01 / Contract Profile
80NSSC22K1245 Federal Contract Award
Agency code 8000
THE ARCTIC-BOREAL REGION, CHARACTERIZED BY VAST EXPANSES OF TUNDRA, BOREAL FORESTS AND WETLANDS, CONTINUES TO WARM MORE RAPIDLY THAN ELSEWHERE ON EARTH. REGIONAL WARMING, ASSOCIATED SHIFTS IN THE ANNUAL NON-FROZEN SEASON AND SIMULTANEOUS CHANGES IN HYDROLOGY, CAN GREATLY INCREASE ECOSYSTEM VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE. ABRUPT DISTURBANCES FROM FIRE AND THE RAPID THAW OF PERMAFROST ALSO THREATEN ECOSYSTEM STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION, INCLUDING CONTRIBUTIONS TO CARBON BUDGETS AND CLIMATE FORCING. HOW CHANGING ARCTIC-BOREAL SYSTEMS ARE IMPACTING CLIMATE UNDER CONTEMPORARY CONDITIONS IS NOT WELL UNDERSTOOD, AND HOW THESE ECOSYSTEMS MIGHT RESPOND UNDER FUTURE CLIMATE REMAINS HIGHLY UNCERTAIN. UNDERSTANDING HOW CHANGES IN ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND COMMUNITY STRUCTURE ULTIMATELY AFFECT ATMOSPHERIC RADIATIVE FORCING IS KEY TO IDENTIFYING THE ROLE OF THESE SYSTEMS IN AMPLIFYING OR MITIGATING CLIMATE CHANGE. A PRESSING CHALLENGE IS IMPROVING PROCESS-MODEL ESTIMATES OF CARBON DIOXIDE (CO2) AND METHANE (CH4) GAS EXCHANGE FOR HIGH LATITUDE TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS. MODELING STUDIES CONTINUE TO DISAGREE REGARDING THE: 1) NET CO2 SINK OR SOURCE STATUS FOR THE ARCTIC-BOREAL REGION 2) MAGNITUDES AND SPATIOTEMPORAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF CH4 FLUXES AND COMPONENTS (I.E., CONTRIBUTIONS FROM TERRESTRIAL VS. AQUATIC SYSTEMS EMISSION VS. UPTAKE) 3) REGIONAL TRAJECTORIES OF GAS EXCHANGE GIVEN FUTURE CLIMATE CONDITIONS AND ECOSYSTEM DISTURBANCES. REDUCING UNCERTAINTIES IN ECOSYSTEM CARBON BUDGETS IS NECESSARY TO IMPROVE OUR UNDERSTANDING OF HOW THE ARCTIC-BOREAL ZONE IS RESPONDING TO/IMPACTING CLIMATE. THIS STUDY FIRST FOCUSES ON IMPROVING ESTIMATES OF CO2 AND CH4 EXCHANGE FOR THE ARCTIC-BOREAL REGION THROUGH THE INTEGRATION OF TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC FIELD OBSERVATIONS, A SUITE OF REMOTE SENSING DATA AND PRODUCTS, AND MODELING (BIOGEOCHEMICAL AND ATMOSPHERIC). HERE WE FOCUS ON AN IMPROVED VERSION OF THE DYNAMIC VEGETATION DYNAMIC ORGANIC SOIL TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEM MODEL (DVM-DOS-TEM), WITH UPDATED ECOSYSTEM PARAMETERIZATIONS FOR TUNDRA, BOREAL FORESTS AND WETLANDS MADE POSSIBLE THROUGH NEW ABOVE SYNTHESIS DATASETS OF CARBON FLUX, ECOSYSTEM PROPERTIES, AND DISTURBANCE. SITE-LEVEL VALIDATIONS FOR DVM-DOS-TEM WILL EMPLOY A WEALTH OF DATA FROM MONITORING AND VALIDATION SITES WITHIN ALASKA, CANADA, AND SIBERIA WE WILL ALSO INCORPORATE ADDITIONAL GLOBAL AND REGIONAL (I.E., ABOVE) MODEL BENCHMARKING. TO ASSESS MODEL SKILL/UNCERTAINTY AT THE REGIONAL LEVEL, WE WILL USE A WRFSTILT (STOCHASTIC TIME-INVERTED LAGRANGIAN TRANSPORT MODEL DRIVEN BY A POLAR VARIANT OF WEATHER RESEARCH AND FORECASTING MODEL WINDS) APPROACH AND ATMOSPHERIC OBSERVATIONS FROM TALL TOWERS AND AIRCRAFT CAMPAIGNS. FURTHER, OUR STUDY INCLUDES A CARBON MODEL INTERCOMPARISON EFFORT TO BETTER IDENTIFY SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES IN CARBON BUDGET ESTIMATES AND ASSOCIATED UNCERTAINTIES ACROSS THE ABOVE DOMAIN AND EASTERN SIBERIA. WE WILL USE OUR NEW 0.25 DEGREE AND 1-KM MONTHLY CO2 AND CH4 FLUX RECORDS (2001-2021) FOR THE ARCTIC-BOREAL REGION, SATELLITEINFORMED RECORDS OF FIRE EMISSIONS AND ALBEDO TO IDENTIFY HOW ECOSYSTEMS ARE CONTRIBUTING TO NET RADIATIVE FORCING AND REGIONAL WARMING OR COOLING. OUR FINAL COMPONENT EXPLORES POSSIBLE FUTURE