GETWAB

01 / Contract Profile

80NSSC22K1245 Federal Contract Award

Agency code 8000

THE ARCTIC-BOREAL REGION, CHARACTERIZED BY VAST EXPANSES OF TUNDRA, BOREAL FORESTS AND WETLANDS, CONTINUES TO WARM MORE RAPIDLY THAN ELSEWHERE ON EARTH. REGIONAL WARMING, ASSOCIATED SHIFTS IN THE ANNUAL NON-FROZEN SEASON AND SIMULTANEOUS CHANGES IN HYDROLOGY, CAN GREATLY INCREASE ECOSYSTEM VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE. ABRUPT DISTURBANCES FROM FIRE AND THE RAPID THAW OF PERMAFROST ALSO THREATEN ECOSYSTEM STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION, INCLUDING CONTRIBUTIONS TO CARBON BUDGETS AND CLIMATE FORCING. HOW CHANGING ARCTIC-BOREAL SYSTEMS ARE IMPACTING CLIMATE UNDER CONTEMPORARY CONDITIONS IS NOT WELL UNDERSTOOD, AND HOW THESE ECOSYSTEMS MIGHT RESPOND UNDER FUTURE CLIMATE REMAINS HIGHLY UNCERTAIN. UNDERSTANDING HOW CHANGES IN ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND COMMUNITY STRUCTURE ULTIMATELY AFFECT ATMOSPHERIC RADIATIVE FORCING IS KEY TO IDENTIFYING THE ROLE OF THESE SYSTEMS IN AMPLIFYING OR MITIGATING CLIMATE CHANGE. A PRESSING CHALLENGE IS IMPROVING PROCESS-MODEL ESTIMATES OF CARBON DIOXIDE (CO2) AND METHANE (CH4) GAS EXCHANGE FOR HIGH LATITUDE TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS. MODELING STUDIES CONTINUE TO DISAGREE REGARDING THE: 1) NET CO2 SINK OR SOURCE STATUS FOR THE ARCTIC-BOREAL REGION 2) MAGNITUDES AND SPATIOTEMPORAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF CH4 FLUXES AND COMPONENTS (I.E., CONTRIBUTIONS FROM TERRESTRIAL VS. AQUATIC SYSTEMS EMISSION VS. UPTAKE) 3) REGIONAL TRAJECTORIES OF GAS EXCHANGE GIVEN FUTURE CLIMATE CONDITIONS AND ECOSYSTEM DISTURBANCES. REDUCING UNCERTAINTIES IN ECOSYSTEM CARBON BUDGETS IS NECESSARY TO IMPROVE OUR UNDERSTANDING OF HOW THE ARCTIC-BOREAL ZONE IS RESPONDING TO/IMPACTING CLIMATE. THIS STUDY FIRST FOCUSES ON IMPROVING ESTIMATES OF CO2 AND CH4 EXCHANGE FOR THE ARCTIC-BOREAL REGION THROUGH THE INTEGRATION OF TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC FIELD OBSERVATIONS, A SUITE OF REMOTE SENSING DATA AND PRODUCTS, AND MODELING (BIOGEOCHEMICAL AND ATMOSPHERIC). HERE WE FOCUS ON AN IMPROVED VERSION OF THE DYNAMIC VEGETATION DYNAMIC ORGANIC SOIL TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEM MODEL (DVM-DOS-TEM), WITH UPDATED ECOSYSTEM PARAMETERIZATIONS FOR TUNDRA, BOREAL FORESTS AND WETLANDS MADE POSSIBLE THROUGH NEW ABOVE SYNTHESIS DATASETS OF CARBON FLUX, ECOSYSTEM PROPERTIES, AND DISTURBANCE. SITE-LEVEL VALIDATIONS FOR DVM-DOS-TEM WILL EMPLOY A WEALTH OF DATA FROM MONITORING AND VALIDATION SITES WITHIN ALASKA, CANADA, AND SIBERIA WE WILL ALSO INCORPORATE ADDITIONAL GLOBAL AND REGIONAL (I.E., ABOVE) MODEL BENCHMARKING. TO ASSESS MODEL SKILL/UNCERTAINTY AT THE REGIONAL LEVEL, WE WILL USE A WRFSTILT (STOCHASTIC TIME-INVERTED LAGRANGIAN TRANSPORT MODEL DRIVEN BY A POLAR VARIANT OF WEATHER RESEARCH AND FORECASTING MODEL WINDS) APPROACH AND ATMOSPHERIC OBSERVATIONS FROM TALL TOWERS AND AIRCRAFT CAMPAIGNS. FURTHER, OUR STUDY INCLUDES A CARBON MODEL INTERCOMPARISON EFFORT TO BETTER IDENTIFY SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES IN CARBON BUDGET ESTIMATES AND ASSOCIATED UNCERTAINTIES ACROSS THE ABOVE DOMAIN AND EASTERN SIBERIA. WE WILL USE OUR NEW 0.25 DEGREE AND 1-KM MONTHLY CO2 AND CH4 FLUX RECORDS (2001-2021) FOR THE ARCTIC-BOREAL REGION, SATELLITEINFORMED RECORDS OF FIRE EMISSIONS AND ALBEDO TO IDENTIFY HOW ECOSYSTEMS ARE CONTRIBUTING TO NET RADIATIVE FORCING AND REGIONAL WARMING OR COOLING. OUR FINAL COMPONENT EXPLORES POSSIBLE FUTURE TRAJECTORIES OF NET ECOSYSTEM CARBON BUDGETS (NECB TERRESTRIAL & AQUATIC CARBON FLUX PLUS FIRE EMISSIONS) AND RADIATIVE FORCING UNDER ALTERNATIVE CLIMATE AND DISTURBANCE SCENARIOS THROUGH 2100. THIS RESEARCH DIRECTLY BENEFITS NASA BY PROVIDING IMPROVED UNDERSTANDING OF CLIMATE-CARBON CYCLE-DISTURBANCE FEEDBACKS IN ARCTICBOREAL SYSTEMS THROUGH ENHANCED REGIONAL PROCESS-MODEL ESTIMATES OF NECB, NEW RADIATIVE FORCING ASSESSMENTS THAT CONSIDER NECB AND ALBEDO, AND NEW EVALUATIONS OF HIGH LATITUDE ECOSYSTEM RESPONSE, INCLUDING NECB AND RADIATIVE FORCING, UNDER FUTURE CLIMATE SCENARIOS.

