad historical performer
Historical performer
ModerateComparable buyer and requirement history12$190.4KDec 16, 2025GETWAB profile
BOEING COMPANY, THE
UEI JJM4FRDZJDX1 · CAGE 76301
Broad historical performer
Historical performer
ModerateComparable buyer and requirement history11$0Dec 22, 2025GETWAB profile
Verified via SAM Entities
Official website

08 / Competitive Landscape

How was comparable work competed?

Competition treatment is calculated from exactly the same closed-period contract set used in Sections 5–7. It describes historical actions, not the outcome of this solicitation.

FPDS extent-of-competition categories recorded on the selected comparable contracts.
Competition treatment recorded only on the comparable contract set; it does not predict the outcome of this solicitation.
FPDS treatmentCodeActionsObligationsShare
Not competedC164$997.96M98.5%
Full and open competitionA11$14.88M1.5%

09 / Procurement History

How was this opportunity published and updated?

One SAM.gov notice record was resolved for this procurement family.

NoticeTypePostedResponse deadlineStatusOfficial source
PCOL-2026-MWS
Current Brief record
F-15EX Missile Warning System
Sources SoughtSep 29, 2026Nov 12, 2026 4:00 PM GMT-0500ActiveView on SAM.gov

10 / NAICS and PSC Market Context

How large is the selected comparable market?

Classification codes organize the evidence; they do not prove that every contract in the broader NAICS or PSC market matches this requirement.

Comparable obligations$1.01B
Comparable contracts15
Historical suppliers6
CoverageFY 2019–FY 2025

11 / Capture Signals and Risks

What should be validated before committing capture resources?

Capture signals separate verified procurement-family evidence from unresolved requirements and market-only indicators.

Watch

Direct procurement-family evidence

No direct award record found

Strong

Buyer proximity

1 comparable record(s) share the contracting office

Moderate

Eligibility

No Set aside used

Watch

Unresolved requirement fields

6

12 / Who Should Pursue

When does this opportunity fit?

Pursue if
  • Your team can demonstrate recent, relevant delivery in F-15EX Missile Warning System.
  • Your company can document the stated eligibility conditions: Responses must include company contact information, CAGE/UEI/DUNS, and a capabilities statement (up to six pages). Respondents should indicate their business size/type (large/small and specified small business categories).
  • You can perform under the stated acquisition model: The notice is a Sources Sought (market research). It is not an RFP, RFQ, or IFB, and it does not constitute a solicitation or commitment by the Government.
  • You can show credible past performance for FA8634 AFLCMC WAQK F15 or a closely related federal customer.
Partner if
  • Your technical scope fits, but you lack demonstrated history with FA8634 AFLCMC WAQK F15.
  • You need a specialist teammate to close unresolved staffing, security, or detailed-scope requirements before committing.
Pass or investigate further if
  • You cannot satisfy or verify the stated eligibility conditions: Responses must include company contact information, CAGE/UEI/DUNS, and a capabilities statement (up to six pages). Respondents should indicate their business size/type (large/small and specified small business categories).
  • Your delivery model cannot support the stated contract vehicle or order-based work structure.
  • The unresolved requirements shown above cannot be validated before committing proposal resources.