01 / Federal Opportunity Brief
TRAINING INSTRUCTOR OPERATOR SERVICES SUPPORT II
02 / Federal Buyer
Who is buying?
03 / Purchase
What is the government buying?
TRAINING INSTRUCTOR OPERATOR SERVICES SUPPORT II
The current notice is soliciting this requirement from eligible offerors.
The requirement is for continuous, uninterrupted instructor/operator (I/O) support for the MSTCs, plus support for other miscellaneous courses and training events at Army MSTCs throughout CONUS and OCONUS. The notice indicates detailed performance/work instructions are in the attached solicitation.
This notice anticipates a single-award contract that uses a Firm-Fixed Price structure with a Mandatory Minimum Staffing Baseline (MMSB).
The notice does not state how individual work is ordered/assigned during the base and option periods; it only says the solicitation details are in the attached solicitation.
04 / Contracting Requirements
How will this procurement work?
| Requirement | What the notice says | Source status |
|---|---|---|
| Eligibility | The notice states it is a Total Small Business Set-Aside, but it does not provide any additional qualification requirements in the supplied text. | Partially Confirmed |
| Contract ceiling | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Minimum guarantee | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Contract duration | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Foreign participation | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Proposal and award procedure | The notice provides a proposal due date/time and a question due date/time, and it states that late submissions will not be considered for evaluation. However, it does not provide the detailed evaluation factors/scoring or detailed submission instructions (it points to the attached solicitation). | Partially Confirmed |
| Staffing and security | The notice references a Mandatory Minimum Staffing Baseline (MMSB), but it does not provide staffing roles/levels or any security/clearance requirements in the supplied text. | Partially Confirmed |
Read the original SAM.gov description
The U.S. Army Contracting Command (ACC-APG) Orlando Contracting Division (OCD), on behalf of the Capability Program Executive Office Simulation, Training, Test & Threat (CPE ST3), is officially announcing the soliciting proposals for the TRAINING INSTRUCTOR OPERATOR SERVICES SUPPORT II (TRIOSS II). This requirement is to procure continuous, uninterrupted I/O support for the MSTCs as well as support for other miscellaneous courses and training events located at Army MSTCs throughout the CONUS and OCONUS. The anticipated contract is for a single award Firm Fixed Price Mandatory Minimum Staffing Baseline (MMSB) contract which has a base period and four 1-year option periods. Detailed instructions, performance work statements, and submission guidelines are fully detailed within the attached solicitation W900KK-27-R-A003. Proposals are due 09 November 2026 at 09:00 EDT. Late submissions will not be considered for evaluation. All questions must be received no later than 15 October 2026 at 11:00 AM Eastern Standard Time (EST), see Section L for submission instructions. Notice of Intent (Requested): To assist the Government in administrative preparations and oral presentation scheduling, all interested Prime Contractors intending to submit a proposal are requested to notify the Government via email at usarmy.orlando.cpe-st3.mbx.trioss-ii@army.mil within one (1) week of this posting. Note: This notification is voluntary and does not preclude the evaluation of any timely received proposal. Oral Presentations: Will be scheduled for in-person presentations at ACC-APG Orlando Contracting Division in Orlando, Florida and will be coordinated with Offerors after all proposals have been received, logged and reviewed to be compliant.
05 / Historical Spending Trend
How has spending on the selected comparable contracts changed?
The same closed fiscal-year window and the same complete comparable-contract set are used throughout this Brief. Net obligations total $3.93B across 7 fiscal years.
| Fiscal year | Comparable obligations | Actions | Vendors |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2019 | $1.45B | 3,007 | 906 |
| FY 2020 | $1.01B | 2,106 | 632 |
| FY 2021 | $611.08M | 1,352 | 380 |
| FY 2022 | $322.03M | 1,022 | 321 |
| FY 2023 | $254.66M | 633 | 162 |
| FY 2024 | $174.15M | 414 | 122 |
| FY 2025 | $116.97M | 326 | 107 |
06 / Related Historical Awards
Which contracts support the comparison?
No direct contract reference was found. 4 broad matches are shown as supporting context.
| Contract | Vendor | Latest activity | Office | NAICS / PSC | Match | Obligations | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0001 | PHOENIX LOGISTICS, INC. | Aug 23, 2022 | W6QK ACC-ORLANDO | 541990 / U009 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $7.13M | 3 |
| W900KK25FA045 | F3EA, INC | Mar 12, 2025 | W6QK ACC-APG-ORLANDO | 541330 / R425 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $838.2K | 1 |
| W9124N20F0006 | JEROME TRANSLATION GROUP, INC. | Feb 27, 2020 | W6QM MICC-PRESIDIO (RC-W) | 541930 / U009 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $25.9K | 1 |
| W91QF518F0154 | FITT SCIENTIFIC, LLC | Mar 5, 2020 | W6QM MICC FT LEE | 541990 / U008 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | -$57.9K | 2 |
07 / Contractor Evidence
Which contractors have performed related work?
