GETWAB

01 / Contracting Office Profile

Judge Advocate General of the Navy Federal Contracts and Spending

Office code N00013

Judge Advocate General of the Navy is a federal contracting office within DEPT OF THE NAVY. This profile shows the office’s purchasing scale, incumbent vendors, market classifications, competition, and recent contract activity.

02 / Market Size

Judge Advocate General of the Navy contract market at a glance

Net obligations, purchasing activity, and supplier participation measured consistently across FY 2019–FY 2025.

Total obligations$537.9K
Contract actions30
Vendors16
Parent agencyDEPT OF THE NAVY
Parent departmentDEPT OF DEFENSE
Average action value$17.9K
Parent agency share0.0%
Data coverage FY 2019–2025

Across FY 2019–FY 2025, Judge Advocate General of the Navy accounts for 0.0% of its parent agency’s net contract obligations. Net obligations include positive obligations and later deobligations recorded during the same period.

03 / Spending Trend

Judge Advocate General of the Navy contract spending by year

Annual net obligations for FY 2019–FY 2025 show whether the office’s recorded contract market is growing or contracting. Actions and vendors indicate whether that change reflects broader purchasing activity or a smaller number of large transactions.

Total obligations$537.9K
FY 2019
ObligationsHistorical spending range
Fiscal yearObligationsActionsVendorsChange
FY 2019$537.9K3016

04 / Buying Hierarchy

Where does Judge Advocate General of the Navy sit in the federal buying structure?

The office executes procurement within a contracting agency, which belongs to a federal department. Follow either profile to compare this office with the broader organizations directing and funding its activity.

Organization levelOrganizationCodeExplore
Contracting agencyDEPT OF THE NAVY1700View agency profile
Federal departmentDEPT OF DEFENSE9700View department profile

05 / Top NAICS Industries

Which industries receive the most Judge Advocate General of the Navy contract spending?

NAICS industries ranked by recorded obligations show where this office’s contract demand is concentrated and how many actions and vendors participate in each market.

NAICSDescriptionObligationsActionsVendorsOffice share
334111ELECTRONIC COMPUTER MANUFACTURING$398.0K4174.0%
561492COURT REPORTING AND STENOTYPE SERVICES$57.3K15610.7%
541513COMPUTER FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SERVICES$48.2K219.0%
337214OFFICE FURNITURE (EXCEPT WOOD) MANUFACTURING$40.8K337.6%
337122NONUPHOLSTERED WOOD HOUSEHOLD FURNITURE MANUFACTURING$13.4K112.5%
337920BLIND AND SHADE MANUFACTURING$12.2K112.3%
511210SOFTWARE PUBLISHERS$9.6K211.8%
541611ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES$0110.0%
541519OTHER COMPUTER RELATED SERVICES-$41.7K11-7.7%

06 / Top Product and Service Codes

What products and services does Judge Advocate General of the Navy buy?

Product and Service Codes ranked by recorded obligations show the specific categories purchased by this office.

PSCDescriptionObligationsActionsVendorsOffice share
7010INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT SYSTEM CONFIGURATION$398.0K4174.0%
R603SUPPORT- ADMINISTRATIVE: TRANSCRIPTION$57.3K15610.7%
7110OFFICE FURNITURE$54.3K4410.1%
5805TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH EQUIPMENT$48.2K219.0%
7230DRAPERIES, AWNINGS, AND SHADES$12.2K112.3%
7030INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SOFTWARE$9.6K211.8%
R699SUPPORT- ADMINISTRATIVE: OTHER-$41.7K22-7.7%

07 / Top Vendors

Which contractors receive the most Judge Advocate General of the Navy obligations?

Vendors are ranked by recorded obligations to show the office’s leading incumbents, their share of spending, purchasing activity, and primary NAICS and PSC markets.

VendorObligationsAwards / actionsSharePrimary NAICS / PSC
MVATION WORLDWIDE INC.$398.0K474.0%NAICS 334111 · PSC 7010
AVAYA FEDERAL SOLUTIONS, INC.$48.2K29.0%NAICS 541513 · PSC 5805
TACTICAL OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC.$28.3K15.3%NAICS 337214 · PSC 7110
ECHO REPORTING, INC$23.0K54.3%NAICS 561492 · PSC R603
CORPORATE INTERIORS, INC.$13.4K12.5%NAICS 337122 · PSC 7110
COMBAT VETERAN VOICEWRITERS, LLC$13.1K22.4%NAICS 561492 · PSC R603
OFFICE LEADER CORP.$12.5K12.3%NAICS 337214 · PSC 7110
ACCENT DESIGNS LLC$12.2K12.3%NAICS 337920 · PSC 7230
MYERS & KINGTON REPORTING$11.6K32.2%NAICS 561492 · PSC R603
CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION$9.6K21.8%NAICS 511210 · PSC 7030

08 / Buying Pattern

How does Judge Advocate General of the Navy award contract work?

Competition, small-business participation, set-asides, transaction size, and action types provide a compact view of how the office structures its recorded contract activity.

Competition rate 100.0% Small-business share 11.8% Set-aside share 58.9% Average action value $17.9K Largest recorded action $204.4K
Contract action typeActionsShare of actions
Delivery Order2686.7%
BPA Call413.3%

09 / Recent Contract Awards

What did Judge Advocate General of the Navy award most recently in FY 2019–FY 2025?

The latest recorded contract actions inside this profile’s closed fiscal-year window connect award activity with the vendors, markets, agencies, and offices shown above.

10 / Interpreting the Profile

What does this contract market mean for a supplier?

This profile combines spending scale, the buying hierarchy, incumbent vendors, market classifications, and competition indicators. Read them together before deciding whether Judge Advocate General of the Navy represents an addressable market for your company.

01

Read spending in context

$537.9K in recorded obligations describes historical market scale. Compare it with 30 contract actions and an average action value of $17.9K to understand purchasing frequency and transaction size.

02

Follow the actual buyers

This office sits within DEPT OF THE NAVY and DEPT OF DEFENSE. Use that hierarchy to understand who directs its mission and how its purchasing compares with the broader organization.

03

Do not confuse scale with access

A large historical total does not mean the same amount is currently open for competition. Use the 100.0% competition rate, set-aside share, recent awards, and current opportunities to estimate what may actually be addressable.

04

Test market fit and incumbency

Compare leading vendors with NAICS 334111 and PSC 7010. Supplier concentration and competition reveal whether demand aligns with your capabilities and how difficult displacement may be.