01 / Federal Opportunity Brief
F-15EX Missile Warning System
02 / Federal Buyer
Who is buying?
03 / Purchase
What is the government buying?
F-15EX Missile Warning System
The current notice is soliciting this requirement from eligible offerors.
The system must alert F-15EX aircrew to missile threats without unreasonably distracting them with false alarms, and it must be an integrated MWS solution for F-15EX using the pre-existing sensor locations/cabling/cooling. It is intended for rapid integration into the F-15EX fleet.
The notice is a Sources Sought (market research). It is not an RFP, RFQ, or IFB, and it does not constitute a solicitation or commitment by the Government.
The Government seeks an operationally qualified threat missile launch and approach warning system for rapid integration into the F-15EX. The system must use six pre-existing sensor locations, data/power cables, and cooling, and must be easily, safely, rapidly, and organically installable/removable in the field by USAF military aircraft maintenance personnel.
04 / Contracting Requirements
How will this procurement work?
| Requirement | What the notice says | Source status |
|---|---|---|
| Eligibility | Responses must include company contact information, CAGE/UEI/DUNS, and a capabilities statement (up to six pages). Respondents should indicate their business size/type (large/small and specified small business categories). | Confirmed |
| Contract ceiling | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Minimum guarantee | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Contract duration | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Foreign participation | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Proposal and award procedure | The notice provides that it is not an RFP/RFQ/IFB. It does require responses to include certain information (company contact and capabilities statement), and it includes questions respondents should answer. No specific evaluation factors/scoring for award are provided (consistent with this being market research). | Partially Confirmed |
| Staffing and security | No staffing roles/requirements or security clearance requirements are stated in the supplied evidence. | Not Disclosed |
Read the original SAM.gov description
The Department of the Air Force, Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC), Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC), Fighters & Advanced Aircraft Directorate (AFLCMC/WA), F?15 System Program Office (AFLCMC/WAQ), Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (WPAFB) is seeking sources for the procurement of an operationally qualified threat missile launch and approach warning system for rapid integration into the United States Air Force (USAF) F-15EX Eagle II fighter aircraft. INTRODUCTION: This is a SOURCES SOUGHT ANNOUNCEMENT to acquire a missile warning system (MWS) to be integrated into the F-15EX fleet. The system must alert the F-15EX aircrew to missile threats without unreasonably distracting the aircrew with false alarms. The MWS must use the six pre-existing sensor locations, data cables, power cables, and cooling. The MWS must be easily, safely, rapidly, and organically installable and removable in the field by USAF military aircraft maintenance personnel. In accordance with Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulation Overhaul (RFO) Part 10, Market Research, AFLCMC/WAQ is seeking information for potential sources for an integrated MWS solution for the F-15EX. This publication is intended to elicit responses from sources with knowledge, skills, data, equipment, access to appropriate facilities, and the capacity to meet the Air Force’s requirements. The dollar value and period of performance (PoP) for the contract will be commensurate with the requirement. This contract effort is subject to RFO 52.232-18, Availability of Funds. 1.1 SOURCES SOUGHT INFORMATION 1.2 DISCLAIMER: THIS?SOURCES SOUGHT?IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.? THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP), REQUEST FOR QUOTE (RFQ) OR AN INVITATION FOR BID (IFB).?IN ACCORDANCE WITH?RFO 15.101(c),?THIS NOTICE?DOES NOT CONSTITUTE SOLICITATION AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS A COMMITMENT BY THE GOVERNMENT. RESPONSES IN ANY FORM ARE NOT OFFERS AND THE GOVERNMENT IS UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO AWARD A CONTRACT AS A RESULT OF THIS ANNOUNCEMENT. NO FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE TO PAY FOR PREPARATION OF RESPONSES TO THIS ANNOUNCEMENT. ANY INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY RESPONDENTS TO THIS TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION IS STRICTLY VOLUNTARY. THE GOVERNMENT MAY USE THE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM RESPONSES TO THIS NOTICE IN DETERMINING ITS ACQUISITION APPROACH.? THE ISSUANCE OF THIS NOTICE DOES NOT RESTRICT THE GOVERNMENT ACQUISTION APPROACH.? 