01 / Federal Opportunity Brief
Ft. Leavenworth Fire Alarm and Mass Notification System Upgrade, $45M, 5 Year SATOC
02 / Federal Buyer
Who is buying?
03 / Purchase
What is the government buying?
Ft. Leavenworth Fire Alarm and Mass Notification System Upgrade, $45M, 5 Year SATOC
The current notice is soliciting this requirement from eligible offerors.
The scope involves upgrading the fire alarm and mass notification system at Ft. Leavenworth, but detailed deliverables are not provided.
The contract will be awarded as a single firm-fixed-price (FFP) single award task order contract (SATOC).
Work will be assigned through task orders issued by the contracting officer under the SATOC.
04 / Contracting Requirements
How will this procurement work?
| Requirement | What the notice says | Source status |
|---|---|---|
| Eligibility | This project is 100% set-aside for 8(a) small business concerns. | Confirmed |
| Contract ceiling | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Minimum guarantee | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Contract duration | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Foreign participation | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Proposal and award procedure | The notice states this is a Request for Proposal (RFP) but does not provide detailed evaluation factors or submission instructions. | Partially Confirmed |
| Staffing and security | Staffing and security clearance requirements are not disclosed. | Not Disclosed |
Read the original SAM.gov description
PROJECT TITLE LVN FIRE ALARM AND MASS NOTIFICATION SYSTEM UPGRADEPROJECT LOCATION: FT. LEAVENWORTHTHIS IS A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) WHICH WILL RESULT IN THE AWARD OF A SIGLE FIRM-FIXED-PRICE (FFP) SINGLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT (SATOC)THE PROJECT IS 100% SET-ASIDE FOR 8(A) SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNSTHE NORTH AMERICAN INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION (NAICS) CODE IS 238210 - ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS AND OTHER WIRING INSTALLATION CONTRACTORSTHE SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD IS $19,000,000.THE SATOC CEILING IS $45,000,000
05 / Historical Spending Trend
How has spending on the selected comparable contracts changed?
The same closed fiscal-year window and the same complete comparable-contract set are used throughout this Brief. Net obligations total $767.2K across 3 fiscal years.
| Fiscal year | Comparable obligations | Actions | Vendors |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2020 | $515.3K | 2 | 1 |
| FY 2021 | $94.7K | 1 | 1 |
| FY 2025 | $157.2K | 1 | 1 |
06 / Related Historical Awards
Which contracts support the comparison?
No direct contract reference was found. 1 broad match is shown as supporting context.
| Contract | Vendor | Latest activity | Office | NAICS / PSC | Match | Obligations | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W912BU21C0008 | PUYENPA SERVICES, LLC | Mar 12, 2025 | W2SD ENDIST PHILADELPHIA | 238210 / Y1FZ | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $767.2K | 4 |
07 / Contractor Evidence
Which contractors have performed related work?
Historical contractors are ranked by direct procurement-family evidence and comparable contract activity. The table distinguishes connected holders from broader performers without identifying unverified bidders.
No directly connected predecessor was identified. The companies below are historical performers selected from the comparable contract set; none is identified as a bidder.
| Company | Evidence | Fit | Why included | Contracts | Actions | Obligations | Latest activity | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PUYENPA SERVICES, LLC UEI ZCWUG5M95NL6 · CAGE 7G8Z7 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 4 | $767.2K | Mar 12, 2025 | GETWAB profile Verified via GSA eLibrary Official website |
08 / Competitive Landscape
How was comparable work competed?
Competition treatment is calculated from exactly the same closed-period contract set used in Sections 5–7. It describes historical actions, not the outcome of this solicitation.
| FPDS treatment | Code | Actions | Obligations | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not competed | C | 4 | $767.2K | 100.0% |
09 / Procurement History
How was this opportunity published and updated?
2 SAM.gov notice records were resolved into this procurement family. The chronology shows how the requirement was published and updated.
| Notice | Type | Posted | Response deadline | Status | Official source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W912DQ26RA102 Ft. Leavenworth Fire Alarm and Mass Notification System Upgrade, $45M, 5 Year SATOC | Solicitation | Aug 14, 2026 | Sep 15, 2026 12:00 PM GMT-0500 | Active | View on SAM.gov |
| W912DQ26RA102 Current Brief record Ft. Leavenworth Fire Alarm and Mass Notification System Upgrade, $45M, 5 Year SATOC | Solicitation | Sep 8, 2026 | Oct 1, 2026 11:00 AM GMT-0500 | Active | View on SAM.gov |
10 / NAICS and PSC Market Context
How large is the selected comparable market?
Classification codes organize the evidence; they do not prove that every contract in the broader NAICS or PSC market matches this requirement.
11 / Capture Signals and Risks
What should be validated before committing capture resources?
Capture signals separate verified procurement-family evidence from unresolved requirements and market-only indicators.
Direct procurement-family evidence
No direct award record found
Buyer proximity
No same-office comparable identified
Eligibility
8(a) Set-Aside (FAR 19.8)
Unresolved requirement fields
6
12 / Who Should Pursue
When does this opportunity fit?
- Your team can demonstrate recent, relevant delivery in fire alarm and mass notification system upgrade.
- Your company can document the stated eligibility conditions: This project is 100% set-aside for 8(a) small business concerns.
- You can perform under the stated acquisition model: The contract will be awarded as a single firm-fixed-price (FFP) single award task order contract (SATOC).
- You can show credible past performance for W071 ENDIST KANSAS CITY or a closely related federal customer.
- Your technical scope fits, but you lack demonstrated history with W071 ENDIST KANSAS CITY.
- You need a specialist teammate to close unresolved staffing, security, or detailed-scope requirements before committing.
- You cannot satisfy or verify the stated eligibility conditions: This project is 100% set-aside for 8(a) small business concerns.
- Your delivery model cannot support the stated contract vehicle or order-based work structure.
- The unresolved requirements shown above cannot be validated before committing proposal resources.