Historical contractors are ranked by direct procurement-family evidence and comparable contract activity. The table distinguishes connected holders from broader performers without identifying unverified bidders.
No directly connected predecessor was identified. The companies below are historical performers selected from the comparable contract set; none is identified as a bidder.
| Company | Evidence | Fit | Why included | Contracts | Actions | Obligations | Latest activity | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHOENIX LOGISTICS, INC. UEI EELNFQLNS977 · CAGE 0SCJ7 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 3 | $7.13M | Aug 23, 2022 | GETWAB profile Verified via SAM Entities Official website |
| F3EA, INC UEI Q9XKWDCMEJZ9 · CAGE 72D50 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 1 | $838.2K | Mar 12, 2025 | GETWAB profile Verified via SAM Entities Official website |
| FITT SCIENTIFIC, LLC UEI MLZ8U223ZMV7 · CAGE 71FE7 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 2 | -$57.9K | Mar 5, 2020 | GETWAB profile Verified via SAM Entities Official website |
| JEROME TRANSLATION GROUP, INC. UEI LVSJV3MZHTQ8 · CAGE 1CZB0 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 1 | $25.9K | Feb 27, 2020 | GETWAB profile Verified via SAM Entities Official website |
08 / Competitive Landscape
How was comparable work competed?
Competition treatment is calculated from exactly the same closed-period contract set used in Sections 5–7. It describes historical actions, not the outcome of this solicitation.
| FPDS treatment | Code | Actions | Obligations | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full and open competition | A | 4,874 | $3.02B | 76.8% |
| Full and open after exclusion of sources | D | 2,086 | $508.84M | 12.9% |
| Not competed | C | 1,090 | $383.70M | 9.8% |
| Not available for competition | B | 321 | $14.91M | 0.4% |
| Competed under simplified acquisition procedures | F | 429 | $3.53M | 0.1% |
| Not competed under simplified acquisition procedures | G | 60 | $199.3K | 0.0% |
09 / Procurement History
How was this opportunity published and updated?
One SAM.gov notice record was resolved for this procurement family.
| Notice | Type | Posted | Response deadline | Status | Official source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W900KK-27-R-A0003 Current Brief record TRAINING INSTRUCTOR OPERATOR SERVICES SUPPORT II | Combined Synopsis/Solicitation | Oct 9, 2026 | Nov 9, 2026 9:00 AM GMT-0500 | Active | View on SAM.gov |
10 / NAICS and PSC Market Context
How large is the selected comparable market?
Classification codes organize the evidence; they do not prove that every contract in the broader NAICS or PSC market matches this requirement.
11 / Capture Signals and Risks
What should be validated before committing capture resources?
Capture signals separate verified procurement-family evidence from unresolved requirements and market-only indicators.
Direct procurement-family evidence
No direct award record found
Buyer proximity
2 comparable record(s) share the contracting office
Eligibility
Small Business Set Aside - Total
Unresolved requirement fields
7
12 / Who Should Pursue
When does this opportunity fit?
- Your team can demonstrate recent, relevant delivery in TRAINING INSTRUCTOR OPERATOR SERVICES SUPPORT II.
- Your company can document the stated eligibility conditions: The notice states it is a Total Small Business Set-Aside, but it does not provide any additional qualification requirements in the supplied text.
- You can perform under the stated acquisition model: This notice anticipates a single-award contract that uses a Firm-Fixed Price structure with a Mandatory Minimum Staffing Baseline (MMSB).
- You can show credible past performance for W6QK ACC-APG-ORLANDO or a closely related federal customer.
- Your technical scope fits, but you lack demonstrated history with W6QK ACC-APG-ORLANDO.
- You need a specialist teammate to close unresolved staffing, security, or detailed-scope requirements before committing.
- You cannot satisfy or verify the stated eligibility conditions: The notice states it is a Total Small Business Set-Aside, but it does not provide any additional qualification requirements in the supplied text.
- Your delivery model cannot support the stated contract vehicle or order-based work structure.
- The unresolved requirements shown above cannot be validated before committing proposal resources.