1.3 REQUIRED CAPABILITIES Interested firms should submit information as to the capabilities, capacity, and experience to provide an MWS as set forth below: The MWS must alert the F-15EX aircrew to the presence of missiles that may threaten the aircraft without unreasonably distracting the aircrew with false alarms. The MWS must use the six (6) pre-existing F-15EX sensor locations, data cables, power cables, and cooling. It must be easily, safely, rapidly, and organically installable and removable in the field by USAF military aircraft maintenance personnel without requiring any change to aircraft configuration beyond installation of MWS line replaceable units (LRUs) in the six (6) pre-existing locations in the aircraft dedicated for missile warning. To avoid compromise of classified information, this notice does not ask for threat missile launch and approach detection performance for various use cases nor for an MWS concept of operations. AFLCMC/WAQ may contact you to ask for detection performance information if your response to this Sources Sought notice indicates your MWS is integrable in an F-15EX aircraft. Questions: What is the name of the MWS you describe in your response to this Sources Sought notice? Please include titles, abbreviations, and nomenclature as available. Please only identify and describe a single MWS in your response. On what Department of War (DoW) aircraft model(s) is your MWS approved for operational use today? Approval for operational use requires both 1) determination of airworthiness of the aircraft with your MWS integrated and 2) sustainment of the aircraft’s cybersecurity Authorization to Operate. Who are the best references (name, position, organization, commercial telephone number, and US Government email address) for DoW acquirers responsible for procuring your MWS for operational use on DoW aircraft named in question 2? Is your MWS in active production today? How many months from contract award could your MWS be delivered? Does your MWS consist only of sensor LRUs or does your MWS consist of sensor LRUs connected to a central processing LRU? If MWS sensors are connected to a central processor, how are they connected? What are the dimensions of each LRU in your MWS? You are alternately welcome to include in your response figures from engineering drawings that identify dimensions, rather than listing dimensions. How much does each LRU in your MWS weigh? How are your MWS’s LRUs physically fastened to an aircraft? What are your MWS’s electrical power requirements? Through what cable connection(s) is your MWS powered by the aircraft? What are your MWS’s cooling requirements? Through what interface(s) is your MWS cooled by the aircraft? Can your MWS be connected to an aircraft’s MIL-STD-1553 avionics bus? What are the terms by which your firm will share the MIL-STD-1553 avionics bus interface specification for your MWS with The Boeing Company so data can be exchanged between your MWS and the F-15EX’s onboard mission computer? Does your MWS require the aircrew or maintenance personnel to provide information to your MWS during aircraft preflight or midflight for it to correctly detect missiles that may threaten the aircraft? If so, how is this information provided to your MWS? Does the installation on, operation of, or removal of your MWS from an aircraft expose personnel to a known health or safety hazard? Are there any known limitations on your MWS’s use in the F-15EX aircraft’s operational environment as verified in accordance with MIL-STD-810H? Does a field-executable procedure exist today for verifying the correct operation of your MWS during aircraft preflight or periodic inspection? If so, please briefly summarize the procedure. Does installation or removal of your MWS require any specific tools that are not commercially available? If yes, please identify the tools and tool vendors. Are there any known limitations on your MWS’ storage environment when MWS LRUs are not installed on an aircraft? What are your plans (if any) for adapting your MWS to meet the architecture and interface requirements of the Agile Mission Suite Government Reference Architecture (https://open-arsenal.gitlab.io/platforms/)? 1.4 NORTH?AMERICAN INDUSTRY?CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM?CODE?(NAICS):? The anticipated NAICS Code is?334511; the corresponding Small Business size?standard in?1350 employes. If the NAICS Code or Small Business size standard appears to be?incorrect,?please suggest an alternative NAICS Code and Small Business size?for consideration.? 1.5? SUBMISSION DETAILS:?? Vendors interested in responding to this announcement should submit an UNCLASSIFIED technical capabilities statement paper via DoD SAFE NO LATER THAN 12 NOVEMBER 2026, 1600, Eastern Time. To request a DoD SAFE link be sent to your email address to upload your technical capabilities statement paper, please email both Contracting Officer Stephannie Siembab at stephannie.siembab@us.af.mil and Morgan Grudich at morgan.grudich@us.af.mil. NO PHONE CALLS WILL BE ACCEPTED. CLASSIFIED information will NOT be accepted. The Government will not reimburse the contractor for any costs associated with preparing or submitting a response to this notice. Responses shall be limited to six (6), 8.5 x 11-inch pages with no smaller than 12-point font. Proprietary information, if any, should be minimized and MUST BE CLEARLY MARKED. To aid the Government, please segregate proprietary information. Please be advised that all submissions become Government property and will not be returned. It is the submitter’s sole responsibility to verify the e-file was received and can be viewed. All information received that is marked Proprietary will be handled accordingly.?Please be advised that all submissions become Government property and will not be returned. All Government and contractor personnel reviewing sources sought responses will have signed non- disclosure agreement and understand their responsibility for proper use and protection from unauthorized disclosure of proprietary information as described in 41 USC 423. The Government shall not be held liable for any damages incurred if proprietary information is not property identified.? 