GETWAB

01 / Federal Opportunity Brief

59--WIRING HARNESS

Status
Active
Deadline
Nov 16, 2026 2:00 PM GMT-0400
Solicitation
N0038326RNA53
Updated
Oct 16, 2026
NAICS
335931
PSC
5995

02 / Federal Buyer

Who is buying?

03 / Purchase

What is the government buying?

Requirement

59--WIRING HARNESS
The current notice is soliciting this requirement from eligible offerors.

Scope available now

The evidence does not describe the actual wiring harness deliverables or full statement-of-work scope. One procedural requirement is partially visible (quality control documentation), and there is a general compliance statement for all items to meet the Statement of Work requirements.

Contract vehicle

The evidence indicates the Government issues a contract/delivery order/purchase order/modification when properly transmitted, but it does not describe a specific vehicle type (e.g., IDIQ) or how future task orders are issued.

How work is assigned

The evidence does not describe how work is assigned beyond the general issuance of a contract/delivery order/purchase order/modification.

04 / Contracting Requirements

How will this procurement work?

RequirementWhat the notice saysSource status
EligibilityThe evidence states SBA reviewed the requirement and determined a set-aside recommendation was not applicable.Confirmed
Contract ceilingNot disclosedNot Disclosed
Minimum guaranteeNot disclosedNot Disclosed
Contract durationNot disclosedNot Disclosed
Foreign participationNot disclosedNot Disclosed
Proposal and award procedureSubmission method is described (email) and there is an LPTA evaluation statement. However, the evidence does not provide detailed submission instructions beyond email/receipt, and it does not provide detailed evaluation factors or technical acceptability criteria.Partially Confirmed
Staffing and securityNo staffing requirements or security/clearance requirements are stated in the provided evidence.Not Disclosed
Read the original SAM.gov description

