01 / Vendor Profile
INLAND DREDGING COMPANY, L.L.C. Federal Contracts and Awards
UEI NPJLGH6HJDD5 · CAGE 093F7
Federal contract activity attributed to this vendor identity across FY 2019–FY 2025. Obligations are FPDS accounting transactions, not company revenue.
02 / Federal Business Size
Federal contract market at a glance
Measured consistently across FY 2019–FY 2025.
Across FY 2019–FY 2025, FPDS records attribute $409.31M in net contract obligations to INLAND DREDGING COMPANY, L.L.C. across 271 contract actions. Net obligations include positive obligations and later deobligations recorded during the same period.
03 / Spending Trend
INLAND DREDGING COMPANY, L.L.C. contract spending by year
Annual net obligations show whether recorded federal business expanded or contracted, while actions and customer counts show the breadth of that activity.
Total obligations$66.08M
FY 2025ObligationsHistorical spending range
| Fiscal year | Obligations | Actions | Federal customers | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2019 | $27.57M | 19 | 1 | — |
| FY 2020 | $30.30M | 30 | 1 | +9.9% |
| FY 2021 | $82.38M | 33 | 1 | +171.9% |
| FY 2022 | $54.64M | 50 | 1 | −33.7% |
| FY 2023 | $75.33M | 42 | 1 | +37.9% |
| FY 2024 | $73.01M | 53 | 1 | −3.1% |
| FY 2025 | $66.08M | 44 | 1 | −9.5% |
04 / Federal Customers
Which federal agencies buy from INLAND DREDGING COMPANY, L.L.C.?
Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.
| Agency | Code | Obligations | Actions | Vendor share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2100 | $409.31M | 271 | 100.0% |
05 / Contracting Offices
Which contracting offices buy from INLAND DREDGING COMPANY, L.L.C.?
Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.
| Office | Code | Agency | Obligations | Actions | Vendor share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W91278 | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $162.75M | 110 | 39.8% | |
| W912HY | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $114.18M | 83 | 27.9% | |
| W912EE | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $55.69M | 32 | 13.6% | |
| W912P8 | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $41.48M | 28 | 10.1% | |
| W912EQ | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $37.01M | 14 | 9.0% | |
| W912EP | DEPT OF THE ARMY | -$2.5K | 1 | 0.0% | |
| W9126G | DEPT OF THE ARMY | -$1.80M | 3 | -0.4% |
06 / Top NAICS Industries
Which industries define this vendor’s federal work?
| NAICS | Description | Obligations | Actions | Customers | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 237990 | OTHER HEAVY AND CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION | $409.31M | 271 | 1 | 100.0% |
07 / Top Product and Service Codes
What products and services does the government buy from this vendor?
| PSC | Description | Obligations | Actions | Customers | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y1KF | CONSTRUCTION OF DREDGING FACILITIES | $141.52M | 92 | 1 | 34.6% |
| Z1KF | MAINTENANCE OF DREDGING FACILITIES | $73.77M | 51 | 1 | 18.0% |
| Y1KB | CONSTRUCTION OF CANALS | $62.46M | 47 | 1 | 15.3% |
| Z1KB | MAINTENANCE OF CANALS | $40.40M | 33 | 1 | 9.9% |
| X1KF | LEASE/RENTAL OF DREDGING FACILITIES | $29.87M | 18 | 1 | 7.3% |
| C1KF | ARCHITECT AND ENGINEERING- CONSTRUCTION: DREDGING FACILITIES | $24.24M | 7 | 1 | 5.9% |
| M1KF | OPERATION OF DREDGING FACILITIES | $16.86M | 6 | 1 | 4.1% |
| Z2KB | REPAIR OR ALTERATION OF CANALS | $12.77M | 7 | 1 | 3.1% |
| Y1KZ | CONSTRUCTION OF OTHER CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT FACILITIES | $4.98M | 1 | 1 | 1.2% |
| Y1PZ | CONSTRUCTION OF OTHER NON-BUILDING FACILITIES | $4.23M | 4 | 1 | 1.0% |
08 / Competition Pattern
How was INLAND DREDGING COMPANY, L.L.C.’s federal work competed?
Competition categories describe the procurement path recorded on the underlying contract actions.
09 / Recent Contract Awards
What contract actions were recorded most recently for INLAND DREDGING COMPANY, L.L.C.?
The latest recorded PIIDs connect this profile to the underlying federal award search.
| Award / PIID | Signed | Obligation | Agency / office | NAICS | PSC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W912P824C0035 | Sep 29, 2025 | $560.0K | DEPT OF THE ARMY W07V ENDIST NEW ORLEANS | 237990 | Y1KF |
10 / Interpreting the Profile
How should you evaluate INLAND DREDGING COMPANY, L.L.C. as a federal contractor?
Read obligations, customers, markets, competition, and individual awards together. A large historical total indicates federal scale, but it does not by itself describe current backlog, commercial revenue, profitability, or future opportunity.
Separate obligations from revenue
FPDS obligations are government accounting actions and may include later deobligations.
Follow customer concentration
Agency and office concentration reveals where the vendor’s federal relationships are strongest.
Test market overlap
NAICS and PSC shares show whether the vendor competes in the same markets as your company.
Inspect the awards
Open the PIIDs to verify dates, offices, classifications, and transaction history.