GETWAB

01 / Contracting Office Profile

Commanding Officer Federal Contracts and Spending

Office code M95494

Commanding Officer is a federal contracting office within DEPT OF THE NAVY. This profile shows the office’s purchasing scale, incumbent vendors, market classifications, competition, and recent contract activity.

02 / Market Size

Commanding Officer contract market at a glance

Net obligations, purchasing activity, and supplier participation measured consistently across FY 2019–FY 2025.

Total obligations$3.86B
Contract actions1,565
Vendors105
Parent agencyDEPT OF THE NAVY
Parent departmentDEPT OF DEFENSE
Average action value$2.47M
Parent agency share0.4%
Data coverage FY 2019–2025

Across FY 2019–FY 2025, Commanding Officer accounts for 0.4% of its parent agency’s net contract obligations. Net obligations include positive obligations and later deobligations recorded during the same period.

03 / Spending Trend

Commanding Officer contract spending by year

Annual net obligations for FY 2019–FY 2025 show whether the office’s recorded contract market is growing or contracting. Actions and vendors indicate whether that change reflects broader purchasing activity or a smaller number of large transactions.

Total obligations$603.54M
FY 2025
ObligationsHistorical spending range
Fiscal yearObligationsActionsVendorsChange
FY 2025$603.54M21655−9.7%
FY 2024$668.54M20054+9.9%
FY 2023$608.58M20755+4.2%
FY 2022$584.28M21657+9.4%
FY 2021$534.05M24165+3.5%
FY 2020$516.04M28667+49.6%
FY 2019$344.95M19952

04 / Buying Hierarchy

Where does Commanding Officer sit in the federal buying structure?

The office executes procurement within a contracting agency, which belongs to a federal department. Follow either profile to compare this office with the broader organizations directing and funding its activity.

Organization levelOrganizationCodeExplore
Contracting agencyDEPT OF THE NAVY1700View agency profile
Federal departmentDEPT OF DEFENSE9700View department profile

05 / Top NAICS Industries

Which industries receive the most Commanding Officer contract spending?

NAICS industries ranked by recorded obligations show where this office’s contract demand is concentrated and how many actions and vendors participate in each market.

NAICSDescriptionObligationsActionsVendorsOffice share
722310FOOD SERVICE CONTRACTORS$1.66B219143.0%
541810ADVERTISING AGENCIES$778.45M48120.2%
541219OTHER ACCOUNTING SERVICES$355.66M16139.2%
541330ENGINEERING SERVICES$353.26M260209.2%
541611ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES$255.00M428376.6%
541519OTHER COMPUTER RELATED SERVICES$114.87M8393.0%
541511CUSTOM COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES$69.00M4771.8%
531311RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY MANAGERS$59.50M1811.5%
541990ALL OTHER PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC, AND TECHNICAL SERVICES$45.44M4041.2%
611420COMPUTER TRAINING$27.07M710.7%

06 / Top Product and Service Codes

What products and services does Commanding Officer buy?

Product and Service Codes ranked by recorded obligations show the specific categories purchased by this office.

PSCDescriptionObligationsActionsVendorsOffice share
M1FDOPERATION OF DINING FACILITIES$1.66B205143.1%
R701SUPPORT- MANAGEMENT: ADVERTISING$778.45M48120.2%
R408SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT$429.55M4574011.1%
R799SUPPORT- MANAGEMENT: OTHER$357.22M18159.3%
DA01IT AND TELECOM - BUSINESS APPLICATION/APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (LABOR)$123.38M7663.2%
R706SUPPORT- MANAGEMENT: LOGISTICS SUPPORT$95.19M5172.5%
R704SUPPORT- MANAGEMENT: AUDITING$67.74M1011.8%
D399IT AND TELECOM- OTHER IT AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS$40.64M1831.1%
R499SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: OTHER$38.37M68111.0%
R429SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: EMERGENCY RESPONSE/DISASTER PLANNING/PREPAREDNESS SUPPORT$34.91M4230.9%

07 / Top Vendors

Which contractors receive the most Commanding Officer obligations?

Vendors are ranked by recorded obligations to show the office’s leading incumbents, their share of spending, purchasing activity, and primary NAICS and PSC markets.

VendorObligationsAwards / actionsSharePrimary NAICS / PSC
SODEXO MANAGEMENT INC.$1.66B21943.0%NAICS 722310 · PSC M1FD
J. WALTER THOMPSON U.S.A., LLC$778.45M4820.2%NAICS 541810 · PSC R701
KPMG LLP$343.24M1378.9%NAICS 541219 · PSC R704
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.$187.94M1144.9%NAICS 541330 · PSC R408
CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION$86.84M352.2%NAICS 541330 · PSC R706
METROSTAR SYSTEMS LLC$71.83M281.9%NAICS 541519 · PSC DA01
INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS CORPORATION$59.50M181.5%NAICS 531311 · PSC R799
DIGITAL CLOAK, LLC$38.57M311.0%NAICS 541990 · PSC R408
DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING SYSTEM SOLUTIONS PROVIDER INC.$30.23M120.8%NAICS 541511 · PSC D399
ANDURIL INDUSTRIES, INC.$29.86M80.8%NAICS 334511 · PSC 6350

08 / Buying Pattern

How does Commanding Officer award contract work?

Competition, small-business participation, set-asides, transaction size, and action types provide a compact view of how the office structures its recorded contract activity.

Competition rate 96.8% Small-business share 4.2% Set-aside share 69.9% Average action value $2.47M Largest recorded action $117.50M
Contract action typeActionsShare of actions
Delivery Order1,02265.3%
Definitive Contract50031.9%
Purchase Order432.7%

09 / Recent Contract Awards

What did Commanding Officer award most recently in FY 2019–FY 2025?

The latest recorded contract actions inside this profile’s closed fiscal-year window connect award activity with the vendors, markets, agencies, and offices shown above.

10 / Interpreting the Profile

What does this contract market mean for a supplier?

This profile combines spending scale, the buying hierarchy, incumbent vendors, market classifications, and competition indicators. Read them together before deciding whether Commanding Officer represents an addressable market for your company.

01

Read spending in context

$3.86B in recorded obligations describes historical market scale. Compare it with 1,565 contract actions and an average action value of $2.47M to understand purchasing frequency and transaction size.

02

Follow the actual buyers

This office sits within DEPT OF THE NAVY and DEPT OF DEFENSE. Use that hierarchy to understand who directs its mission and how its purchasing compares with the broader organization.

03

Do not confuse scale with access

A large historical total does not mean the same amount is currently open for competition. Use the 96.8% competition rate, set-aside share, recent awards, and current opportunities to estimate what may actually be addressable.

04

Test market fit and incumbency

Compare leading vendors with NAICS 722310 and PSC M1FD. Supplier concentration and competition reveal whether demand aligns with your capabilities and how difficult displacement may be.