01 / Vendor Profile
SYSTEM PLANNING CORPORATION Federal Contracts and Awards
UEI FYA5SP1LGS36 · CAGE 9G490
Federal contract activity attributed to this vendor identity across FY 2020–FY 2026. Obligations are FPDS accounting transactions, not company revenue.
02 / Federal Business Size
Federal contract market at a glance
Measured consistently across FY 2020–FY 2026.
Across FY 2020–FY 2026, FPDS records attribute $3.51M in net contract obligations to SYSTEM PLANNING CORPORATION across 74 contract actions. Net obligations include positive obligations and later deobligations recorded during the same period.
03 / Spending Trend
SYSTEM PLANNING CORPORATION contract spending by year
Annual net obligations show whether recorded federal business expanded or contracted, while actions and customer counts show the breadth of that activity.
Total obligations-$130.8K
FY 2025ObligationsHistorical spending range
| Fiscal year | Obligations | Actions | Federal customers | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2020 | -$720.7K | 21 | 3 | — |
| FY 2021 | -$484.8K | 13 | 1 | +32.7% |
| FY 2022 | $4.90M | 36 | 1 | +1,111.7% |
| FY 2023 | -$55.3K | 3 | 3 | −101.1% |
| FY 2025 | -$130.8K | 1 | 1 | −136.6% |
04 / Federal Customers
Which federal agencies buy from SYSTEM PLANNING CORPORATION?
Ranked by net obligations during FY 2020–FY 2026.
| Agency | Code | Obligations | Actions | Vendor share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1406 | $3.77M | 57 | 107.4% | |
| 9763 | $0 | 5 | 0.0% | |
| 9761 | -$55.3K | 1 | -1.6% | |
| 97AE | -$204.8K | 11 | -5.8% |
05 / Contracting Offices
Which contracting offices buy from SYSTEM PLANNING CORPORATION?
Ranked by net obligations during FY 2020–FY 2026.
| Office | Code | Agency | Obligations | Actions | Vendor share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 140D04 | DEPARTMENTAL OFFICES | $3.77M | 57 | 107.4% | |
| S5102A | DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DCMA) | $0 | 5 | 0.0% | |
| HDTRA1 | DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY (DTRA) | -$55.3K | 1 | -1.6% | |
| HR0011 | DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY (DARPA) | -$204.8K | 11 | -5.8% |
06 / Top NAICS Industries
Which industries define this vendor’s federal work?
| NAICS | Description | Obligations | Actions | Customers | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 541330 | ENGINEERING SERVICES | $5.79M | 13 | 1 | 164.9% |
| 541710 | RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES | $0 | 5 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 541990 | ALL OTHER PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC, AND TECHNICAL SERVICES | $0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 541611 | ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES | -$204.8K | 11 | 1 | -5.8% |
| 541690 | OTHER SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES | -$2.07M | 42 | 2 | -59.0% |
07 / Top Product and Service Codes
What products and services does the government buy from this vendor?
| PSC | Description | Obligations | Actions | Customers | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ16 | R&D- OTHER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT) | $5.97M | 12 | 1 | 170.1% |
| AZ17 | R&D- OTHER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (COMMERCIALIZED) | $0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| R421 | TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE | $0 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
| AD92 | R&D- DEFENSE OTHER: OTHER (APPLIED RESEARCH/EXPLORATORY DEVELOPMENT) | $0 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
| AD93 | R&D- DEFENSE OTHER: OTHER (ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT) | $0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| AZ14 | R&D- OTHER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT) | -$95 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
| R499 | SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: OTHER | -$2.46M | 54 | 3 | -70.1% |
08 / Competition Pattern
How was SYSTEM PLANNING CORPORATION’s federal work competed?
Competition categories describe the procurement path recorded on the underlying contract actions.
09 / Recent Contract Awards
What contract actions were recorded most recently for SYSTEM PLANNING CORPORATION?
The latest recorded PIIDs connect this profile to the underlying federal award search.
| Award / PIID | Signed | Obligation | Agency / office | NAICS | PSC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0001 | Sep 24, 2025 | -$130.8K | DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY (DARPA) DEF ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGCY | 541611 | R499 |
10 / Interpreting the Profile
How should you evaluate SYSTEM PLANNING CORPORATION as a federal contractor?
Read obligations, customers, markets, competition, and individual awards together. A large historical total indicates federal scale, but it does not by itself describe current backlog, commercial revenue, profitability, or future opportunity.
Separate obligations from revenue
FPDS obligations are government accounting actions and may include later deobligations.
Follow customer concentration
Agency and office concentration reveals where the vendor’s federal relationships are strongest.
Test market overlap
NAICS and PSC shares show whether the vendor competes in the same markets as your company.
Inspect the awards
Open the PIIDs to verify dates, offices, classifications, and transaction history.