CONTACT INFORMATION|4|N731.52|N00383|771-229-0490|jake.kucowski.civ@us.navy.mil| ITEM UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AND VALUATION (JAN 2023)|19|||||||||||||||||||| HIGHER-LEVEL CONTRACT QUALITY REQUIREMENT|8|X|||||||| STOP-WORK ORDER (AUG 1989)|1|| WIDE AREA WORKFLOW PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS (JAN 2023)|16|Invoice and Receiving Report Combo |Source|TBD|N00383|TBD|TBD|See Schedule|TBD||||||||| NAVY USE OF ABILITYONE SUPPORT CONTRACTOR - RELEASE OF OFFEROR INFORMATION (3-18))|1|| MANDATORY USE OF WORKFLOW PRO (WFP) MOD ASSIST MODULE|1|| VALUE ENGINEERING (JUN 2020)|3|||| INTEGRITY OF UNIT PRICES (NOV 2021)|1|| EQUAL OPPORTUITY FOR WORKERS WITH DISABILITIES (DEV 2026-O0040)(FEB 2026)|4||||| TRANSPORTATION OF SUPPLIES BY SEA (OCT 2024)|2||| BUY AMERICAN-FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS-BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM-BASIC (FEB 2024)|11|||||||||||| LIMITATION OF LIABILITY--HIGH-VALUE ITEMS (FEB 1997)|1|| LIMITATIONS ON PASS-THROUGH CHARGES (DEV 2026-O0048)(MAR 2026)|1|| SECURITY PROHIBITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS (CLASS DEVIATION 2026-O0025)(FEB 2026)|7|||||||| BUY AMERICAN-FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS-BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM CERTIFICATE-BASIC (FEB 2024))|5|||||| BUY AMERICAN--BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM CERTIFICATE-BASIC (FEB 2024)|1|| ALTERNATE A, ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (DEVIATION 2026-O0043)(FEB 2026))|13|||||||||||||| ROYALTY INFORMATION (APR 1984)|1|| NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, ANDENERGY PROGRAM USE (APR 2008))|2||DO rated order certified for National Defense - Do-A1A| ONLY ONE OFFER (DEVIATION 2026-O0048)(MAR 2026)|1|| This RFP is for a spares buy and will be using competitive procedures. This requirement will be awarded to the offeror with the lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) quote. The Small Business Administration representative at NAVSUP WSS has reviewed this requirement and determined that a set-aside recommendation was not applicable for this procurement. Quotes may be emailed to the below email address and must be received on or before on the closing date listed on page 1 of the solicitation. Jake.Kucowski.civ@us.navy.mil. This contract/delivery order/purchase order/modification is issued by the Government when deposited in the mail, transmitted by facsimile or sent by any electronic commerce method, including email. The Government's acceptance of the contractor's proposal constitutes bilateral agreement to issue this contract/delivery order/purchase order/modification. \ 1. SCOPE 1.1 . Markings shall be in accordance with MIL-STD-130. 2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS - NOT APPLICABLE 3. REQUIREMENTS The contractor shall maintain a quality control system which meets the requirements of Mil-I-45208A, Mil-Q 9858,ISO-9000 / 9001 / 9002 or equivalent. RESPONSIBILITY FOR INSPECTION: Unless otherwise specified, the contractor is responsible for the performance of all inspection requirements as specified herein. Except as otherwise specified, the contractor may use his own or any other facility suitable for the performance of the inspection requirements specified herein. PROCEDURES:The contractor shall prepare and maintain Quality Control Documentation, test and repair procedures, and inspection procedures which shall be made available to the Government for review and approval. The procedures shall include sequential diagrams of the test, repair, and inspection process, as well as the performance spcifications to perform the procedures. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM PLAN: The contractor shall develop, implement and maintain a Repair Quality Plan in compliance with the requirements of Mil-I-45208A, Mil-Q-9858, ISO,9000 / 9001 / 9002, or equvalent.The plan shall define the specific methods by which compliance with contractual requirements will be assured. All quality assurance data shall be provided to the Government for review and approval upon request. PURCHASED MATERIAL CONTROL: The contractor shall establish and maintain a system of control over purchased material which shall assure that the necessary requirements of this contract are included. in all sub contract agreements. A parts control system shall establish a record of performance for each purchased and internally manufactured part and shall be used to evaluate continued use of the source. The contractors control system shall be in compliance wil either Mil-I 45208A/Mil-Q-9858 or equivalent Quality Quality Assurance Standared.(ISO/AS:9000, 9001, 9002). RECEIVING INSPECTION OF PURCHASED MATERIAL: Purchased items shall be inspected upon receipt at the contractors facility to assure conformance with all requirements of the Technical Data Package (TDP). Evidence of such inspections shall be maintained for Government review at least twelve (12) months following acceptance of the end item. Inspection reports shall be maintained by the contractor. The inspection report shall, at a minimum, include a record of all dimensional data (coordinate/positional), material, finish, and process with appropriate pass/fail criteria, such ascertifications, and actual dimensional readings. FAILURE ANALYSIS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION:All failure analysis and corrective action reports/plans shall be submitted to the Government. NONCONFORMING MATERIAL:The contractor shall establish an effective system for controlling nonconforming material including procedures for identification, segregation, and disposition. CONTRACTOR INTERNAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB):IRB authority is delegated to the contractor for this contract only. The IRB may be used only for disposition of materials exhibiting minor non-conformances, scrap or rework to return a part to conformance with drawings or specifications as authorized by the approved repair procedures.IRB shall not use "AS-IS" disposition. A complete file of IRB actions shall be maintained for review by the Government for concurrance of classification. MATERIAL REVIEW BOARD (MRB):Formal MRB authority for disposition of "AS-IS"and for minor non-conformances is retained by the Government. The contractor shall submit the appropriate request for Variance via the DCMC to the NAVSUP Contracting Officer. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COMPLIANCE: All items must meet all requirements of this Statement of Work. The inspection requirements set forth in this SOW shall become part of the contractors overall inspection system or quality program. The absence of any inspection requirements in the SOW shall not relieve the contractor of the responsibility of assuring that all Government equipment submitted for acceptance comply with all requirements. Sampling in quality conformance does not authorize submission of known defective items, either indicated or actual, nor does it commit the procuring activity to acceptance of any defective items. REPAIR ASSESSMENT TESTING: The Government may select samples of the Contract Line Items (CLINS) which have completed repair and have been accepted by the Government representative for the purpose of conducting performance testing, environmental testing, and quality conformance examination in a repair assessment test program. A quantity of CLIN's may be randomly selected from each quaterly repair production completion for shipment to the CFA or other Government designated location to conduct this testing. RECORDS OF DATA COLLECTION: The contractor shall maintain a historical record file to contain copies of applicable data and documents for individual CLIN's and assemblies by CLIN serial number. The historical record file shall include,but not be limited to the following types of historical records: Receipt inspection documentation. Repair shop travelers or repair cards. Parts replacement records. Parts inspection data before and after repair as applicable. Acceptance test data. QA personnel shall maintain a complete receipt inspection,test, repair re-test, history card for each item processed. This information shall be made available to the Government upon request. 4. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS - NOT APPLICABLE. 5. PACKAGING- MIL-STD 2073 PACKAGING APPLIES AS FOUND ELSEWHERE IN THE SCHEDULE 6. NOTES - NOT APPLICABLE

