01 / Contract Profile
W9124J22F0033 Federal Contract Award
Agency code 2100
ULO FUNDS.
02 / Contract Size and Status
What is the recorded size and timing of this contract?
03 / Spending Trend
W9124J22F0033 contract spending by fiscal year
Annual net obligations across the complete period available for this agency and PIID, from the first recorded fiscal year through the latest contract action.
Latest fiscal year obligations$2.16M
FY 2023Net obligationsComplete recorded range
| Fiscal year | Net obligations | Actions | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2022 | $17.59M | 9 | — |
| FY 2023 | $2.16M | 3 | −87.7% |
04 / Federal Buyer
Which organization manages this contract?
| Department | Contracting agency | Contracting office |
|---|---|---|
| DEPT OF DEFENSE | DEPT OF THE ARMY | W6QM MICC FT LEE |
05 / Contractor
Who holds this federal contract?
MITCHCO INTERNATIONAL, INC.
UEI ZUA6ASFDNCN9 · CAGE 0D6X1
06 / NAICS Industries
Which industries classify this contract?
| Code | Description | Obligations | Actions | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 722310 | FOOD SERVICE CONTRACTORS | $19.75M | 12 | 100.0% |
07 / Products and Services
What products or services were purchased?
| Code | Description | Obligations | Actions | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1FD | OPERATION OF DINING FACILITIES | $19.75M | 12 | 100.0% |
08 / Place of Performance
Where is the work recorded?
FORT LEE, PRINCE GEORGE, VIRGINIA, UNITED STATES
ZIP 238011505
09 / Contract Actions
What modifications and obligations were recorded?
| Signed date | Modification | Obligation | Contracting office | NAICS | PSC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2023 | P00011 | -$1.03M | W6QM MICC FT LEEOffice code W91QF5 | 722310 | M1FD |
| Mar 1, 2023 | P00010 | $1.59M | W6QM MICC FT LEEOffice code W91QF5 | 722310 | M1FD |
| Jan 19, 2023 | P00009 | $1.59M | W6QM MICC FT LEEOffice code W91QF5 | 722310 | M1FD |
| Nov 23, 2022 | P00008 | $2.36M | W6QM MICC FT LEEOffice code W91QF5 | 722310 | M1FD |
| Sep 21, 2022 | P00007 | $203.0K | W6QM MICC FT LEEOffice code W91QF5 | 722310 | M1FD |
| Jul 1, 2022 | P00006 | $5.28M | W6QM MICC FT LEEOffice code W91QF5 | 722310 | M1FD |
| Jun 1, 2022 | P00005 | $1.76M | W6QM MICC FT LEEOffice code W91QF5 | 722310 | M1FD |
| May 5, 2022 | P00004 | $3.98M | W6QM MICC FT LEEOffice code W91QF5 | 722310 | M1FD |
| Apr 12, 2022 | P00003 | $2.03M | W6QM MICC-FDO FT SAM HOUSTONOffice code W9124J | 722310 | M1FD |
| Feb 18, 2022 | P00001 | -$969.4K | W6QM MICC-FDO FT SAM HOUSTONOffice code W9124J | 722310 | M1FD |
| Feb 18, 2022 | P00002 | $1.98M | W6QM MICC-FDO FT SAM HOUSTONOffice code W9124J | 722310 | M1FD |
| Jan 31, 2022 | Base action | $969.4K | W6QM MICC-FDO FT SAM HOUSTONOffice code W9124J | 722310 | M1FD |
10 / Reading the Contract
How should this award record be interpreted?
Read the PIID as a transaction history, not as a single purchase price. Net obligations combine the base action with later increases, reductions, corrections, and deobligations recorded under the same contract.
Verify the buyer
Agency and office identify who manages the procurement relationship.
Follow modifications
Each action can change funding, scope, dates, or administrative terms.
Compare the market
Use NAICS, PSC, and the contractor profile to identify related buyers and competitors.