01 / PSC Market Profile
PSC AC45 R&D- Defense System: Tank/Automotive (Operational Systems Development) Federal Contracts
Product and Service Code AC45
Federal contract activity classified under R&D- Defense System: Tank/Automotive (Operational Systems Development) across FY 2019–FY 2025. Net obligations include both new obligations and subsequent deobligations.
02 / Market Size
How large is the PSC AC45 federal market?
03 / Spending Trend
PSC AC45 contract spending by fiscal year
Annual obligations, activity, and participation across the same FY 2019–FY 2025 profile window.
Latest closed fiscal year$0
FY 2025| Fiscal year | Obligations | Actions | Vendors | Customers | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2019 | -$21.8K | 1 | 1 | 1 | — |
| FY 2020 | -$15.6K | 1 | 1 | 1 | +28.4% |
| FY 2021 | $0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +100.0% |
| FY 2022 | -$34.2K | 1 | 1 | 1 | — |
| FY 2023 | $0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +100.0% |
| FY 2024 | $0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | — |
| FY 2025 | $0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
04 / Top Federal Customers
Which federal agencies buy most in this industry?
Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.
| Federal customer | Code | Obligations | Actions | Vendors | Market share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEPT OF THE NAVY | 1700 | -$15.6K | 1 | 1 | 21.8% |
| DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DCMA) | 9763 | -$56.0K | 4 | 4 | 78.2% |
05 / Contracting Offices
Which contracting offices buy in PSC AC45?
Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.
| Office | Code | Agency | Obligations | Actions | Vendors | Market share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCMA MID-ATLANTIC | S2404A | DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DCMA) | $0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH SAN DIEGO | N66018 | DEPT OF THE NAVY | -$15.6K | 1 | 1 | 21.8% |
| DCMA SOUTHEAST (ATLANTA) | S1103A | DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DCMA) | -$21.8K | 1 | 1 | 30.4% |
| DCMA RADARS & SENSORS (LOS ANGELES) | S0539A | DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DCMA) | -$34.2K | 1 | 1 | 47.8% |
06 / Top Vendors
Which contractors lead the PSC AC45 market?
| Vendor | Obligations | Actions | Customers | Market share | Latest activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RE2, INC | $0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | Apr 24, 2024 |
| RE2 LLC | $0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | May 21, 2024 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN | -$15.6K | 1 | 1 | 21.8% | Apr 8, 2020 |
| MILOW LTD | -$21.8K | 1 | 1 | 30.4% | May 1, 2019 |
| RAYTHEON CORPORATE | -$34.2K | 1 | 1 | 47.8% | Sep 6, 2022 |
07 / Industry Mix
What industries are purchased under PSC AC45?
08 / Buying Pattern
How does the government buy in PSC AC45?
| Common action type | Obligations | Actions |
|---|---|---|
| DEFINITIVE CONTRACT | -$21.8K | 3 |
| DELIVERY ORDER | -$49.8K | 2 |
09 / Recent Contract Awards
What was awarded most recently in PSC AC45?
| Award / PIID | Vendor | Signed date | Obligation | NAICS | Agency / office |
|---|
10 / Market Interpretation
How should contractors evaluate this market?
Start with the spending direction
Compare annual obligations with actions and vendor participation. Growth driven by only a few large actions represents a different opportunity from broad, recurring demand.
Follow the actual buyers
Move from federal customers to contracting offices. Offices reveal where acquisition responsibility and recurring purchasing activity are concentrated.
Measure accessible demand
Use competition, small-business participation, incumbent vendors, and PSC mix before treating the full -$71.6K market as addressable.