1.6 RESPONSES SHALL INCLUDE: Name of Company, Address, and Point of Contact (Name, Title, Phone, Email) Contractor and Government Entity (CAGE) code Unique Entity ID (UEI) DUNS Number Capabilities statement paper (no more than six (6), 8.5 x 11-inch pages with no smaller than 12-point font) demonstrating ability to perform in accordance with paragraph 1.3 above Firms responding to this announcement should indicate whether they are a large business, small business, small disadvantaged business (SDB), woman-owned small business (WOSB), economically disadvantaged women-owned small business (EDWOSB), 8(a)-certified business, service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB), veteran-owned small business (VOSB), or Historically Underutilized Business Zone small business (HUBZone). 1.7 QUESTIONS: Questions regarding this announcement shall be submitted in writing by email to the Contracting Officer, Stephannie Siembab at stephannie.siembab@us.af.mil. Verbal and phone questions will NOT be accepted. Answers to questions will be posted on SAM.gov website. Questions shall NOT contain proprietary or classified information. 1.8 SUMMARY: THIS IS A SOURCES SOUGHT to identify potential sources that can provide the MWS. The information provided in this announcement is subject to change and is not binding on the Government. The Department of the Air Force has not made a commitment to procure any of the supplies/services discussed and release of this Sources Sought should not be construed as such a commitment or as an authorization to incur cost for which reimbursement would be required or sought. All submissions become Government property and will not be returned.
05 / Historical Spending Trend
How has spending on the selected comparable contracts changed?
The same closed fiscal-year window and the same complete comparable-contract set are used throughout this Brief. Net obligations total $1.01B across 7 fiscal years.

| Fiscal year | Comparable obligations | Actions | Vendors |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2019 | $945.4K | 1 | 1 |
| FY 2020 | $150.49M | 4 | 3 |
| FY 2021 | $147.98M | 14 | 4 |
| FY 2022 | $292.89M | 33 | 5 |
| FY 2023 | $246.43M | 28 | 4 |
| FY 2024 | $122.54M | 34 | 4 |
| FY 2025 | $51.56M | 61 | 6 |
06 / Related Historical Awards
Which contracts support the comparison?
No direct contract reference was found. 15 broad matches are shown as supporting context.

| Contract | Vendor | Latest activity | Office | NAICS / PSC | Match | Obligations | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA852220F0019 | L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CINCINNATI ELECTRONICS CORPORATION | Nov 13, 2025 | FA8522 AFSC PZABB | 334511 / 5865 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $1.05M | 4 |
| FA852221F0030 | L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CINCINNATI ELECTRONICS CORPORATION | Oct 22, 2025 | FA8538 AFSC PZAAB | 334511 / 5865 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $782.7K | 4 |
| FA852222F0039 | L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CINCINNATI ELECTRONICS CORPORATION | Nov 20, 2025 | FA8522 AFSC PZABB | 334511 / J059 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $820.2K | 3 |
| FA823220F0068 | EFW INC. | May 12, 2025 | FA8232 AFLCMC WWMK | 334511 / 1680 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $14.47M | 9 |
| FA823221F0099 | EFW INC. | May 7, 2025 | FA8232 AFLCMC WWMK | 334511 / R425 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $410.6K | 2 |
| FA852219F0049 | L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CINCINNATI ELECTRONICS CORPORATION | Nov 29, 2023 | FA8522 AFSC PZABB | 334511 / J058 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $945.4K | 3 |
| FA852218F0050 | L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CINCINNATI ELECTRONICS CORPORATION | Jul 21, 2023 | FA8522 AFSC PZABB | 334511 / J058 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $0 | 2 |
| FA863421C2702 | BOEING COMPANY, THE | Dec 22, 2025 | FA8634 AFLCMC WAQK F15 | 336411 / 5865 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $0 | 1 |
| FA863822F0014 | NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION | May 8, 2023 | FA8638 AFLCMC HBKD | 334419 / 5865 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $31.03M | 4 |
| FA850425CB003 | HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. | Dec 16, 2025 | FA8504 AFLCMC WLNKA | 334511 / DH10 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $190.4K | 2 |
| FA821724F0306 | LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION | Sep 23, 2025 | FA8217 AFLCMC HBDK | 334511 / R408 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $3.17M | 5 |
| FA821722F0325 | LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION | Jul 16, 2025 | FA8217 AFLCMC HBDK | 334511 / R408 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $1.14M | 6 |
| FA821721F0245 | LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION | Jun 18, 2025 | FA8217 AFLCMC HBDK | 334511 / R408 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $3.07M | 5 |
| FA821722F0223 | LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION | May 8, 2025 | FA8217 AFLCMC HBDK | 334511 / R408 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $1.57M | 5 |
| FA821722F0329 | LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION | May 8, 2025 | FA8217 AFLCMC HBDK | 334511 / R408 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $860.6K | 6 |
07 / Contractor Evidence
Which contractors have performed related work?
