01 / Federal Opportunity Brief
VALVE,REGULATING,FL
02 / Federal Buyer
Who is buying?
03 / Purchase
What is the government buying?
VALVE,REGULATING,FL
The current notice is soliciting this requirement from eligible offerors.
The notice states the contract/purchase order contains requirements for manufacture and contract quality requirements for the specified item (VALVE,REGULATING,FL). However, the evidence does not include the actual technical requirements, quantity, or deliverable list.
The notice indicates a fixed-price (FFP) requirement and that contractual documents such as contracts and purchase/task/delivery orders are treated as “issued” by the government through specified delivery methods, but it does not describe the overall contracting structure beyond that.
The notice indicates that work will be handled through “issued” contractual documents including purchase orders and task/delivery orders, but it does not state how assignments will be structured for this specific VALVE,REGULATING,FL procurement (e.g., whether this is a blanket/order-based arrangement or single award with a single PO).
04 / Contracting Requirements
How will this procurement work?
| Requirement | What the notice says | Source status |
|---|---|---|
| Eligibility | A small business subcontracting plan (basic) is referenced, which suggests subcontracting-plan compliance may be required for eligible offerors/contractors, but the notice evidence does not say who must submit it or when. | Partially Confirmed |
| Contract ceiling | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Minimum guarantee | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Contract duration | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Foreign participation | Not disclosed | Not Disclosed |
| Proposal and award procedure | The evidence includes submission-related process requirements (e.g., electronic submittal of an Invoice and Receiving Report combo through PIEE-WAWF for any order resulting from the RFQ) and references that the government’s acceptance of the contractor’s proposal constitutes bilateral agreement to issue documents. However, it does not provide detailed proposal instructions, evaluation factors, or scoring. | Partially Confirmed |
| Staffing and security | A security prohibitions and exclusions clause is referenced, but the evidence does not provide details about specific security clearances, personnel vetting, or access controls. | Partially Confirmed |
Read the original SAM.gov description
ITEM UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AND VALUATION (JAN 2023)|19|||||||||||||||||||| HIGHER-LEVEL CONTRACT QUALITY REQUIREMENT (DEC 2014)|1|ISO9001| INSPECTION OF SUPPLIES--FIXED-PRICE (AUG 1996)|2||| INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE - SHORT VERSION|8|X||X|||||| STOP-WORK ORDER (AUG 1989)|1|| WIDE AREA WORKFLOW PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS (JAN 2023)|16|INVOICE AND RECEIVING REPORT COMBO||TBD|SPRMM1|TBD|TBD|TBD|TBD|||TBD|||||BRIANNE.CRACKER@DLA.MIL| INTEGRITY OF UNIT PRICES (NOV 2021)|1|| EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR WORKERS WITH DISABILITIES (DEV 2026-O0040)(FEB 2026)|4||||| SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (DOD CONTRACTS)-BASIC (DEV 2026-O0037)(FEB 2026))|2||| CONTRACTOR PURCHASING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION-BASIC (DEVIATION 2026-O0015)|1|| SECURITY PROHIBITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS (CLASS DEVIATION 2026-O0025)(FEB 2026)|7|||||||| LIST OF AWARD ATTACHMENTS|5|||||| ALTERNATE A, ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (DEVIATION 2026-O0043)(FEB 2026))|13|||||||||||||| TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)|1|FFP| NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY PERPARDENESS, AND ENRGY PROGAM USE (APRIL 2008))|2||| THIS AMENDMENT IS BEING EXECUTED TO EXTEND THE END DATE TO DECEMBER 15, 2026. FAR 52.222-90, Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors (DEVIATION 2026-O0040, REVISION 1)(APR 2026) is hereby added to this solicitation. All other terms and conditions remain intact. \ This solicitation is being issued under SEPA-EAF Authority. This procurement requires Higher Level Inspection. 1. All contractual documents (i.e. contracts, purchase orders, task orders, Delivery orders, and modifications) related to the instant procurement are considered to be "issued" by the government when copies are either deposited in the mail, transmitted by facsimile, or sent by other electronic commerce methods, such as email. The government's acceptance of the contractor's proposal constitutes bilateral agreement to "issue" contractual documents as detailed herein. 2. Drawings or technical data are not available for this item. 3. Delivery days_________aro. 4. Offer valid for _____ days. 5. When submitting quotes via EDI, make sure you specify any exceptions (i.e. Mil specs/standards, packaging, I&A, packaging houses etc) or follow up with a hardcopy of the exceptions. If nothing is indicated or received, award will be based upon solicitation requirements. Changes or requests for changes after award will have consideration costs deducted on modifications. 6. If you are not the manufacturer of the material you are offering, you must state who the OEM is (cage code) and the part number you are offering. 