GETWAB

01 / Federal Opportunity Brief

LEADERSHIP EXPERIENCE PROGRAM (LEP)

Status
Closing Soon
Deadline
Nov 20, 2026 3:00 PM GMT-0600
Solicitation
80NSSC27947456Q
Updated
Nov 6, 2026
NAICS
611430
PSC
U009

02 / Federal Buyer

Who is buying?

03 / Purchase

What is the government buying?

Requirement

LEADERSHIP EXPERIENCE PROGRAM (LEP)
The current notice is soliciting this requirement from eligible offerors.

Scope available now

The supplied evidence does not describe the technical scope or deliverables for the Leadership Experience Program (LEP).

Contract vehicle

The notice states that multiple Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPA) will be awarded as a result of the RFQ.

How work is assigned

Work-assignment/ordering rules are not described in the supplied evidence.

04 / Contracting Requirements

How will this procurement work?

RequirementWhat the notice saysSource status
EligibilityThe notice encourages qualifying companies to respond by the due date, but it does not define the qualifying criteria in the supplied evidence.Partially Confirmed
Contract ceilingNot disclosedNot Disclosed
Minimum guaranteeNot disclosedNot Disclosed
Contract durationNot disclosedNot Disclosed
Foreign participationNot disclosedNot Disclosed
Proposal and award procedureThe notice states that an amendment incorporates Q&A and extends the response date; it also describes a deadline to send questions. However, detailed submission instructions and detailed evaluation factors/scoring are not included in the supplied evidence.Partially Confirmed
Staffing and securityNo staffing requirements or security/clearance requirements are described in the supplied evidence.Not Disclosed
Read the original SAM.gov description

* AMENDMENT 1 - TO INCORPORATE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS AND EXTEND THE RESPONSE DATE TO 10/28/2026. * DEADLINE TO SEND QUESTIONS IS 10/23/2026 AT 1PM CT. MULITPLE BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENTS (BPA) WILL BE AWARDED AS A RESULT OF THIS RFQ. QUALIFYING COMPANIES ARE ENCOURAGED TO RESPOND BY THE DUE DATE OF 10/23/2026. THE SOLICITATION NUMBER MUST BE REFERENCED IN THE SUBJECT OF THE EMAIL TO BE CONSIDERED FOR AWARD. SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.

05 / Historical Spending Trend

How has spending on the selected comparable contracts changed?

The same closed fiscal-year window and the same complete comparable-contract set are used throughout this Brief. Net obligations total $623.2K across 3 fiscal years.

Annual net obligations for the selected comparable contract set for this opportunity, classified under NAICS 611430 and PSC U009.
Annual FPDS net obligations for the selected comparable contract set; direct and broad matches are identified separately in the table, and this is not total NAICS or PSC market spending.
Fiscal yearComparable obligationsActionsVendors
FY 2019$62.0K52
FY 2023$500.0K21
FY 2024$61.2K32

06 / Related Historical Awards

Which contracts support the comparison?

No direct contract reference was found. 4 broad matches are shown as supporting context.

Selected historical contracts comparable to this opportunity, ranked by absolute net obligations.
Comparable contracts selected using buyer, office, classification and requirement-language evidence; they are not asserted as predecessors.
ContractVendorLatest activityOfficeNAICS / PSCMatchObligationsActions
80NSSC24PC513BATTLEFIELD LEADERSHIP LLCSep 26, 2024NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTER611430 / U099Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$61.2K1
80NSSC19P0390ACADEMY LEADERSHIP LLCMar 7, 2019NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTER611430 / U001Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$62.0K2
80NSSC23K0611MUSEUM OF SCIENCESep 25, 2024NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTER / AJ14Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$01
NNX16AI83ASOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES & TECHNOLOGYMay 7, 2019NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTER / AR21Broad match
Buyer and requirement-language evidence
$02

07 / Contractor Evidence

Which contractors have performed related work?

Historical contractors are ranked by direct procurement-family evidence and comparable contract activity. The table distinguishes connected holders from broader performers without identifying unverified bidders.

No directly connected predecessor was identified. The companies below are historical performers selected from the comparable contract set; none is identified as a bidder.

