01 / Vendor Profile
DESIGN ALASKA INC Federal Contracts and Awards
UEI JK2NRCHYK4N6 · CAGE 0LEH4
Federal contract activity attributed to this vendor identity across FY 2020–FY 2026. Obligations are FPDS accounting transactions, not company revenue.
02 / Federal Business Size
Federal contract market at a glance
Measured consistently across FY 2020–FY 2026.
Across FY 2020–FY 2026, FPDS records attribute $28.13M in net contract obligations to DESIGN ALASKA INC across 210 contract actions. Net obligations include positive obligations and later deobligations recorded during the same period.
03 / Spending Trend
DESIGN ALASKA INC contract spending by year
Annual net obligations show whether recorded federal business expanded or contracted, while actions and customer counts show the breadth of that activity.
Total obligations$8.14M
FY 2026ObligationsHistorical spending range
| Fiscal year | Obligations | Actions | Federal customers | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2020 | $1.67M | 27 | 6 | — |
| FY 2021 | $6.09M | 41 | 6 | +265.1% |
| FY 2022 | $1.83M | 36 | 5 | −69.9% |
| FY 2023 | $2.09M | 25 | 5 | +14.0% |
| FY 2024 | $1.69M | 27 | 4 | −19.1% |
| FY 2025 | $6.61M | 30 | 4 | +291.0% |
| FY 2026 | $8.14M | 24 | 5 | +23.2% |
04 / Federal Customers
Which federal agencies buy from DESIGN ALASKA INC?
Ranked by net obligations during FY 2020–FY 2026.
| Agency | Code | Obligations | Actions | Vendor share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5700 | $10.93M | 50 | 38.9% | |
| 2100 | $9.84M | 23 | 35.0% | |
| 1422 | $3.69M | 51 | 13.1% | |
| 1443 | $3.59M | 67 | 12.8% | |
| 7008 | $75.3K | 6 | 0.3% | |
| 1448 | $8.5K | 11 | 0.0% | |
| 6920 | -$4.6K | 2 | 0.0% |
05 / Contracting Offices
Which contracting offices buy from DESIGN ALASKA INC?
Ranked by net obligations during FY 2020–FY 2026.
| Office | Code | Agency | Obligations | Actions | Vendor share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA5004 | DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE | $10.03M | 47 | 35.7% | |
| W911KB | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $9.90M | 21 | 35.2% | |
| 140L06 | BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT | $3.69M | 51 | 13.1% | |
| 140P20 | NATIONAL PARK SERVICE | $2.82M | 48 | 10.0% | |
| FA5000 | DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE | $898.3K | 3 | 3.2% | |
| 140P97 | NATIONAL PARK SERVICE | $773.6K | 19 | 2.8% | |
| 70Z087 | U.S. COAST GUARD | $75.3K | 6 | 0.3% | |
| 140F03 | U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE | $24.4K | 1 | 0.1% | |
| W50S6K | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $2.5K | 1 | 0.0% | |
| 697DCK | FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION | -$4.6K | 2 | 0.0% |
06 / Top NAICS Industries
Which industries define this vendor’s federal work?
07 / Top Product and Service Codes
What products and services does the government buy from this vendor?
| PSC | Description | Obligations | Actions | Customers | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C219 | ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- GENERAL: OTHER | $11.49M | 67 | 5 | 40.8% |
| C211 | ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- GENERAL: LANDSCAPING, INTERIOR LAYOUT, AND DESIGNING | $7.79M | 126 | 6 | 27.7% |
| C1ME | ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- CONSTRUCTION: EPG FACILITIES - NUCLEAR | $6.94M | 1 | 1 | 24.7% |
| C1NB | ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- CONSTRUCTION: HEATING AND COOLING PLANTS | $1.48M | 2 | 1 | 5.3% |
| C212 | ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- GENERAL: ENGINEERING DRAFTING, NOT CAD/CAM | $260.7K | 5 | 2 | 0.9% |
| C220 | ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- GENERAL: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING | $178.6K | 5 | 1 | 0.6% |
| C1AA | ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- CONSTRUCTION: OFFICE BUILDINGS | -$4.2K | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| C1BA | ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- CONSTRUCTION: AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWERS | -$4.6K | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
08 / Competition Pattern
How was DESIGN ALASKA INC’s federal work competed?
Competition categories describe the procurement path recorded on the underlying contract actions.
09 / Recent Contract Awards
What contract actions were recorded most recently for DESIGN ALASKA INC?
The latest recorded PIIDs connect this profile to the underlying federal award search.
| Award / PIID | Signed | Obligation | Agency / office | NAICS | PSC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 140L0623F0150 | Sep 4, 2026 | $56.1K | BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT NATIONAL OPERATIONS CENTER | 541330 | C211 |
10 / Interpreting the Profile
How should you evaluate DESIGN ALASKA INC as a federal contractor?
Read obligations, customers, markets, competition, and individual awards together. A large historical total indicates federal scale, but it does not by itself describe current backlog, commercial revenue, profitability, or future opportunity.
Separate obligations from revenue
FPDS obligations are government accounting actions and may include later deobligations.
Follow customer concentration
Agency and office concentration reveals where the vendor’s federal relationships are strongest.
Test market overlap
NAICS and PSC shares show whether the vendor competes in the same markets as your company.
Inspect the awards
Open the PIIDs to verify dates, offices, classifications, and transaction history.