02 / Contract Size and Status

What is the recorded size and timing of this contract?

Net obligations$786.5K
Contract actions6
Potential value$0
Latest actionSep 15, 2025
Effective dateSep 15, 2025
Completion dateAug 31, 2026
NAICS markets0
PSC categories1

03 / Spending Trend

80NSSC22K1245 contract spending by fiscal year

Annual net obligations across the complete period available for this agency and PIID, from the first recorded fiscal year through the latest contract action.

Latest fiscal year obligations$0
FY 2025
Net obligationsComplete recorded range
Fiscal yearNet obligationsActionsChange
FY 2022$195.5K1
FY 2023$304.7K3+55.9%
FY 2024$286.3K1−6.0%
FY 2025$01−100.0%

04 / Federal Buyer

Which organization manages this contract?

05 / Contractor

Who holds this federal contract?

WOODWELL CLIMATE RESEARCH CENTER, INC.

UEI F5HBB1KH19N4 · CAGE 1KWQ7

06 / NAICS Industries

Which industries classify this contract?

CodeDescriptionObligationsActionsShare

07 / Products and Services

What products or services were purchased?

CodeDescriptionObligationsActionsShare
AJ11GENERAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY R&D SERVICES; GENERAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; BASIC RESEARCH$786.5K6100.0%

08 / Place of Performance

Where is the work recorded?

FALMOUTH, BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS, UNITED STATES

ZIP 025401644

09 / Contract Actions

What modifications and obligations were recorded?

Signed dateModificationObligationContracting officeNAICSPSC
Sep 15, 2025P00005$0NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTEROffice code 80NSSCAJ11
Sep 23, 2024P00004$286.3KNASA SHARED SERVICES CENTEROffice code 80NSSCAJ11
Dec 22, 2023P00003$19.4KNASA SHARED SERVICES CENTEROffice code 80NSSCAJ11
Sep 8, 2023P00002$80.6KNASA SHARED SERVICES CENTEROffice code 80NSSCAJ11
Aug 3, 2023P00001$204.7KNASA SHARED SERVICES CENTEROffice code 80NSSCAJ11
Aug 26, 2022Base action$195.5KNASA SHARED SERVICES CENTEROffice code 80NSSCAJ11

10 / Reading the Contract

How should this award record be interpreted?

Read the PIID as a transaction history, not as a single purchase price. Net obligations combine the base action with later increases, reductions, corrections, and deobligations recorded under the same contract.

01

Verify the buyer

Agency and office identify who manages the procurement relationship.

02

Follow modifications

Each action can change funding, scope, dates, or administrative terms.

03

Compare the market

Use NAICS, PSC, and the contractor profile to identify related buyers and competitors.