7. Please provide an email address for follow up communications. ____________________________________________________________ 8. It is recommended that vendors provide contact information to NAVSUP WSS Mechanicsburg in order to receive automated notifications from Navy Electronic Commerce Online (NECO) when contracts/modifications are issued by DLA Weapons Support Mechanicsburg and posted on EDA. To receive these notifications, contact: NAVSUPWSS code 025, procurement systems design and contract support division Via email at NAVSUPWSSITIMPHelpdesk@navy.mil. Please include the following information with your request: CAGE code, company name, address and POC with phone number and email address. 9. Contractors can view their orders, contracts and modifications at the Electronic Document Access (EDA) web tool. This web tool is located at the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) website. It is recommended that the contractor register for EDA at https://piee.eb.mil/. Click on new user and registration. Any order resulting from this Request for Quotation will require electronic submittal of Invoice and Receiving Report (COMBO) through PIEE-WAWF. 10. The following DLA Procurement Notes are applicable to this requirement: E06 Inspection and Acceptance at Source (JUN 2018) 11. INSPECTION OF MATERIAL WILL BE AT (CAGE & ADDRESS): ______________________________________________________________ INSPECTION OF PACKAGING AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF MATERIAL WILL BE AT (CAGE & ADDRESS): ______________________________________________________________ 12. UCF SECTION F PRODUCTION FACILITY CHANGES (a) The performance of any of the work contracted for in any place other than that named in the contract is prohibited unless specifically approved by the Contracting Officer. Written requests for a change in production facilities must be submitted in writing to the Contracting Officer. Changes in production facilities may be approved, provided: (1) Performance by small business or in labor surplus areas as required by the contract will not be changed; (2) The change will not cause a delay in delivery or necessitate a change in the purchase description; (3) The free on board (f.o.b .) point is not changed; and (4) Each request is supported by a price reduction of $250.00 to cover the Government's administrative costs to process the change. (b) The Government reserves the right to deny approval even if these four elements are met. \ 1. SCOPE 1.1 This contract/purchase order contains the requirements for manufacture and the contract quality requirements for the VALVE,REGULATING,FL . 2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS 2.1 Applicable Documents - The document(s) listed below form a part of this contract/purchase order including modifications or exclusions. 2.1.1 "Document References" listed below must be obtained by the Contractor. Ordering information is included as an attachment to this contract/purchase order. 2.2 Order of Precedence - In the event of a conflict between the text of this contract/purchase order and the references and/or drawings cited herein, the text of this contract/purchase order shall take precedence. Nothing in this contract/purchase order, however, shall supersede applicable laws and regulations unless a specific exemption has been obtained. DOCUMENT REF DATA=MIL-STD-129 | | |P |041029|A| |03| DOCUMENT REF DATA=ISO9001 | | | |010417|A| | | 3. REQUIREMENTS 3.1 Cage Code/Reference Number Items - The VALVE,REGULATING,FL furnished under this contract/purchase order shall be the design represented by Cage Code(s) reference number(s). Cage _______ ref. no. ;7Y333 7378E65-159; 3.2 Marking - This item shall be physically identified in accordance with ;MIL-STD-129; . 3.3 Changes in Design, Material Servicing, or Part Number - Except for a Code 1 change, which shall be processed as provided in the code statement shown below, no substitution of items shall be made until the SPCC Contracting Officer has been notified and approval has been given by issuance of a written change order. When any change in design, material, servicing or part number is made to replace or substitute any item to be furnished on this contract/purchase order, the Contractor shall furnish, for the substituting/replacement item, a drawing and an explanation of the reason for the change, or a detailed description of the change, explaining the reason therefore. If finished detail drawings are not available, shop drawings inthe form used by the manufacturer will be acceptable for Government evaluation. When notifying the Contracting Officer of the reasons for making substitutions, the type of change shall be indicated by code number in accordance with one of the following statements: Code 1: PART NUMBER CHANGE/MINOR DESIGN CHANGE - If the Manufacturer's Part Number or item design indicated thereon has changed, but form, fit and function of the item is not affected thereby, and the design change meets the criteria for minor, by not effecting form, fit, function, reliability or safety , supply the item and advise SPCC immediately of the new part number, furnishing a detail drawing and/or a detailed description of the change, as applicable. Code 2: Assembly (or set or kit) not furnished - Used following detail parts. Code 3: Part not furnished separately - Use assembly. Code 4: Part redesigned - Old and new parts are completely interchangeable. Code 5: Part redesigned - New part replaces old. Old part cannot replace new. Code 6: Part redesigned - Parts not interchangeable. 