05 / Historical Spending Trend

How has spending on the selected comparable contracts changed?

The same closed fiscal-year window and the same complete comparable-contract set are used throughout this Brief. Net obligations total $4.72M across 5 fiscal years.

Annual net obligations for the selected comparable contract set for this opportunity, classified under NAICS 335931 and PSC 5995.
Annual FPDS net obligations for the selected comparable contract set; direct and broad matches are identified separately in the table, and this is not total NAICS or PSC market spending.
Fiscal yearComparable obligationsActionsVendors
FY 2019$75.1K11
FY 2022$154.1K31
FY 2023$302.6K102
FY 2024$4.02M122
FY 2025$173.6K62

06 / Related Historical Awards

Which contracts support the comparison?

No direct contract reference was found. 15 broad matches are shown as supporting context.

Selected historical contracts comparable to this opportunity, ranked by absolute net obligations.
Comparable contracts selected using buyer, office, classification and requirement-language evidence; they are not asserted as predecessors.
ContractVendorLatest activityOfficeNAICS / PSCMatchObligationsActions
N0038323FAJ04NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONNov 5, 2025NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT335931 / 5995Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$40.5K4
N0038323FAJ05NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONSep 5, 2023NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT335931 / 5995Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$11.3K1
N0038326FCF0LBELL BOEING JOINT PROJECT OFFICEDec 23, 2025NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336411 / 5995Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$195.9K1
N0038323FRU0PNORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONOct 7, 2025NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336413 / 5995Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$36.0K8
N0038323FRU0RNORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONJun 26, 2024NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336413 / 5995Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$32.3K4
N0038323FRU0SNORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONJul 14, 2023NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336413 / 5995Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$8.5K1
N0038323FRU0JNORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONMay 24, 2023NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336413 / 5995Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$17.9K1
N0038323FRU0FNORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONMay 15, 2023NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336413 / 5995Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$17.4K1
N0038323FRU09NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONMar 27, 2023NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336413 / 5995Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$21.0K1
N0038322FRN1TBELL TEXTRON INC.Jun 8, 2022NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336411 / 5995Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$68.3K1
N0038322FRN18BELL TEXTRON INC.May 24, 2022NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336411 / 5995Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$85.8K2
N0038319PF086COBHAM ADVANCED ELECTRONIC SOLUTIONS INC.Jan 29, 2019NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT333999 / 5995Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$75.1K1
N0038323FRU0KNORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONNov 24, 2025NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336413 / 6150Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$02
N0038324FX93GSIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATIONSep 3, 2024NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336413 / 6150Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$4.02M1
N0038323FX953SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATIONJul 23, 2024NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT336413 / 6150Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$26.9K2

07 / Contractor Evidence

Which contractors have performed related work?

Historical contractors are ranked by direct procurement-family evidence and comparable contract activity. The table distinguishes connected holders from broader performers without identifying unverified bidders.

No directly connected predecessor was identified. The companies below are historical performers selected from the comparable contract set; none is identified as a bidder.

