01 / Contract Profile
HC104724F0069 Federal Contract Award
Agency code 97AK
MIGRATION OF THE DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY FROM THEIR LEGACY NETWORK TO THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE NETWORK.
02 / Contract Size and Status
What is the recorded size and timing of this contract?
03 / Spending Trend
HC104724F0069 contract spending by fiscal year
Annual net obligations across the complete period available for this agency and PIID, from the first recorded fiscal year through the latest contract action.
Latest fiscal year obligations$1.91M
FY 2026Net obligationsComplete recorded range
| Fiscal year | Net obligations | Actions | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2024 | $4.74M | 2 | — |
| FY 2025 | $3.15M | 4 | −33.5% |
| FY 2026 | $1.91M | 4 | −39.5% |
04 / Federal Buyer
Which organization manages this contract?
| Department | Contracting agency | Contracting office |
|---|---|---|
| DEPT OF DEFENSE | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY (DISA) | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY |
05 / Contractor
Who holds this federal contract?
LEIDOS, INC.
UEI QLNMVC12KWY3 · CAGE 5UTE2
06 / NAICS Industries
Which industries classify this contract?
| Code | Description | Obligations | Actions | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 541512 | COMPUTER SYSTEMS DESIGN SERVICES | $9.80M | 10 | 100.0% |
07 / Products and Services
What products or services were purchased?
| Code | Description | Obligations | Actions | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DA01 | IT AND TELECOM - BUSINESS APPLICATION/APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (LABOR) | $9.80M | 10 | 100.0% |
08 / Place of Performance
Where is the work recorded?
FORT GEORGE G MEADE, ANNE ARUNDEL, MARYLAND, UNITED STATES
ZIP 207553524
09 / Contract Actions
What modifications and obligations were recorded?
| Signed date | Modification | Obligation | Contracting office | NAICS | PSC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2026 | P00009 | $0 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCYOffice code HC1047 | 541512 | DA01 |
| Apr 13, 2026 | P00008 | $732.7K | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCYOffice code HC1047 | 541512 | DA01 |
| Feb 13, 2026 | P00007 | $1.17M | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCYOffice code HC1047 | 541512 | DA01 |
| Jan 9, 2026 | P00006 | $0 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCYOffice code HC1047 | 541512 | DA01 |
| Nov 14, 2025 | P00005 | $0 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCYOffice code HC1047 | 541512 | DA01 |
| Sep 29, 2025 | P00004 | $1.36M | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCYOffice code HC1047 | 541512 | DA01 |
| Jun 11, 2025 | P00003 | $1.79M | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCYOffice code HC1047 | 541512 | DA01 |
| Mar 20, 2025 | P00002 | $0 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCYOffice code HC1047 | 541512 | DA01 |
| Nov 25, 2024 | P00001 | $0 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCYOffice code HC1047 | 541512 | DA01 |
| Sep 27, 2024 | Base action | $4.74M | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCYOffice code HC1047 | 541512 | DA01 |
10 / Reading the Contract
How should this award record be interpreted?
Read the PIID as a transaction history, not as a single purchase price. Net obligations combine the base action with later increases, reductions, corrections, and deobligations recorded under the same contract.
Verify the buyer
Agency and office identify who manages the procurement relationship.
Follow modifications
Each action can change funding, scope, dates, or administrative terms.
Compare the market
Use NAICS, PSC, and the contractor profile to identify related buyers and competitors.