Historical contractors are ranked by direct procurement-family evidence and comparable contract activity. The table distinguishes connected holders from broader performers without identifying unverified bidders.
No directly connected predecessor was identified. The companies below are historical performers selected from the comparable contract set; none is identified as a bidder.

| Company | Evidence | Fit | Why included | Contracts | Actions | Obligations | Latest activity | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION UEI E4X3BLZPPPX3 · CAGE 26916 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 4 | $31.03M | May 8, 2023 | GETWAB profile Verified via SAM Entities Official website |
| EFW INC. UEI TBLKC12FCDH8 · CAGE 0WEC9 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 2 | 11 | $14.88M | May 12, 2025 | GETWAB profile Verified via GSA eLibrary Official website |
| LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION UEI H11HD5VHGHN3 · CAGE 03538 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 5 | 27 | $9.80M | Sep 23, 2025 | GETWAB profile Verified via SAM Entities Official website |
| L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CINCINNATI ELECTRONICS CORPORATION UEI PBCNEVB6QG19 · CAGE 80045 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 5 | 16 | $3.60M | Nov 20, 2025 | GETWAB profile Verified via SAM Entities Official website |
| HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. UEI JCCHJ122AVW9 · CAGE 58960 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 2 | $190.4K | Dec 16, 2025 | GETWAB profile |
| BOEING COMPANY, THE UEI JJM4FRDZJDX1 · CAGE 76301 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 1 | $0 | Dec 22, 2025 | GETWAB profile Verified via SAM Entities Official website |
08 / Competitive Landscape
How was comparable work competed?
Competition treatment is calculated from exactly the same closed-period contract set used in Sections 5–7. It describes historical actions, not the outcome of this solicitation.

| FPDS treatment | Code | Actions | Obligations | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not competed | C | 164 | $997.96M | 98.5% |
| Full and open competition | A | 11 | $14.88M | 1.5% |
09 / Procurement History
How was this opportunity published and updated?
One SAM.gov notice record was resolved for this procurement family.
| Notice | Type | Posted | Response deadline | Status | Official source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCOL-2026-MWS Current Brief record F-15EX Missile Warning System | Sources Sought | Sep 29, 2026 | Nov 12, 2026 4:00 PM GMT-0500 | Active | View on SAM.gov |
10 / NAICS and PSC Market Context
How large is the selected comparable market?
Classification codes organize the evidence; they do not prove that every contract in the broader NAICS or PSC market matches this requirement.
11 / Capture Signals and Risks
What should be validated before committing capture resources?
Capture signals separate verified procurement-family evidence from unresolved requirements and market-only indicators.
Direct procurement-family evidence
No direct award record found
Buyer proximity
1 comparable record(s) share the contracting office
Eligibility
No Set aside used
Unresolved requirement fields
6
12 / Who Should Pursue
When does this opportunity fit?
- Your team can demonstrate recent, relevant delivery in F-15EX Missile Warning System.
- Your company can document the stated eligibility conditions: Responses must include company contact information, CAGE/UEI/DUNS, and a capabilities statement (up to six pages). Respondents should indicate their business size/type (large/small and specified small business categories).
- You can perform under the stated acquisition model: The notice is a Sources Sought (market research). It is not an RFP, RFQ, or IFB, and it does not constitute a solicitation or commitment by the Government.
- You can show credible past performance for FA8634 AFLCMC WAQK F15 or a closely related federal customer.
- Your technical scope fits, but you lack demonstrated history with FA8634 AFLCMC WAQK F15.
- You need a specialist teammate to close unresolved staffing, security, or detailed-scope requirements before committing.
- You cannot satisfy or verify the stated eligibility conditions: Responses must include company contact information, CAGE/UEI/DUNS, and a capabilities statement (up to six pages). Respondents should indicate their business size/type (large/small and specified small business categories).
- Your delivery model cannot support the stated contract vehicle or order-based work structure.
- The unresolved requirements shown above cannot be validated before committing proposal resources.



