01 / Contracting Agency Profile
Agricultural Marketing Service Federal Contracts and Spending
Agency code 12K2
Agricultural Marketing Service is a federal contracting agency within AGRICULTURE, DEPARTMENT OF. This profile shows its purchasing scale, buying offices, incumbent vendors, market classifications, competition, and recent contract activity.
02 / Market Size
Agricultural Marketing Service contract market at a glance
Net obligations, purchasing activity, and supplier participation measured consistently across FY 2019–FY 2025.
Across FY 2019–FY 2025, Agricultural Marketing Service accounts for 49.1% of its parent department’s net contract obligations. It records activity through 12 contracting offices. Net obligations include positive obligations and later deobligations recorded during the same period.
03 / Spending Trend
Agricultural Marketing Service contract spending by year
Annual net obligations for FY 2019–FY 2025 show whether the agency’s recorded contract market is growing or contracting. Actions and vendors indicate whether that change reflects broader purchasing activity or a smaller number of large transactions.
Total obligations$3.67B
FY 2025ObligationsHistorical spending range
| Fiscal year | Obligations | Actions | Vendors | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2025 | $3.67B | 9,618 | 463 | −22.2% |
| FY 2024 | $4.72B | 9,577 | 464 | −4.1% |
| FY 2023 | $4.92B | 7,009 | 454 | +10.3% |
| FY 2022 | $4.46B | 6,359 | 482 | −21.4% |
| FY 2021 | $5.67B | 4,377 | 468 | −30.4% |
| FY 2020 | $8.15B | 5,931 | 660 | +120.7% |
| FY 2019 | $3.69B | 3,417 | 403 | — |
04 / Contracting Offices
Which contracting offices buy through Agricultural Marketing Service?
Contracting Offices are ranked by recorded contract obligations. Compare their share of agency spending, purchasing activity, supplier participation, and leading NAICS and PSC markets, then open a profile to continue the analysis.
| Contracting office | Code | Obligations | Agency share | Actions | Vendors | Top NAICS | Top PSC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 123J14 | $30.16B | 85.5% | 34,497 | 751 | 311999 | 8915 | |
| 121NTB | $2.75B | 7.8% | 606 | 22 | 311212 | 8920 | |
| 121NTP | $2.25B | 6.4% | 4,520 | 59 | 311225 | 8945 | |
| 124740 | $86.56M | 0.2% | 1,121 | 127 | 236220 | Y1HZ | |
| 121NTF | $16.80M | 0.0% | 5,053 | 11 | 483111 | V115 | |
| 121NTS | $6.45M | 0.0% | 364 | 7 | 488390 | H987 | |
| 123269 | $1.17M | 0.0% | 85 | 55 | 453210 | 6640 | |
| 1233MM | $0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 311991 | 8915 | |
| 12439Q | -$1.9K | 0.0% | 5 | 4 | 311991 | 8915 | |
| 1245VH | -$2.0K | 0.0% | 7 | 5 | 311911 | 8925 |
05 / Top NAICS Industries
Which industries receive the most Agricultural Marketing Service contract spending?
NAICS industries ranked by recorded obligations show where this agency’s contract demand is concentrated and how many actions and vendors participate in each market.
| NAICS | Description | Obligations | Actions | Vendors | Agency share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 311999 | ALL OTHER MISCELLANEOUS FOOD MANUFACTURING | $7.37B | 4,539 | 179 | 20.9% |
| 311611 | ANIMAL (EXCEPT POULTRY) SLAUGHTERING | $4.51B | 3,705 | 61 | 12.8% |
| 311421 | FRUIT AND VEGETABLE CANNING | $3.57B | 6,949 | 67 | 10.1% |
| 311615 | POULTRY PROCESSING | $3.42B | 2,787 | 41 | 9.7% |
| 311991 | PERISHABLE PREPARED FOOD MANUFACTURING | $3.00B | 2,972 | 261 | 8.5% |
| 311513 | CHEESE MANUFACTURING | $2.77B | 3,494 | 38 | 7.9% |
| 311710 | SEAFOOD PRODUCT PREPARATION AND PACKAGING | $1.62B | 745 | 35 | 4.6% |
| 311411 | FROZEN FRUIT, JUICE, AND VEGETABLE MANUFACTURING | $1.52B | 2,743 | 55 | 4.3% |
| 311911 | ROASTED NUTS AND PEANUT BUTTER MANUFACTURING | $1.24B | 1,068 | 43 | 3.5% |
| 311423 | DRIED AND DEHYDRATED FOOD MANUFACTURING | $1.05B | 1,059 | 35 | 3.0% |
06 / Top Product and Service Codes
What products and services does Agricultural Marketing Service buy?
