01 / Vendor Profile
MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT (MSA), INCORPORATED Federal Contracts and Awards
UEI HJWTVNBGPBV6 · CAGE 0M3S2
Federal contract activity attributed to this vendor identity across FY 2019–FY 2025. Obligations are FPDS accounting transactions, not company revenue.
02 / Federal Business Size
Federal contract market at a glance
Measured consistently across FY 2019–FY 2025.
Across FY 2019–FY 2025, FPDS records attribute $120.33M in net contract obligations to MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT (MSA), INCORPORATED across 285 contract actions. Net obligations include positive obligations and later deobligations recorded during the same period.
03 / Spending Trend
MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT (MSA), INCORPORATED contract spending by year
Annual net obligations show whether recorded federal business expanded or contracted, while actions and customer counts show the breadth of that activity.
Total obligations$24.01M
FY 2025ObligationsHistorical spending range
| Fiscal year | Obligations | Actions | Federal customers | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2019 | $14.32M | 45 | 3 | — |
| FY 2020 | $10.99M | 52 | 1 | −23.3% |
| FY 2021 | $13.14M | 39 | 1 | +19.6% |
| FY 2022 | $17.79M | 18 | 2 | +35.4% |
| FY 2023 | $19.29M | 28 | 2 | +8.4% |
| FY 2024 | $20.79M | 40 | 2 | +7.8% |
| FY 2025 | $24.01M | 63 | 1 | +15.5% |
04 / Federal Customers
Which federal agencies buy from MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT (MSA), INCORPORATED?
Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.
| Agency | Code | Obligations | Actions | Vendor share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2100 | $120.38M | 280 | 100.0% | |
| 1700 | $500 | 2 | 0.0% | |
| 9763 | $0 | 1 | 0.0% | |
| 7570 | $0 | 1 | 0.0% | |
| 7200 | -$48.7K | 1 | 0.0% |
05 / Contracting Offices
Which contracting offices buy from MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT (MSA), INCORPORATED?
Ranked by net obligations during FY 2019–FY 2025.
| Office | Code | Agency | Obligations | Actions | Vendor share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W91CRB | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $114.24M | 230 | 94.9% | |
| W911QX | DEPT OF THE ARMY | $6.14M | 50 | 5.1% | |
| N00178 | DEPT OF THE NAVY | $500 | 2 | 0.0% | |
| S3500A | DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DCMA) | $0 | 1 | 0.0% | |
| 75P001 | OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR ADMINISTRATION (ASA) | $0 | 1 | 0.0% | |
| 720MAS | AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT | -$48.7K | 1 | 0.0% |
06 / Top NAICS Industries
Which industries define this vendor’s federal work?
| NAICS | Description | Obligations | Actions | Customers | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 541330 | ENGINEERING SERVICES | $114.24M | 232 | 2 | 94.9% |
| 541990 | ALL OTHER PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC, AND TECHNICAL SERVICES | $5.43M | 45 | 2 | 4.5% |
| 541712 | RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT BIOTECHNOLOGY) | $669.0K | 7 | 2 | 0.6% |
| 561210 | FACILITIES SUPPORT SERVICES | $0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
07 / Top Product and Service Codes
What products and services does the government buy from this vendor?
| PSC | Description | Obligations | Actions | Customers | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H910 | OTHER QC/TEST/INSPECT- WEAPONS | $110.10M | 186 | 1 | 91.5% |
| AD25 | R&D- DEFENSE OTHER: SERVICES (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT) | $4.48M | 39 | 2 | 3.7% |
| R410 | SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: PROGRAM EVALUATION/REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT | $4.09M | 44 | 2 | 3.4% |
| AC12 | NATIONAL DEFENSE R&D SERVICES; DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE - MILITARY; APPLIED RESEARCH | $1.66M | 12 | 1 | 1.4% |
| R499 | SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: OTHER | $500 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
| R706 | SUPPORT- MANAGEMENT: LOGISTICS SUPPORT | $0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| R425 | SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL | -$24 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
08 / Competition Pattern
How was MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT (MSA), INCORPORATED’s federal work competed?
Competition categories describe the procurement path recorded on the underlying contract actions.
09 / Recent Contract Awards
What contract actions were recorded most recently for MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT (MSA), INCORPORATED?
The latest recorded PIIDs connect this profile to the underlying federal award search.
| Award / PIID | Signed | Obligation | Agency / office | NAICS | PSC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W911QX24C0022 | Sep 29, 2025 | $19.0K | DEPT OF THE ARMY W6QK ACC-APG ADELPHI | 541990 | AC12 |
10 / Interpreting the Profile
How should you evaluate MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT (MSA), INCORPORATED as a federal contractor?
Read obligations, customers, markets, competition, and individual awards together. A large historical total indicates federal scale, but it does not by itself describe current backlog, commercial revenue, profitability, or future opportunity.
Separate obligations from revenue
FPDS obligations are government accounting actions and may include later deobligations.
Follow customer concentration
Agency and office concentration reveals where the vendor’s federal relationships are strongest.
Test market overlap
NAICS and PSC shares show whether the vendor competes in the same markets as your company.
Inspect the awards
Open the PIIDs to verify dates, offices, classifications, and transaction history.