Suppliers ranked by net obligations within the selected comparable contract set for this opportunity.
Supplier concentration within the comparable contract set only; ranking does not establish incumbency or intent to bid.
CompanyEvidenceFitWhy includedContractsActionsObligationsLatest activityLinks
SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION
UEI UTJWTSLMFNG4 · CAGE 78286
Broad historical performer
Historical performer
ModerateComparable buyer and requirement history23$4.04MSep 3, 2024GETWAB profile
BELL BOEING JOINT PROJECT OFFICE
UEI JHFZTG8ZC9V2 · CAGE 3B1R2
Broad historical performer
Historical performer
ModerateComparable buyer and requirement history11$195.9KDec 23, 2025GETWAB profile
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION
UEI WNFAAJU8F1X1 · CAGE 0W6H8
Broad historical performer
Historical performer
ModerateComparable buyer and requirement history923$185.0KNov 24, 2025GETWAB profile
Verified via SAM Entities
Official website
BELL TEXTRON INC.
UEI N5QUZAYGPKM3 · CAGE 97499
Broad historical performer
Historical performer
ModerateComparable buyer and requirement history23$154.1KJun 8, 2022GETWAB profile
COBHAM ADVANCED ELECTRONIC SOLUTIONS INC.
UEI MMA7H4NEMCT9 · CAGE 93346
Broad historical performer
Historical performer
ModerateComparable buyer and requirement history11$75.1KJan 29, 2019GETWAB profile
Verified via SAM Entities
Official website

08 / Competitive Landscape

How was comparable work competed?

Competition treatment is calculated from exactly the same closed-period contract set used in Sections 5–7. It describes historical actions, not the outcome of this solicitation.

FPDS extent-of-competition categories recorded on the selected comparable contracts.
Competition treatment recorded only on the comparable contract set; it does not predict the outcome of this solicitation.
FPDS treatmentCodeActionsObligationsShare
Not competedC21$4.34M91.9%
Not competed under simplified acquisition proceduresG11$380.9K8.1%

09 / Procurement History

How was this opportunity published and updated?

2 SAM.gov notice records were resolved into this procurement family. The chronology shows how the requirement was published and updated.

NoticeTypePostedResponse deadlineStatusOfficial source
N0038326RNA53
59--WIRING HARNESS
PresolicitationSep 25, 2026Nov 9, 2026 12:00 AM GMT-0400ActiveView on SAM.gov
N0038326RNA53
Current Brief record
59--WIRING HARNESS
SolicitationOct 15, 2026Nov 16, 2026 2:00 PM GMT-0400ActiveView on SAM.gov

10 / NAICS and PSC Market Context

How large is the selected comparable market?

Classification codes organize the evidence; they do not prove that every contract in the broader NAICS or PSC market matches this requirement.

Comparable obligations$4.72M
Comparable contracts15
Historical suppliers5
CoverageFY 2019–FY 2025

11 / Capture Signals and Risks

What should be validated before committing capture resources?

Capture signals separate verified procurement-family evidence from unresolved requirements and market-only indicators.

Watch

Direct procurement-family evidence

No direct award record found

Strong

Buyer proximity

15 comparable record(s) share the contracting office

Watch

Eligibility

Not disclosed in the indexed notice

Watch

Unresolved requirement fields

6

12 / Who Should Pursue

When does this opportunity fit?

Pursue if
  • Your team can demonstrate recent, relevant delivery in 59--WIRING HARNESS.
  • Your company can document the stated eligibility conditions: The evidence states SBA reviewed the requirement and determined a set-aside recommendation was not applicable.
  • You can perform under the stated acquisition model: The evidence indicates the Government issues a contract/delivery order/purchase order/modification when properly transmitted, but it does not describe a specific vehicle type (e.g., IDIQ) or how future task orders are issued.
  • You can show credible past performance for NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT or a closely related federal customer.
Partner if
  • Your technical scope fits, but you lack demonstrated history with NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT.
  • You need a specialist teammate to close unresolved staffing, security, or detailed-scope requirements before committing.
Pass or investigate further if
  • You cannot satisfy or verify the stated eligibility conditions: The evidence states SBA reviewed the requirement and determined a set-aside recommendation was not applicable.
  • Your delivery model cannot support the stated contract vehicle or order-based work structure.
  • The unresolved requirements shown above cannot be validated before committing proposal resources.