01 / Vendor Profile
CYDAPTIV SOLUTIONS INC. Federal Contracts and Awards
UEI YUXRNXBQKKQ4 · CAGE 76AA8
Federal contract activity attributed to this vendor identity across FY 2019–FY 2025. Obligations are FPDS accounting transactions, not company revenue.
02 / Federal Business Size
Federal contract market at a glance
Measured consistently across FY 2019–FY 2025.
Across FY 2019–FY 2025, FPDS records attribute $23.12M in net contract obligations to CYDAPTIV SOLUTIONS INC. across 27 contract actions. Net obligations include positive obligations and later deobligations recorded during the same period.
03 / Spending Trend
CYDAPTIV SOLUTIONS INC. contract spending by year
Annual net obligations show whether recorded federal business expanded or contracted, while actions and customer counts show the breadth of that activity.
Total obligations$8.43M
FY 2025ObligationsHistorical spending range
| Fiscal year | Obligations | Actions | Federal customers | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2019 | $1.75M | 1 | 1 | — |
| FY 2020 | $2.97M | 2 | 1 | +69.1% |
| FY 2021 | $3.07M | 3 | 1 | +3.6% |
| FY 2023 | $1.79M | 3 | 2 | −41.6% |
| FY 2024 | $5.10M | 7 | 3 | +184.6% |
| FY 2025 | $8.43M | 11 | 3 | +65.2% |
04 / Federal Customers
Which federal agencies buy from CYDAPTIV SOLUTIONS INC.?
Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.
| Agency | Code | Obligations | Actions | Vendor share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2100 | $11.06M | 13 | 47.8% | |
| 1406 | $9.80M | 10 | 42.4% | |
| 1700 | $2.26M | 4 | 9.8% |
05 / Contracting Offices
Which contracting offices buy from CYDAPTIV SOLUTIONS INC.?
Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.
| Office | Code | Agency | Obligations | Actions | Vendor share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W912DY | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $10.68M | 9 | 46.2% | |
| 140D04 | DEPARTMENTAL OFFICES | $9.80M | 10 | 42.4% | |
| N00189 | DEPT OF THE NAVY | $2.26M | 3 | 9.8% | |
| W91QVN | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $380.0K | 4 | 1.6% | |
| N00178 | DEPT OF THE NAVY | $500 | 1 | 0.0% |
06 / Top NAICS Industries
Which industries define this vendor’s federal work?
07 / Top Product and Service Codes
What products and services does the government buy from this vendor?
| PSC | Description | Obligations | Actions | Customers | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DJ01 | IT AND TELECOM - SECURITY AND COMPLIANCE SUPPORT SERVICES (LABOR) | $9.80M | 10 | 1 | 42.4% |
| D310 | IT AND TELECOM- CYBER SECURITY AND DATA BACKUP | $7.79M | 6 | 1 | 33.7% |
| R499 | SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: OTHER | $2.88M | 4 | 2 | 12.5% |
| DA01 | IT AND TELECOM - BUSINESS APPLICATION/APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (LABOR) | $2.26M | 3 | 1 | 9.8% |
| DC01 | IT AND TELECOM - DATA CENTER SUPPORT SERVICES (LABOR) | $380.0K | 4 | 1 | 1.6% |
08 / Competition Pattern
How was CYDAPTIV SOLUTIONS INC.’s federal work competed?
Competition categories describe the procurement path recorded on the underlying contract actions.
09 / Recent Contract Awards
What contract actions were recorded most recently for CYDAPTIV SOLUTIONS INC.?
The latest recorded PIIDs connect this profile to the underlying federal award search.
| Award / PIID | Signed | Obligation | Agency / office | NAICS | PSC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 140D0424F0727 | Sep 8, 2025 | $2.15M | DEPARTMENTAL OFFICES IBC ACQ SVCS DIRECTORATE (00004) | 541519 | DJ01 |
10 / Interpreting the Profile
How should you evaluate CYDAPTIV SOLUTIONS INC. as a federal contractor?
Read obligations, customers, markets, competition, and individual awards together. A large historical total indicates federal scale, but it does not by itself describe current backlog, commercial revenue, profitability, or future opportunity.
Separate obligations from revenue
FPDS obligations are government accounting actions and may include later deobligations.
Follow customer concentration
Agency and office concentration reveals where the vendor’s federal relationships are strongest.
Test market overlap
NAICS and PSC shares show whether the vendor competes in the same markets as your company.
Inspect the awards
Open the PIIDs to verify dates, offices, classifications, and transaction history.