01 / Vendor Profile
GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK CO, LLC Federal Contracts and Awards
UEI M9LFLA6K8HE4 · CAGE 1BSU5
Federal contract activity attributed to this vendor identity across FY 2019–FY 2025. Obligations are FPDS accounting transactions, not company revenue.
02 / Federal Business Size
Federal contract market at a glance
Measured consistently across FY 2019–FY 2025.
Across FY 2019–FY 2025, FPDS records attribute $3.36B in net contract obligations to GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK CO, LLC across 840 contract actions. Net obligations include positive obligations and later deobligations recorded during the same period.
03 / Spending Trend
GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK CO, LLC contract spending by year
Annual net obligations show whether recorded federal business expanded or contracted, while actions and customer counts show the breadth of that activity.
Total obligations$336.60M
FY 2025ObligationsHistorical spending range
| Fiscal year | Obligations | Actions | Federal customers | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2019 | $575.81M | 116 | 1 | — |
| FY 2020 | $490.48M | 158 | 1 | −14.8% |
| FY 2021 | $505.05M | 114 | 1 | +3.0% |
| FY 2022 | $288.67M | 120 | 1 | −42.8% |
| FY 2023 | $527.92M | 119 | 1 | +82.9% |
| FY 2024 | $636.06M | 108 | 1 | +20.5% |
| FY 2025 | $336.60M | 105 | 1 | −47.1% |
04 / Federal Customers
Which federal agencies buy from GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK CO, LLC?
Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.
| Agency | Code | Obligations | Actions | Vendor share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2100 | $3.36B | 840 | 100.0% |
05 / Contracting Offices
Which contracting offices buy from GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK CO, LLC?
Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.
| Office | Code | Agency | Obligations | Actions | Vendor share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W912HY | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $834.42M | 110 | 24.8% | |
| W912EP | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $569.25M | 178 | 16.9% | |
| W912BU | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $474.19M | 119 | 14.1% | |
| W91278 | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $279.87M | 35 | 8.3% | |
| W912P8 | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $257.41M | 55 | 7.7% | |
| W912DS | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $241.14M | 98 | 7.2% | |
| W912HP | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $221.82M | 49 | 6.6% | |
| W912PM | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $168.70M | 80 | 5.0% | |
| W912WJ | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $104.23M | 28 | 3.1% | |
| W912DR | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $82.96M | 20 | 2.5% |
06 / Top NAICS Industries
Which industries define this vendor’s federal work?
07 / Top Product and Service Codes
What products and services does the government buy from this vendor?
| PSC | Description | Obligations | Actions | Customers | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z1KF | MAINTENANCE OF DREDGING FACILITIES | $1.04B | 261 | 1 | 31.0% |
| Y1KF | CONSTRUCTION OF DREDGING FACILITIES | $785.37M | 223 | 1 | 23.4% |
| Y1KB | CONSTRUCTION OF CANALS | $641.96M | 65 | 1 | 19.1% |
| Z1KB | MAINTENANCE OF CANALS | $339.71M | 46 | 1 | 10.1% |
| Z2KF | REPAIR OR ALTERATION OF DREDGING FACILITIES | $128.35M | 44 | 1 | 3.8% |
| Y1PZ | CONSTRUCTION OF OTHER NON-BUILDING FACILITIES | $127.75M | 57 | 1 | 3.8% |
| Y1KZ | CONSTRUCTION OF OTHER CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT FACILITIES | $121.46M | 29 | 1 | 3.6% |
| 3895 | MISCELLANEOUS CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT | $57.02M | 22 | 1 | 1.7% |
| Y1QA | CONSTRUCTION OF RESTORATION OF REAL PROPERTY (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE) | $40.95M | 17 | 1 | 1.2% |
| M1KF | OPERATION OF DREDGING FACILITIES | $19.75M | 26 | 1 | 0.6% |
08 / Competition Pattern
How was GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK CO, LLC’s federal work competed?
Competition categories describe the procurement path recorded on the underlying contract actions.
09 / Recent Contract Awards
What contract actions were recorded most recently for GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK CO, LLC?
The latest recorded PIIDs connect this profile to the underlying federal award search.
| Award / PIID | Signed | Obligation | Agency / office | NAICS | PSC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W912EP25CA012 | Sep 26, 2025 | $19.18M | DEPT OF THE ARMY W074 ENDIST JACKSNVLLE | 237990 | Z2KF |
10 / Interpreting the Profile
How should you evaluate GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK CO, LLC as a federal contractor?
Read obligations, customers, markets, competition, and individual awards together. A large historical total indicates federal scale, but it does not by itself describe current backlog, commercial revenue, profitability, or future opportunity.
Separate obligations from revenue
FPDS obligations are government accounting actions and may include later deobligations.
Follow customer concentration
Agency and office concentration reveals where the vendor’s federal relationships are strongest.
Test market overlap
NAICS and PSC shares show whether the vendor competes in the same markets as your company.
Inspect the awards
Open the PIIDs to verify dates, offices, classifications, and transaction history.