3.4 Mercury Free - The material supplied under this contract/purchase order is intended for use on submarines/surface ships and therefore shall contain no metallic mercury and shall be free from mercury contamination. Mercury contamination of the material will be cause for rejection. If the inclusion of metallic mercury is required as a functional part of the material furnished under this contract, the Contractor shall obtain written approval from the Procurement Contracting Officer before proceeding with manufacture. The contractor's request shall explain in detail the requirements for mercury, identify specifically the parts to contain mercury, and explain the method of protection against mercury escape. Such a request will be forwarded directly to the Procurement Contracting Officer with a copy to the applicable Government Inspector. Upon approval by the Contracting Officer, the vendor will provide a "Warning Plate" stating that metallic mercury is a functional part of the item and will include name and location of that part. The use of mercury, mercury compounds, or mercury-bearing instruments and/or equipment in a manner which might cause contamination in the manufacture, assembly, or test of material on this contract is prohibited. The most probable causes of contamination are direct-connected manometers, mercury vacuum pumps, mercury seals, or the handling of mercury in the immediate vicinity. Mercury switches, mercury in glass thermometers, standard cells and other items containing mercury may be used if they are located so as not to constitute a contamination hazard. If external contamination by metallic mercury occurs or is suspected, the following test may be used to determine whether contamination by metallic mercury exists or whether corrective cleaning measures have been effective. Enclose the equipment in a polyethylene bag or close-fitting airtight container for eight hours at room temperature (70 degrees F minimum).Sample the trapped air and if mercury vapor concentration is 0.01 mg/cu meter or more, the material is mercury contaminated insofar as the requirements of this contract are concerned. These requirements shall be included in any subcontract or purchase order hereunder and the Contractor shall insure SubContractor compliance with these requirements. Technical questions pertaining to these requirements shall be referred to the Procurement Contracting Officer via the cognizant Administrative Contracting Officer. For background, the following information is provided: Mercury is corrosive to gold, silver, nickel, stainless steels, aluminum and copper alloys. Stainless steels, nickel, and copper alloys are widely used in reactor plants and other submarine/surface ship systems. Accidental trapping of mercury in a component could cause serious damage to vital parts. Mercury is also toxic if inhaled, ingested, or absorbed through the skin. It is evident that grave consequences could result from small amounts of mercury vapor present in an unreplenished submarine/surface ship atmosphere. 4. QUALITY ASSURANCE 4.1 Responsibility for Inspection - Unless otherwise specified in the contract/purchase order, the Contractor is responsible for the performance of all inspection requirements as specified herein. Except as otherwise specified in the contract/purchase order, the Contractor may use his own or any other facilities suitable for the performance of the inspection requirements specified herein, unless disapproved by the Government. The Government reserves the right to perform any of the inspections set forth in the specification where such inspections are deemed necessary to assure supplies and services conform to prescribed requirements. 4.2 Quality System Requirements - The supplier shall provide and maintain a quality system acceptable to the Government. The quality system requirements shall
05 / Historical Spending Trend
How has spending on the selected comparable contracts changed?
The same closed fiscal-year window and the same complete comparable-contract set are used throughout this Brief. Net obligations total $98.6K across 3 fiscal years.

| Fiscal year | Comparable obligations | Actions | Vendors |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2023 | $0 | 1 | 1 |
| FY 2024 | $9.4K | 1 | 1 |
| FY 2025 | $89.2K | 3 | 1 |
06 / Related Historical Awards
Which contracts support the comparison?
No direct contract reference was found. 3 broad matches are shown as supporting context.

| Contract | Vendor | Latest activity | Office | NAICS / PSC | Match | Obligations | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPRMM117CPA49 | VACCO INDUSTRIES | Aug 1, 2023 | SPRMM1 DLA MECHANICSBURG | 332919 / 4820 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $0 | 1 |
| SPRDL125P0026 | HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. | Jun 9, 2025 | DLA LAND WARREN | 332911 / 4820 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $89.2K | 1 |
| SPE7L524P0359 | OSHKOSH DEFENSE LLC | Feb 6, 2024 | DLA LAND AND MARITIME | 332911 / 4820 | Broad match Buyer and requirement-language evidence | $9.4K | 1 |
07 / Contractor Evidence
Which contractors have performed related work?