TRAJECTORIES OF NET ECOSYSTEM CARBON BUDGETS (NECB TERRESTRIAL & AQUATIC CARBON FLUX PLUS FIRE EMISSIONS) AND RADIATIVE FORCING UNDER ALTERNATIVE CLIMATE AND DISTURBANCE SCENARIOS THROUGH 2100. THIS RESEARCH DIRECTLY BENEFITS NASA BY PROVIDING IMPROVED UNDERSTANDING OF CLIMATE-CARBON CYCLE-DISTURBANCE FEEDBACKS IN ARCTICBOREAL SYSTEMS THROUGH ENHANCED REGIONAL PROCESS-MODEL ESTIMATES OF NECB, NEW RADIATIVE FORCING ASSESSMENTS THAT CONSIDER NECB AND ALBEDO, AND NEW EVALUATIONS OF HIGH LATITUDE ECOSYSTEM RESPONSE, INCLUDING NECB AND RADIATIVE FORCING, UNDER FUTURE CLIMATE SCENARIOS.
02 / Contract Size and Status
What is the recorded size and timing of this contract?
03 / Spending Trend
80NSSC22K1245 contract spending by fiscal year
Annual net obligations across the complete period available for this agency and PIID, from the first recorded fiscal year through the latest contract action.
| Fiscal year | Net obligations | Actions | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2022 | $195.5K | 1 | — |
| FY 2023 | $304.7K | 3 | +55.9% |
| FY 2024 | $286.3K | 1 | −6.0% |
| FY 2025 | $0 | 1 | −100.0% |
04 / Federal Buyer
Which organization manages this contract?
| Department | Contracting agency | Contracting office |
|---|---|---|
| NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION | NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION | NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTER |
05 / Contractor
Who holds this federal contract?
UEI F5HBB1KH19N4 · CAGE 1KWQ7
06 / NAICS Industries
Which industries classify this contract?
| Code | Description | Obligations | Actions | Share |
|---|
07 / Products and Services
What products or services were purchased?
| Code | Description | Obligations | Actions | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AJ11 | GENERAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY R&D SERVICES; GENERAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; BASIC RESEARCH | $786.5K | 6 | 100.0% |
08 / Place of Performance
Where is the work recorded?
ZIP 025401644
09 / Contract Actions
What modifications and obligations were recorded?
| Signed date | Modification | Obligation | Contracting office | NAICS | PSC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2025 | P00005 | $0 | NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTEROffice code 80NSSC | — | AJ11 |
| Sep 23, 2024 | P00004 | $286.3K | NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTEROffice code 80NSSC | — | AJ11 |
| Dec 22, 2023 | P00003 | $19.4K | NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTEROffice code 80NSSC | — | AJ11 |
| Sep 8, 2023 | P00002 | $80.6K | NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTEROffice code 80NSSC | — | AJ11 |
| Aug 3, 2023 | P00001 | $204.7K | NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTEROffice code 80NSSC | — | AJ11 |
| Aug 26, 2022 | Base action | $195.5K | NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTEROffice code 80NSSC | — | AJ11 |
10 / Reading the Contract
How should this award record be interpreted?
Read the PIID as a transaction history, not as a single purchase price. Net obligations combine the base action with later increases, reductions, corrections, and deobligations recorded under the same contract.
Verify the buyer
Agency and office identify who manages the procurement relationship.
Follow modifications
Each action can change funding, scope, dates, or administrative terms.
Compare the market
Use NAICS, PSC, and the contractor profile to identify related buyers and competitors.