Suppliers ranked by net obligations within the selected comparable contract set for this opportunity.
Supplier concentration within the comparable contract set only; ranking does not establish incumbency or intent to bid.
CompanyEvidenceFitWhy includedContractsActionsObligationsLatest activityLinks
ACADEMY LEADERSHIP LLC
UEI KN4KEAL9NKC3 · CAGE 3UGQ0
Broad historical performer
Historical performer
ModerateComparable buyer and requirement history12$62.0KMar 7, 2019GETWAB profile
Verified via SAM Entities
Official website
BATTLEFIELD LEADERSHIP LLC
UEI JRYCYJKAE9J8 · CAGE 819F9
Broad historical performer
Historical performer
ModerateComparable buyer and requirement history11$61.2KSep 26, 2024GETWAB profile
Verified via SAM Entities
Official website
MUSEUM OF SCIENCE
UEI KKW4W2TPS5N8 · CAGE 1WFC1
Broad historical performer
Historical performer
ModerateComparable buyer and requirement history11$0Sep 25, 2024GETWAB profile
Verified via SAM Entities
Official website
SOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES & TECHNOLOGY
UEI CJAJYT2KW771 · CAGE 1BMV3
Broad historical performer
Historical performer
ModerateComparable buyer and requirement history12$0May 7, 2019GETWAB profile
Verified via SAM Entities
Official website

08 / Competitive Landscape

How was comparable work competed?

Competition treatment is calculated from exactly the same closed-period contract set used in Sections 5–7. It describes historical actions, not the outcome of this solicitation.

FPDS extent-of-competition categories recorded on the selected comparable contracts.
Competition treatment recorded only on the comparable contract set; it does not predict the outcome of this solicitation.
FPDS treatmentCodeActionsObligationsShare
Not competedC4$500.0K80.2%
Not competed under simplified acquisition proceduresG3$123.2K19.8%
Full and open competitionA3$00.0%

09 / Procurement History

How was this opportunity published and updated?

3 SAM.gov notice records were resolved into this procurement family. The chronology shows how the requirement was published and updated.

NoticeTypePostedResponse deadlineStatusOfficial source
80NSSC27947456Q
LEADERSHIP EXPERIENCE PROGRAM (LEP)
SolicitationOct 15, 2026Oct 23, 2026 3:00 PM GMT-0400ActiveView on SAM.gov
80NSSC27947456Q
LEADERSHIP EXPERIENCE PROGRAM (LEP)
SolicitationOct 22, 2026Oct 28, 2026 3:00 PM GMT-0500ActiveView on SAM.gov
80NSSC27947456Q
Current Brief record
LEADERSHIP EXPERIENCE PROGRAM (LEP)
SolicitationNov 5, 2026Nov 20, 2026 3:00 PM GMT-0600ActiveView on SAM.gov

10 / NAICS and PSC Market Context

How large is the selected comparable market?

Classification codes organize the evidence; they do not prove that every contract in the broader NAICS or PSC market matches this requirement.

Comparable obligations$623.2K
Comparable contracts4
Historical suppliers4
CoverageFY 2019–FY 2024

11 / Capture Signals and Risks

What should be validated before committing capture resources?

Capture signals separate verified procurement-family evidence from unresolved requirements and market-only indicators.

Watch

Direct procurement-family evidence

No direct award record found

Strong

Buyer proximity

4 comparable record(s) share the contracting office

Watch

Eligibility

Not disclosed in the indexed notice

Watch

Unresolved requirement fields

7

12 / Who Should Pursue

When does this opportunity fit?

Pursue if
  • Your team can demonstrate recent, relevant delivery in LEADERSHIP EXPERIENCE PROGRAM (LEP).
  • Your company can document the stated eligibility conditions: The notice encourages qualifying companies to respond by the due date, but it does not define the qualifying criteria in the supplied evidence.
  • You can perform under the stated acquisition model: The notice states that multiple Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPA) will be awarded as a result of the RFQ.
  • You can show credible past performance for NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTER or a closely related federal customer.
Partner if
  • Your technical scope fits, but you lack demonstrated history with NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTER.
  • You need a specialist teammate to close unresolved staffing, security, or detailed-scope requirements before committing.
Pass or investigate further if
  • You cannot satisfy or verify the stated eligibility conditions: The notice encourages qualifying companies to respond by the due date, but it does not define the qualifying criteria in the supplied evidence.
  • Your delivery model cannot support the stated contract vehicle or order-based work structure.
  • Required solicitation attachments remain unavailable or materially change the understood scope, staffing, evaluation, or submission requirements.