Historical contractors are ranked by direct procurement-family evidence and comparable contract activity. The table distinguishes connected holders from broader performers without identifying unverified bidders.
No directly connected predecessor was identified. The companies below are historical performers selected from the comparable contract set; none is identified as a bidder.

| Company | Evidence | Fit | Why included | Contracts | Actions | Obligations | Latest activity | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. UEI CVT6PBG5LC18 · CAGE 59364 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 1 | $89.2K | Jun 9, 2025 | GETWAB profile |
| OSHKOSH DEFENSE LLC UEI ZMXAHH8M8VL8 · CAGE 75Q65 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 1 | $9.4K | Feb 6, 2024 | GETWAB profile |
| VACCO INDUSTRIES UEI SX6BF52K2WB1 · CAGE 99517 | Broad historical performer Historical performer | Moderate | Comparable buyer and requirement history | 1 | 1 | $0 | Aug 1, 2023 | GETWAB profile Verified via SAM Entities Official website |
08 / Competitive Landscape
How was comparable work competed?
Competition treatment is calculated from exactly the same closed-period contract set used in Sections 5–7. It describes historical actions, not the outcome of this solicitation.

| FPDS treatment | Code | Actions | Obligations | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not competed | C | 4 | $89.2K | 90.4% |
| Competed under simplified acquisition procedures | F | 1 | $9.4K | 9.6% |
09 / Procurement History
How was this opportunity published and updated?
6 SAM.gov notice records were resolved into this procurement family. The chronology shows how the requirement was published and updated.
| Notice | Type | Posted | Response deadline | Status | Official source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPRMM126RGB33 VALVE,REGULATING,FL | Solicitation | Mar 6, 2026 | Apr 6, 2026 2:00 PM GMT-0400 | Active | View on SAM.gov |
| SPRMM126RGB33 VALVE,REGULATING,FL | Solicitation | Jun 25, 2026 | Jul 9, 2026 2:00 PM GMT-0400 | Active | View on SAM.gov |
| SPRMM126RGB33 VALVE,REGULATING,FL | Solicitation | Jun 25, 2026 | Jul 9, 2026 2:00 PM GMT-0400 | Active | View on SAM.gov |
| SPRMM126RGB33 VALVE,REGULATING,FL | Solicitation | Jul 14, 2026 | Jul 15, 2026 2:00 PM GMT-0400 | Active | View on SAM.gov |
| SPRMM126RGB33 VALVE,REGULATING,FL | Solicitation | Nov 6, 2026 | Dec 15, 2026 2:00 PM GMT-0400 | Active | View on SAM.gov |
| SPRMM126RGB33 Current Brief record VALVE,REGULATING,FL | Solicitation | Nov 6, 2026 | Dec 15, 2026 2:00 PM GMT-0400 | Active | View on SAM.gov |
10 / NAICS and PSC Market Context
How large is the selected comparable market?
Classification codes organize the evidence; they do not prove that every contract in the broader NAICS or PSC market matches this requirement.
11 / Capture Signals and Risks
What should be validated before committing capture resources?
Capture signals separate verified procurement-family evidence from unresolved requirements and market-only indicators.
Direct procurement-family evidence
No direct award record found
Buyer proximity
1 comparable record(s) share the contracting office
Eligibility
Not disclosed in the indexed notice
Unresolved requirement fields
7
12 / Who Should Pursue
When does this opportunity fit?
- Your team can demonstrate recent, relevant delivery in VALVE,REGULATING,FL.
- Your company can document the stated eligibility conditions: A small business subcontracting plan (basic) is referenced, which suggests subcontracting-plan compliance may be required for eligible offerors/contractors, but the notice evidence does not say who must submit it or when.
- You can perform under the stated acquisition model: The notice indicates a fixed-price (FFP) requirement and that contractual documents such as contracts and purchase/task/delivery orders are treated as “issued” by the government through specified delivery methods, but it does not describe t
- You can show credible past performance for SPRMM1 DLA MECHANICSBURG or a closely related federal customer.
- Your technical scope fits, but you lack demonstrated history with SPRMM1 DLA MECHANICSBURG.
- You need a specialist teammate to close unresolved staffing, security, or detailed-scope requirements before committing.
- You cannot satisfy or verify the stated eligibility conditions: A small business subcontracting plan (basic) is referenced, which suggests subcontracting-plan compliance may be required for eligible offerors/contractors, but the notice evidence does not say who must submit it or when.
- Your delivery model cannot support the stated contract vehicle or order-based work structure.
- The unresolved requirements shown above cannot be validated before committing proposal resources.



