GETWAB

02 / Federal Business Size

Federal contract market at a glance

Measured consistently across FY 2019–FY 2025.

Net obligations$9.32M
Contract actions75
Awards / PIIDs45
Federal customers6
Contracting offices17
Average action$124.3K
Active fiscal years7
Data coverageFY 2019–FY 2025

Across FY 2019–FY 2025, FPDS records attribute $9.32M in net contract obligations to MILITARY SYSTEMS GROUP, INC. across 75 contract actions. Net obligations include positive obligations and later deobligations recorded during the same period.

03 / Spending Trend

MILITARY SYSTEMS GROUP, INC. contract spending by year

Annual net obligations show whether recorded federal business expanded or contracted, while actions and customer counts show the breadth of that activity.

Total obligations$780.0K
FY 2025
ObligationsHistorical spending range
Fiscal yearObligationsActionsFederal customersChange
FY 2019$813.6K72
FY 2020$692.3K102−14.9%
FY 2021$4.09M54+490.9%
FY 2022$548.7K93−86.6%
FY 2023$1.48M94+169.2%
FY 2024$921.3K275−37.6%
FY 2025$780.0K82−15.3%

04 / Federal Customers

Which federal agencies buy from MILITARY SYSTEMS GROUP, INC.?

Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.

AgencyCodeObligationsActionsVendor share
2100$7.08M4075.9%
1700$1.75M1618.8%
97AS$319.0K53.4%
5700$147.9K71.6%
4732$23.1K60.2%
9763$010.0%

05 / Contracting Offices

Which contracting offices buy from MILITARY SYSTEMS GROUP, INC.?

Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.

OfficeCodeAgencyObligationsActionsVendor share
W15QKNDEPT OF THE ARMY$5.64M2360.5%
N00178DEPT OF THE NAVY$1.75M1518.8%
W911N2DEPT OF THE ARMY$770.9K118.3%
W56HZVDEPT OF THE ARMY$533.7K35.7%
SPE7M1DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY$237.7K42.5%
W911S2DEPT OF THE ARMY$101.7K11.1%
SPE7M0DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY$81.3K10.9%
FA5422DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE$48.9K10.5%
FA9401DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE$40.9K20.4%
FA4427DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE$28.5K20.3%

06 / Top NAICS Industries

Which industries define this vendor’s federal work?

NAICSDescriptionObligationsActionsCustomersShare
332994SMALL ARMS, ORDNANCE, AND ORDNANCE ACCESSORIES MANUFACTURING$5.76M28461.8%
332721PRECISION TURNED PRODUCT MANUFACTURING$1.77M16219.0%
336992MILITARY ARMORED VEHICLE, TANK, AND TANK COMPONENT MANUFACTURING$819.8K1228.8%
336999ALL OTHER TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING$774.5K618.3%
336390OTHER MOTOR VEHICLE PARTS MANUFACTURING$101.7K111.1%
315999OTHER APPAREL ACCESSORIES AND OTHER APPAREL MANUFACTURING$97.0K1131.0%
541715RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY)$1.0K110.0%

07 / Top Product and Service Codes

What products and services does the government buy from this vendor?

PSCDescriptionObligationsActionsCustomersShare
1095MISCELLANEOUS WEAPONS$4.48M8248.1%
5342HARDWARE, WEAPON SYSTEM$1.82M17219.6%
1005GUNS, THROUGH 30MM$897.5K1539.6%
2590MISCELLANEOUS VEHICULAR COMPONENTS$836.4K1939.0%
2541WEAPONS SYSTEMS SPECIFIC VEHICULAR ACCESSORIES$823.4K728.8%
1260FIRE CONTROL DESIGNATING AND INDICATING EQUIPMENT$319.0K513.4%
2510VEHICULAR CAB, BODY, AND FRAME STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS$101.7K111.1%
1035GUNS, OVER 300MM$19.6K110.2%
1250FIRE CONTROL STABILIZING MECHANISMS$17.2K110.2%
AC13NATIONAL DEFENSE R&D SERVICES; DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE - MILITARY; EXPERIMENTAL DEVELOPMENT$1.0K110.0%

08 / Competition Pattern

How was MILITARY SYSTEMS GROUP, INC.’s federal work competed?

Competition categories describe the procurement path recorded on the underlying contract actions.

Competition categoryObligationsActions
Not available for competition$5.69M24
Not competed under SAP$2.53M22
Competed$97.0K11
Competed under SAP$516.8K10
Not competed$495.8K8

09 / Recent Contract Awards

What contract actions were recorded most recently for MILITARY SYSTEMS GROUP, INC.?

The latest recorded PIIDs connect this profile to the underlying federal award search.

Award / PIIDSignedObligationAgency / officeNAICSPSC
W15QKN25F0480Sep 29, 2025$555DEPT OF THE ARMY W6QK ACC-RI-PICATINNY3369992541

10 / Interpreting the Profile

How should you evaluate MILITARY SYSTEMS GROUP, INC. as a federal contractor?

Read obligations, customers, markets, competition, and individual awards together. A large historical total indicates federal scale, but it does not by itself describe current backlog, commercial revenue, profitability, or future opportunity.

01

Separate obligations from revenue

FPDS obligations are government accounting actions and may include later deobligations.

02

Follow customer concentration

Agency and office concentration reveals where the vendor’s federal relationships are strongest.

03

Test market overlap

NAICS and PSC shares show whether the vendor competes in the same markets as your company.

04

Inspect the awards

Open the PIIDs to verify dates, offices, classifications, and transaction history.