GETWAB

01 / Contract Profile

RS95 Federal Contract Award

Agency code 5700

THEATER DEPLOYABLE COMMUNICATIONS (TDC) INITIAL COMMUNICATION ELEMENT (ICE) V3.0

02 / Contract Size and Status

What is the recorded size and timing of this contract?

Net obligations$50.26M
Contract actions49
Potential value$0
Latest actionJan 26, 2024
Effective dateMay 11, 2007
Completion dateJun 16, 2019
NAICS markets1
PSC categories6

03 / Spending Trend

RS95 contract spending by fiscal year

Annual net obligations across the complete period available for this agency and PIID, from the first recorded fiscal year through the latest contract action.

Latest fiscal year obligations$0
FY 2024
Net obligationsComplete recorded range
Fiscal yearNet obligationsActionsChange
FY 2006$123.4K1
FY 2007$16.67M5+13,408.8%
FY 2008$17.49M16+4.9%
FY 2009$14.96M17−14.5%
FY 2010$969.6K6−93.5%
FY 2011$46.1K1−95.3%
FY 2013$02−100.0%
FY 2024$01

04 / Federal Buyer

Which organization manages this contract?

DepartmentContracting agencyContracting office
DEPT OF DEFENSEDEPT OF THE AIR FORCEFA8705 AFLCMC HNK SPACE

05 / Contractor

Who holds this federal contract?

NORTHROP GRUMMAN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INC

UEI CVRDPLPAR5D3 · CAGE 1V4D7

06 / NAICS Industries

Which industries classify this contract?

CodeDescriptionObligationsActionsShare
517110WIRED TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS$50.26M49100.0%

07 / Products and Services

What products or services were purchased?

CodeDescriptionObligationsActionsShare
D307AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEM SVCS$25.64M2651.0%
H258EQ TEST SVCS/COMMUNICATION EQUIP$16.93M833.7%
5810COMM SECURITY EQ & COMPS$7.47M814.9%
5895MISC COMMUNICATION EQ$132.7K20.3%
7035ADP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT$46.1K10.1%
AC66R&D-ELECTRONICS & COMM EQ-MGMT SUP$42.2K40.1%

08 / Place of Performance

Where is the work recorded?

SALT LAKE CITY, SALT LAKE, UTAH, UNITED STATES

ZIP 841162925

09 / Contract Actions

What modifications and obligations were recorded?

Signed dateModificationObligationContracting officeNAICSPSC
Jan 26, 202415$0FA8705 AFLCMC HNK SPACEOffice code FA87055171105810
Apr 26, 201315$0FA8726 AFLCMC HNK C3INOffice code FA8726517110D307
Apr 25, 201314$0FA8726 AFLCMC HNK C3INOffice code FA8726517110D307
Sep 21, 2011Base action$46.1KFA8721 AFLCMC PZE CMOffice code FA87215171107035
Dec 7, 201013$0FA8731 ESC 753 ELSG PKOffice code FA8731517110D307
Sep 9, 201012$0FA8731 ESC 753 ELSG PKOffice code FA8731517110D307
Jul 28, 201011$422.8KFA8731 ESC 753 ELSG PKOffice code FA8731517110D307
Apr 6, 201010$475.9KFA8731 ESC 753 ELSG PKOffice code FA8731517110D307
Apr 6, 201010$70.9KFA8731 ESC 753 ELSG PKOffice code FA8731517110D307
Feb 17, 201014$0FA8731 ESC 753 ELSG PKOffice code FA87315171105810
Dec 9, 200913$70.0KFA8731 ESC 753 ELSG PKOffice code FA87315171105810
Oct 28, 20091-$500FA8706 ESC 350 ELSG PKOffice code FA8706517110AC66
Oct 28, 20091$500FA8706 ESC 350 ELSG PKOffice code FA8706517110AC66
Jul 13, 20099$116.9KFA8731 ESC 753 ELSG PKOffice code FA8731517110D307
Jul 13, 20099-$744.8KFA8731 ESC 753 ELSG PKOffice code FA8731517110D307

10 / Reading the Contract

How should this award record be interpreted?

Read the PIID as a transaction history, not as a single purchase price. Net obligations combine the base action with later increases, reductions, corrections, and deobligations recorded under the same contract.

01

Verify the buyer

Agency and office identify who manages the procurement relationship.

02

Follow modifications

Each action can change funding, scope, dates, or administrative terms.

03

Compare the market

Use NAICS, PSC, and the contractor profile to identify related buyers and competitors.