Product and Service Codes ranked by recorded obligations show the specific categories purchased by this agency.
| PSC | Description | Obligations | Actions | Vendors | Agency share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8915 | FRUITS AND VEGETABLES | $14.25B | 16,147 | 460 | 40.4% |
| 8905 | MEAT, POULTRY, AND FISH | $10.76B | 8,195 | 171 | 30.5% |
| 8945 | FOOD, OILS AND FATS | $3.99B | 3,581 | 51 | 11.3% |
| 8910 | DAIRY FOODS AND EGGS | $3.71B | 6,887 | 106 | 10.5% |
| 8920 | BAKERY AND CEREAL PRODUCTS | $1.96B | 3,925 | 77 | 5.6% |
| 8925 | SUGAR, CONFECTIONERY, AND NUTS | $269.18M | 422 | 19 | 0.8% |
| V112 | TRANSPORTATION/TRAVEL/RELOCATION- TRANSPORTATION: MOTOR FREIGHT | $172.75M | 654 | 31 | 0.5% |
| 8105 | BAGS AND SACKS | $44.27M | 295 | 10 | 0.1% |
| 6640 | LABORATORY EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES | $26.50M | 75 | 7 | 0.1% |
| V115 | TRANSPORTATION/TRAVEL/RELOCATION- TRANSPORTATION: VESSEL FREIGHT | $16.76M | 5,047 | 10 | 0.0% |
07 / Top Vendors
Which contractors receive the most Agricultural Marketing Service obligations?
Vendors are ranked by recorded obligations to show the agency’s leading incumbents, their share of spending, purchasing activity, and primary NAICS and PSC markets.
| Vendor | Obligations | Awards / actions | Share | Primary NAICS / PSC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TYSON FOODS, INC. | $1.35B | 693 | 3.8% | NAICS 311615 · PSC 8905 |
| STUTZ PACKING COMPANY | $805.93M | 518 | 2.3% | NAICS 311911 · PSC 8915 |
| CARGILL, INCORPORATED | $710.39M | 129 | 2.0% | NAICS 311999 · PSC 8945 |
| ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY | $664.27M | 243 | 1.9% | NAICS 311224 · PSC 8945 |
| GOODMAN FOOD PRODUCTS | $640.13M | 221 | 1.8% | NAICS 311999 · PSC 8905 |
| BONGARDS' CREAMERIES | $620.76M | 531 | 1.8% | NAICS 311513 · PSC 8910 |
| PACIFIC COAST PRODUCERS | $579.05M | 479 | 1.6% | NAICS 311421 · PSC 8915 |
| LAKESIDE FOODS INC | $560.91M | 617 | 1.6% | NAICS 311611 · PSC 8905 |
| JENNIE-O TURKEY STORE, INC. | $457.11M | 227 | 1.3% | NAICS 311615 · PSC 8905 |
| CAVINESS BEEF PACKERS, LTD. | $456.91M | 307 | 1.3% | NAICS 311611 · PSC 8905 |
08 / Buying Pattern
How does Agricultural Marketing Service award contract work?
Competition, small-business participation, set-asides, transaction size, and action types provide a compact view of how the agency structures its recorded contract activity.
Competition rate 99.4%
Small-business share 3.6%
Set-aside share 83.2%
Average action value $762.0K
Largest recorded action $107.04M
09 / Recent Contract Awards
What did Agricultural Marketing Service award most recently in FY 2019–FY 2025?
The latest recorded contract actions inside this profile’s closed fiscal-year window connect award activity with the vendors, markets, agencies, and offices shown above.
| Award / PIID | Vendor | Signed date | Obligation | NAICS | PSC | Contracting agency / office |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 123J1425F1427 | BURNETTE FOODS, INC. | Sep 30, 2025 | $0 | 311421 | 8915 | AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE USDA AMS 3J14 |
| 123J1425F1421 | LAKESIDE FOODS INC | Sep 30, 2025 | $0 | 311421 | 8915 | AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE USDA AMS 3J14 |
| 123J1425C1375 | MAINE FARMERS EXCHANGE | Sep 30, 2025 | $0 | 311411 | 8915 | AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE USDA AMS 3J14 |
| 123J1425C1377 | HORIZON MARKETING, INC. | Sep 30, 2025 | $0 | 311411 | 8915 | AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE USDA AMS 3J14 |
| 123J1425F1420 | LAKESIDE FOODS INC | Sep 30, 2025 | $0 | 311421 | 8915 | AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE USDA AMS 3J14 |
| 12474022C0017 | MBG INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS L. L. C. | Sep 30, 2025 | -$104.2K | 561990 | R799 | AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE USDA AMS COTTON DIVISION |
10 / Interpreting the Profile
What does this contract market mean for a supplier?
This profile combines spending scale, the buying hierarchy, incumbent vendors, market classifications, and competition indicators. Read them together before deciding whether Agricultural Marketing Service represents an addressable market for your company.
Read spending in context
$35.27B in recorded obligations describes historical market scale. Compare it with 46,288 contract actions and an average action value of $762.0K to understand purchasing frequency and transaction size.
Follow the actual buyers
The agency total is distributed across 12 contracting offices. Move into those organizations to identify who manages the programs and awards relevant to your offer.
Do not confuse scale with access
A large historical total does not mean the same amount is currently open for competition. Use the 99.4% competition rate, set-aside share, recent awards, and current opportunities to estimate what may actually be addressable.
Test market fit and incumbency
Compare leading vendors with NAICS 311999 and PSC 8915. Supplier concentration and competition reveal whether demand aligns with your capabilities and how difficult displacement may be.